• Mongostein@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I would hope so.

    Here’s a semi-related tip I learned that I use religiously:

    Journalists are not supposed to be leading you to an opinion, so I look at if they’re using qualitative words instead of quantitative

    Ex; “The car drove fast.” is leading you to an opinion. They should tell you a speed in number format so you can decide if that’s too fast for yourself.

    • patatas@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Well, hopefully you can continue to provide this type of analysis when others in this community cast doubt on high-quality reporting merely because of the nationality of an outlet’s ownership.

      • LostWon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        While I recall seeing some columnists who seem to have a specific agenda to back certain industries, I think what most people are concerned about is not that breaking reports are done by cartoonishly evil journalists, but that foreign interests have undue influence over editorial decisions. (As I see it, billionaires from our own country are equally as bad and media concentration in general should also be addressed, but it makes sense to have reasonable restrictions on foreign-ownership of media.)

        • patatas@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I absolutely agree with everything you just said.

          And yet when our PM threatens to slash the CBC’s budget by $198m, the same folks hammering those points fail to point out the exact same issue of undue pressure and influence. Why?