qaz@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 个月前Who cares about time complexitylemmy.worldimagemessage-square69linkfedilinkarrow-up1454arrow-down12
arrow-up1452arrow-down1imageWho cares about time complexitylemmy.worldqaz@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 个月前message-square69linkfedilink
minus-squaretrxxruraxvr@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up34arrow-down1·edit-22 个月前IIV would never be used. In Roman numerals at most one smaller unit can come in front of a larger one. The code doesn’t do any validation though.
minus-squareMirodir@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up14·2 个月前While it doesn’t say anything about IIV specifically, they sure got creative enough to sometimes subtract more than one of the smaller units from a larger one.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down8·2 个月前Yes, that does demonstrate my point.
IIV becomes IIIII, hm?
IIV would never be used. In Roman numerals at most one smaller unit can come in front of a larger one. The code doesn’t do any validation though.
While it doesn’t say anything about IIV specifically, they sure got creative enough to sometimes subtract more than one of the smaller units from a larger one.
Yes, that does demonstrate my point.