The ability to change features, prices, and availability of things you’ve already paid for is a powerful temptation to corporations.

  • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    173
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    One of the great modern scams, was to convince society that unauthorized copying of data is somehow equivalent to taking away a physical object.

    • Coasting0942@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      67
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Jesus didn’t ask for permission to copy bread and fish. It’s a clear moral precedent that if you can copy you should.

      What would the Jesus do?

      Checkmate Atheists!

          • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            You seem to not understand what the word own means and the difference between material and not material goods.

              • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                11 months ago

                I have a thing and than someone takes it away, so I can’t use it anymore. If somebody copies that thing - it’s not really theft.

                My point is more - concepts from physical world don’t nessessary apply to digital world.

                • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  It just seems that what you are saying is that people shouldn’t be paid if their work doesn’t create something physical.

                  • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Nope, that’s not what I’m saying. I just make a difference between copying, stealing, physical goods, digital goods and immaterial things. They are not the same.

                    Easy examples: original and copy does not really apply to digital works or two people on opposite sides of world can have the same thought but not have the same physical object at the same time, etc.

                  • TootGuitar@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    You say “ask the dictionary” — multiple dictionary definitions as well as Wikipedia say that theft requires the intent to deprive the original owner of the property in question, which obviously doesn’t apply to copyright infringement of digital works.

                    You say “ask the law” — copyright infringement is not stealing, they are literally two completely different statutes, at least in the US.

                    So, what the hell are you talking about? Copyright infringement is not theft.

          • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            I love how you guys play these mental gymnastics to justify this shit to yourselves.

            I love how you bootlickers always deny that anyone could possibly have a principled objection to modern intellectual property laws. I don’t need to “justify” at all. I rarely even pirate anything, but I don’t believe I’m doing anything wrong when I do.

          • aylex@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            “Something you never would have dedicated as much time to if you couldn’t be compensated for it.”

            Just telling on yourself 😂

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Nah, if I stole their IP, they wouldn’t have it anymore

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        If no one thinks that, why are you saying it right now?

        Actual theft of intellectual property would involve somehow tricking the world into thinking you hold the copyright to something that someone else owns.

    • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      60
      ·
      11 months ago

      So you also believe people shouldn’t need a ticket for a concert, for example?

      • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I don’t see anything wrong with paying for software or music or digital media. I don’t think that not doing so is theft - like I also don’t think that getting into a concert without paying is theft. By the way a concert is also not digital data, at least an irl one.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          A library card is your ticket there and libraries are paid via taxes, which is why they’re free at point of use.

          Attending a free concert is not stealing. Breaking into the Eras tour is.

          • snooggums@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            The library buys once and allows multiple people to read/watch each item without each person needing to individually purchase. Just like one person buying something and sharing it with others.

            The main point is that digitization distribution is not a concert

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              11 months ago

              Digital distribution is a service. You can steal a service.

              If you fuck a prostitute and then don’t pay them, you are stealing from them.

              • snooggums@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                If the prostitute uses a technique, and then you use the same technique without paying hem for reuse, is that stealing or does their direct involvement matter?

                • sdoorex@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  If you’re going to retype the code of a program from scratch, then your analogy is valid. If instead you are taking the production created through someone else’s labor without compensating them, then you are stealing from them.

                • SCB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  Prostitutes don’t become prostitutes because they know secret techniques.

                  The metaphor is describing the service provided, and that not paying for said service is indeed stealing.

                  Trying to make it a different metaphor requires a new framework from you, because you copying their actual service would be you pimping them, under this metaphor.

                  • snooggums@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Someone sharing content on a peer to peer distribution network is not using the digital distribution service of whoever sold the content. They are not ‘stealing’ HBOs bandwidth to share Game of Thrones.

                    They are sharing a thing that they initially paid for from HBO at no cost to others, similar to letting your friends watch it with you on your TV at the same time. The only difference is scale.

              • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                You’re not using their distribution service when you pirate something. That’s the whole point.

              • psud@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                It’s okay I won’t use their digital distribution system to pirate their stuff.

                It’s just like falling to pay a prostitute you never fucked

        • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Libraries get money via tax. What people here are arguing for is that others should work for them or free. Because game studios, for example, are overwhelmingly not paid via tax money. They are depending on people buying their software. And many software has ongoing costs.

      • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Do you think I should be forced to pay for a ticket if I’m standing next to the concert venue on the sidewalk but can still hear the performance?

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I have never had a problem with people taking a tape recorder to a concert, even if it’s against terms of service

      • Cypher@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        The performers time is not infinitely reproducible so your argument is apples to oranges.