He has career averages of 17/10, and was a critical piece on a Finals team. Yet you can’t help but feel like he’s been a huge disappointment relative to his draft position.

In a vacuum, meaning ignoring who he was drafted over, is Ayton a bust for a #1 pick?

  • batmans420@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    He’s not a bust. He just hasn’t lived up to expectations. There’s a difference

  • HotspurJr@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    People use the word bust way too liberally. I’m not a big fan but this is absurd.

    Ayton is somewhere close to average for the #1 pick in the 21st century. Maybe a little bit below it, but not a lot.

  • angel2timez@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I can see him easily having a 12+ career which is far from bust. You guys are comparing him to luka. 17/10 is great career numbers lol

  • referee-superfan@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Near all star isn’t really a bust. He’s overpaid and not necessarily what people want out of a number 1 pick. But he could realistically contribute on a contender and has been a good part of a finals appearance.

  • cock-a-dooodle-do@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    James Wiseman defines the bust standard. Now ask yourself if Ayton meets that standard? But he also calls himself DOMINAYTON, and he is definitely bust by his own standard.

  • legend023@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    For the #1 pick

    Has he gotten better since his 2nd season? That answers your question right there, and usually a first overall pick should be on his first team more than 5 years (unless he forces himself out)