Other right-wing accounts variously reacted by describing the move as Orwellian, lamenting the death of free speech and even contemplating leaving Canada for good.

Oh no. Not that. Please no.

<Tee hee!>

  • blargerer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    11 months ago

    Gotta love Canadians that think they are ruled by American laws. Every Canadian should know slander and libel laws here are much more restrictive on speech.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        This seems to be the whole point of the Conservative Party these days. Wannabe US Republicans.

        • pbjamm@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          They may be shitty but they have a long way to go to be GQP shitty.

          • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Agreed. It’s creeping in but they’re still just the party of rich people who want less taxes in large part.

    • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      Defamation isn’t protected under US laws either. It might not be super well enforced, especially on the internet, but that’s also not really exclusive to the US. A lot of countries are just now really getting into the legalities of what happens on the internet, for better or worse in certain cases. But generally speaking, laws also apply to what you say online of course.

      • blargerer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        There is a fundamental difference in the way defamation is treated in Canada(and other Common law countries like the UK and Australia) and the US. This is a simplification, but basically in the US you generally need to prove that the statement was knowingly false (in addition to other defamation requirements like proving damages). This is nearly impossible to do in most situations. In Common law the person who said the statement needs to prove they had a reasonable justification for thinking the statement true. This reverses who the onus of proof is on and makes winning defamation cases in Canada actually plausible.