• Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    134
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Not as bad as the AI-generated articles showing up in search results. Some websites I get driven to make absolutely no sense, despite a lot of words being written about all kinds of topics.

    I’m looking forward to the day when “certified human content” is a thing, and that’s all search engines allow you to see.

    • xePBMg9@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The winning search engine will link to useful and relevant content, whether they are ai generated or not.

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s more likely that the winning search engine will be the one that generates the most ad revenue via clicks.

      • GigglyBobble@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Eventually all content will just be AI generated on the fly. No need to keep dumb content on precious storage that could be used to increase model size.

        • mPony@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 months ago

          Eventually all comments will be AI-generated too, carefully crafted to ensure humans follow a paid narrative.

    • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      They’ll just make certification so expensive only the wealthy will qualify.

      You’ll never hear another perspective again.

      • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Or, you know, we go back to the time when the news media had real gatekeepers and not just any random jackass could churn out some bullshit copy and broadcast it to the world, let alone have it get published by their local paper.

        It’s nice that the Internet has democratized access to a national or even global audience, but let’s not pretend for a moment that it hasn’t caused a ton of problems in the process such that now many people have no idea of what to believe while others believe whatever they want.

    • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s still pretty easy to tell the difference. You have to have a pretty low level of media literacy to not be able to easily spot it. Unfortunately we already know that most people don’t have a clue when it comes to mass media, and even if they did, we also know that people tend to believe whatever reinforces their priors.

      • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        For now, just like it was easy to identify AI art by the fucked up hands for a few months before that was mostly ironed out. AI really doesn’t need to get that much “smarter” to start fooling people in their native tongue, it just needs to be able to string the right words together more often. And there’s a few billion guinea pigs out there to test on.