#Km91#@sh.itjust.works to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 2 days agoWe are good up to Leopards. Sorry about the Tiger.sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square29linkfedilinkarrow-up1417arrow-down12
arrow-up1415arrow-down1imageWe are good up to Leopards. Sorry about the Tiger.sh.itjust.works#Km91#@sh.itjust.works to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 2 days agomessage-square29linkfedilink
minus-squarefibojoly@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 day agoMonthly pet rent?! Is this a pet sitter?
minus-squarePyr@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·13 hours agoI don’t think ita unreasonable to do so, but it should not be in addition to the deposit. Should be one or the other. Like, over time it’s more likely for damage from pets to build up and can easily get over $250 after a year or two. But good luck getting over $250 damage in 2-3 months. So I would see it reasonable to charge per month per pet, in the assumption that there will be damages to fix building up over time.
minus-squarePup Biru@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-29 hours agodeposit is the only acceptable thing here… rent? no way! you don’t pay rent per person in the house. the landlord is losing nothing per month for your pet the potential damages come from the additional deposit/bond
minus-squareFatVegan@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 day agoI would assume it’s rent and that’s why there is a 2 pet limit. Kind of insane.
minus-squarejumping redditor [they/them]@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·1 day agothey would charge per occupant if it wasn’t for those regressive pro child birthing laws
Monthly pet rent?! Is this a pet sitter?
I don’t think ita unreasonable to do so, but it should not be in addition to the deposit. Should be one or the other.
Like, over time it’s more likely for damage from pets to build up and can easily get over $250 after a year or two.
But good luck getting over $250 damage in 2-3 months.
So I would see it reasonable to charge per month per pet, in the assumption that there will be damages to fix building up over time.
deposit is the only acceptable thing here… rent? no way! you don’t pay rent per person in the house. the landlord is losing nothing per month for your pet
the potential damages come from the additional deposit/bond
I would assume it’s rent and that’s why there is a 2 pet limit. Kind of insane.
they would charge per occupant if it wasn’t for those regressive pro child birthing laws