This is not a criticism - I love how much attention this game has been getting. I’m just not understanding why BG3 has been blowing up so much. It seems like BG3 is getting more attention than all of Larian’s previous games combined (and maybe all of Obsidian’s recent crpgs as well). Traditionally crpgs have not lit the world on fire in this way. Is it just timing of the release? Is it a combo of Divinity fans and new D&D fans and Baldur’s Gate oldheads all being stoked about this release for their own reasons? Or something else?

Note:I have not played it yet myself, just curious what folks think?

  • Blxter@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    1 year ago

    My understanding is that it is a complete game with no microtransactions to shove along with it. After that I believe it is because it is really really good and not a common genre to get the spot light. Mainly the first part.

    • seedoubleyou@lemmy.seedoubleyou.me
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think its based on timing with the state of the game industry being fascinated with various versions of P2W and how to squeeze more out of gamers through monetization of both ‘nice to have’ and ‘need to have.’ Larian and BG3 are a breath of fresh air when all the others are prioritizing greed over quality.

      If we could just overcome our addictions and vote with our wallet, EA, Blizzard, Activision, M$, etc. would eventually learn, but we can’t, and this is the true sad part of the story.

      • smoothbrain coldtakes@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s just a really good game. It’s complete, unlike the majority of things being released these days. The lack of monetization is really nice, but ultimately the fact that it’s basically an automatic dungeon master for 5e with compatibility for up to four cooperative players makes it the easiest entry point into Dungeons and Dragons in general. You can enjoy it by yourself solo and have a wild campaign that’s totally different than the group campaign you play with your friends.

        I’ve always hesitated stepping into the dungeon master role because I’ve always wanted to help tell a story, but this negates the need for me to lead anything and I can bring friends with little to no experience and we have a blast. I can focus on helping people with the mechanics rather than having to focus on running the campaign.

        • snowbell@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Do you think the game has appeal for people who aren’t into DnD? I keep wanting to try it but every time someone calls it “DnD The Game” I get a bit turned off again. Might just be because I’ve had awful experiences in RL with DnD though.

          • smoothbrain coldtakes@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yeah, it holds overall mass appeal. It’s a good roleplaying game that happens to be in an established universe with known mechanics. If you play by yourself you have more than an entire party’s worth of companions to learn the stories of, and you don’t have to worry about playing with degenerates or weirdos. Unless you consider the NPC a degen or weirdo, but thems the brakes.

      • coyotino [he/him]@beehaw.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        See I’ve been seeing this take in the headlines, but this doesn’t seem like enough to me. Folks have been sick of microtransaction-heavy games in the same way for at least 2 years now, and most studios (outside of the ones you listed) have been releasing games that are light on microtransactions. The System Shock Remake is a good comparison point - it was a modern release in a traditionally niche PC genre, it reviewed very well, and to my knowledge it has no DLC. I guess it didn’t release on console yet, so maybe that’s a key difference?

        • Ashtear@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Aside from it just being a very good game (a new game in the all-time top 10 over at Metacritic is going to be news regardless), if you’re hanging out in gaming enthusiast discussion a lot, there are a few other things going on that explain why it’s generating so much buzz.

          It came out at a lull in the release calendar. August isn’t typically a hot month for gaming unless you’re an NFL fan. It also ended up being a de facto console exclusive, so once the game started blowing up, the usual console war chatter spun up with it.

          The other dimension–and one that surprised me–is it fed the “developers vs. gamers” spat to the point where it’s been making headlines again. As you’ve said, one price for admission games have been coming out more, but I think there are some sour grapes around over Larian’s successful graduation from AA by way of passion projects. I invite these developers to join in celebrating this release, as the success of games like these are bound to get more of the kind of game they’d rather work on greenlit.

        • lloram239@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The difference is that System Shock Remake is as the name implies: a remake, of a very old game no less. Baldur’s Gate 3 is a full on modern AAA game, with all the bells and whistles. It doesn’t need to hide behind nostalgia, it can stand head to head with all the other big games out there. And it comes as the successor to the Divinity games which themselves already were massively popular.

          Demon Souls might be better comparison here, started out as a rather niche PS3 title, build a fan base over the years, had numerous sequels and follow ups that all matched or exceed the quality, and Elden Ring is a gigantic hit now.

          I guess doing quality games for a decade or more just accumulates a lot of fans and positive word of mouth, so much that even people that aren’t hardcore into the genre get sucked in.

