• Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    53 minutes ago

    i’d support a live-action remake if it’s with actual real foxes and it’s obviously filmed on a set with voices dubbed over and they leave in 10% of the bloopers.

  • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    “Fans of Disney‘s 1970s animated feature Robin Hood aren’t likely to be feeling particularly merry after the latest update about a potential live-action remake.”

    Bull fucking shit we are. Dodged a dumpster fire.

  • OwOarchist@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I have mixed feelings about this.

    On one hand a “live action” (ie, CGI) remake of this would be awful.

    But on the other hand, it would be millions of dollars worth of fresh new furry bait that I could easily pirate.

  • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 hours ago

    With ideas for films like this, it’s no wonder all the legacy film studios are struggling to fill seats in theaters.

  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Good.

    When this obscene trend of CGI remakes caught up to movies originally in CGI - what would they call it? Were we on track for a Polar Express version of Frozen?

    Hey Disney, if you want actual on-camera fox people, I can name some websites. They’re big fans of this movie.

  • showmeyourkizinti@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Come on Disney forget the CGI ‘live action’ remakes give me what I need a Muppets remake. Fozzie as Frier Tuck, Rizzo as the Sheriff of Nottingham, Miss Piggy as Maid Marion, and Kermit wearing fox ears as Robin.

  • Smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    9 hours ago

    “Hey let’s do a live action and CGI version of a beloved 1970s classic.” Keep scraping that barrel, Hollywood, you must be close to getting through the bottom so you can start scraping up mud.

  • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Is there a detoxified version of the link?

    Anyway, I’m curious if was meant to be a rework of the animated film, or an entirely new premise…?

    • dumbass@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Remake of the animated one for sure, They’ve been redoing their animated hits in hopes people watch those instead so they can stop paying the animaters royalties. Cgi animators dont get the same deal the old 2d animators had

      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I’m gonna take a weird angle on this and say nobody should still be paid for this movie, because it belongs in the public domain.

        Thirty years. No exceptions.

        • OwOarchist@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Thirty years. No exceptions.

          Honestly, 10 years is plenty.

          And that’s coming from a content creator.

      • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Thanks, mate. I haven’t really followed them for a long time, altho of course they’re everywhere, these days.

        Btw, I went in to a major trance-state just now, watching your avatar icon. oO