Got the inspiration from someone in a thread saying they would be great at losing games for a team, which made me wonder, why tanking teams don’t play undrafted scrubs instead of NBA level players.

  • Hypnosix@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    In addition to what everyone else said. You develop players while tanking and then every player that comes through during the tank and outperforms their contract is either a valuable trade piece that will bring back more picks or a player that could contribute to the teams depth in the future.

  • whoissteveo@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Players association would never stand for an entire team signing nothing but undrafted players, just from a contract standpoint.

  • PonkMcSquiggles@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    When the Process Sixers were openly tanking, the other owners pressured the league into doing something about it because it was hurting their bottom line. This would be even more blatant than what Sam Hinkie was doing

  • BluejayBlend@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    bad for developing any good or decent players you do have

    pisses off the players you drafted who wanna be playing

    won’t make as much money because fans won’t wanna watch undrafted players lose every night

    will probably get investigated by the league for blatantly tanking for not playing your starters anyway

  • k1ngkoala@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Everyone basically already explained why. Another reason is because no one would pay to attend games if the team was filled with random bums. I’d imagine the decrease in revenue would hurt badly, as will the fines, negative press, player reactions, etc.

  • samueladams6@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Because it’s both an awful way to build a team that you would presumably want to win in the relative near future, and it’s bad for the league as a whole and someone is going to eventually step in and put an end to it.

  • juttangokooll@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Lol, have you seen some of the guys on tanking teams? They might as well be literal non basketball players. But for real though, everyone in the NBA can ball and these undrafted scrubs wouldn’t stand a chance against actual players.

  • Strategist40@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    The product would be too shit I imagine. Bad, but still somewhat good enough teams that compete still sell some tickets and other things.

  • Potential-Pipe-4957@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Too obvious. The league doesn’t actually care if you flagrantly lose games as long as it’s not too obvious to the casual fan. In recent memory the league had no issue with the Lakers tanking to keep their pick, the spurs resting starters for wemby, OKC doing similar for draft capital. That’s all ok as long as it’s plausibly deniable. The 76ers acknowledging it was the NBAs real issue with their tank job

    Grabbing guys from Walmart would be a step too far. It’s okay to be bad, even be bad on purpose, as long as you’re not selling that as the product