    • Lazerbeams2@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s also the reaction from other developers claiming that the game “sets an unrealistic standard for what to expect out of a game” despite it being exactly what people want from a triple A studio. Just a complete, well made, functional game with no microtransactions

  • smoothbrain coldtakes@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s a perfect digitization of D&D 5th edition - it’s like having an automatic dungeon master using the rules and regulations we’ve been playing with on paper for ages.

    It has a massive plot that can vary wildly on playthroughs depending on how rolls go, just like the real version.

    It’s four-player co-op with PVE in an age where cooperation is increasingly rare outside of competitive team games.

    It’s a well designed, properly built, finished product that can be expanded on with DLC, rather than using them to address core gameplay issues. (looking at you Paradox)

    • Vittelius@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure, but people were really mad earlier this year because Wizards of the Coast, the company that owns D&D tried to pull some licencing related shenanigans that would have massively fucked over the community. People were boycotting the movie a couple of months ago over that. It’s interesting, that Baldurs Gate seems to not be affected by this at all.

      • smoothbrain coldtakes@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah because Twitter is not a real place. The actual D&D community spoke with their wallets and they said “we like a good, finished product without stupid terms of use” and all bought BG3. People who don’t even play D&D bought BS3 to play with folks who do play D&D.

      • ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, I had already bought BG3 in Early Access before the OGL debacle, and before Hasbro (WotC’s parent company) sent the Pinkertons to intimidate some small time Youtuber into giving back some unreleased Magic: the Gathering cards that he had been erroneously sold early by a distributor. So I couldn’t very well boycott it when I had already purchased it and played like 30 hours of it.

        I’m still not buying new D&D books or MtG cards.

        • Vittelius@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          You don’t need to justify your purchasing decision to me. I am not even calling for a boycott of the game. I know people at Larian and I wish them all the success they can get.

          I am just surprised that this whole thing seems to be completely absent from the larger discussion about this game. I would have assumed, that it would have been at least a footnote.

  • zachary3752@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    1 year ago

    The short version:

    • Game is good, came out at the right time, had a lot of hype and lived up to the hype

    Longer details:

    • The game is just really well made. It’s extremely fun, very polished (except for a few weird bugs), and complete
    • It has a massive IP tied to it. This game had impossible levels of hype and it met those expectations somehow
    • The recent D&D movie was a large success, and D&D in general has been the most popular it has ever been lately
    • Divinity OS 2 Definitive Edition was very well received, people trust Larian to deliver a good product
    • People are sharing this game with their friends. They had a strong marketing push as well as really strong word of mouth
    • Final Fantasy 16 left a lot of us wanting a more traditional RPG after FF16 was anything but traditional
    • We currently live in an era of games like Diablo 4 which ask for a $70 price tag, and then also have a paid battle pass and paid cosmetics. This game came out at $60 content complete with no additional microtransactions. Ultimately that makes this game much easier to reccomend to people.
  • Glide@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s just a quality Western RPG, the like of which we haven’t seen since Bioware was bought.

    Good products create buzz; I really think is is simply that.

    • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 year ago

      That and it’s a tire-screeching exit from the abusive road we thought gaming was going down. Microtransactions, lootboxes etc. Baldur’s Gate 3 is refreshing from that perspective and, like me, I think many are amazed that it’s actually working.

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I see nothing revolutionary about a game not having things like microtransactions and loot boxes. Those are mostly restricted to multiplayer games, and the industry never stopped making good single-player games without that bullshit.

        • hh93@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Even a lot of the AAA single player games have day 1 DLCs with skins or 15 different deluxe packages for preorder or something similar though

          Doesn’t need to be the in-game microtransactions but it’s very rare today that everyone starts out with the same stuff in AAA games today

    • Ricaz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      DOS 1 and 2 were almost on par with BG3 imo.

      Pillars of Eternity was also really good.

    • LetMeEatCake@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most great games never get anywhere near this much buzz.

      I think it’s a product of the genre. BG3 is in the CRPG category, which had a bit of a resurgence lately between Pillars 1+2, Pathfinder 1+2, and (perhaps most relevantly) DOS 1+2. Good games in an existing category of game helps build up buzz in that category and more players. More players creates more demand… but there hasn’t been that much being made in the CRPG bucket lately.

