Why is the journalistic standard to embed tweets (xeets?) instead of using screenshots?

An embedded tweet can be deleted, and depends on X supporting the functionality. If editing is ever introduced on the platform, it would permanently break all past articles that don’t have an independent record of the tweet (such as a full quote in the article or a screenshot). X can potentially (and maybe does) embed tracking features.

It seems like there are a lot of good reasons not to use embedded tweets, but almost every news source does it this way. Is there a good reason why?

  • Jeena@jemmy.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    11 months ago

    They don’t care about you but yes they would probably go after a newspaper and sue them for copyright infringement.

    • Steve
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      That suit would be practically impossible, as it’s clearly Fair Use.

      • centof@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Fair use is a defense you have to make in court. And court is expensive.

      • CluckN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I hate Twitter but I despise articles that just post 3 tweets and provides a barebones AI recap of the conversation.