      Then, on comes BG3. It fits in that bucket. It has much higher production values than the other recent games in that bucket. It’s got one of the most valuable CRPG IPs attached to it with Baldur’s Gate. And it’s reportedly amazing as a game on top. The last part wouldn’t get it anywhere near this much attention on its own, but in conjunction with the others it’s gotten lots of buzz.

      I also feel like Larian handled the early access part really well for keeping the game in discussion without making the game oversaturated in gaming circles. They got a lot of “free” (not actually free, but you know what I mean) marketing out of that.

  • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No in-game store

    The game isn’t shit

    People are beyond bored of 95% of the absolute trash that’s being pumped out by the asinine asshole accountants. (AAA Studios)

    It’s nice seeing something that isn’t even close to trash be released.

  • Feydaikin@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t think I have a lot to add to what was already said here.

    But I will say that the Baldurs Gate series already had a pretty big following. It had an established fan-base, like Fallout. But unlike Fallout, Larian chose to stick with what people liked about the originals and expand upon that.

    So there’s another tiny reason to add to the collective.

  • bl_r@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m a crpg fan, and a D&D/PF fan. For me, the thing that makes this game so fun is it feels like a streamlined D&D session. Sure, you can’t do as much as you would like in a D&D session, but you can do 99% of what you would typically want to do.

    The other thing is the game is extremely polished. So many recent games have been underproduced, unpolished garbage with DLC/MTX shoved in and a $70 price tag. BG3 is a breath of fresh air. It’s not perfect, but the care and dedication that went into it clearly shows.

    I feel what makes this game so popular is the fact that the game is just really well made. The story is great, the classes are much better balanced than 5e, and the amount of interesting solutions you can use to solve any problem is just fun. Add co-op, and the game becomes a blast to play with friends.

    Considering the recent rise in trrpg popularity and fans of older titles in the franchise, Larian’s existing fans, and an early access that showed off the game as being fun and promising, I’m not surprised it ended up attracting a lot of players. If you have a large enough player base at launch, and an amazing game, I don’t think it is a surprise the game is lighting the world on fire.

    • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been telling people: it’s as close to a D&D module you can get in a video game. Right down to the banter between party members. It’s an amazing game.

  • Rheios@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    On top of some of the commentary here, I’d like to add that I think there’s a real chance that WoTC’s put some money behind getting it heavily reviewed/boosted, and so more articles about it and wider attention. That is not to undercut its quality, just that I think its layers of support. (I’ll admit there’s more than a little bit of my distrust of WoTC in that. Like after all their other scandals they need a win to try and suck newbies into the game after so much messing up. And I don’t even mean in the last year or something, their release quality for 5e has been abysmal for a long time.)

    Additionally Larian played the early access thing very well. Not only did they listen to their ongoing players, and even netted some “tried it didn’t like it” people back, it gave time for everyone who was perhaps too into the older isometric BG1&2 titles (like me) to realize the game didn’t seem quite like it was for them and not pick it up. So you get clear, mostly good(if outdated) information out there for people to use in researching if they wanted to buy it, helping to avoid a lot of the knee-jerk hate that stuff like Fallout 4 and 76 got from misplaced expectations that could dull the release.

  • essell@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are you aware of what a big deal Baldurs Gate series, especially 2, were when they launched back at the millennium?

  • mifan@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a combination of good timing, a perfect product and going against the direction of most AAA-studios.

    Though BG2 is more than two decades old, a lot of us still considers it one of the best games ever. I think quite a few of us have been eager to return to forgotten realms. That’s one group.

    Then there’s a group of Divinity fans (some overlapping the old BG group) waiting for Larians next RPG.

    Those two groups would be the critical mass for creating hype. Would the game live up to the old games? Would it be as good as Divinty?

    Then comes the first reviews and people get to play the beta, and though the first few months were rough, once we got close to release it was clear, that BG3 would not only live up to its expectations, it would smash through the roof.

    Now you have your core fan base talking about how good this game is, how do you sell this to people who normally don’t play this type of game?

    Well, talk to them in a language they understand. This game is complete from day 1. No DLC. No ingame shop. Just a complete game that you can play over and over again with new ways of completing it… oh, and you can co-op with your friends. Even on the couch in split screen.

    There are simply not anything of major significance to criticize about this game. You may not like it, or the genre is not for you, but as a complete product it’s simply perfect.

    As a player you get the feeling that Larian focus on the game first where others focus on money first. That may not be the whole truth, but it’s the feeling this is creating, and hopefully other studios will acknowledge that there are other ways to do things.

  • Jordan Lund@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think there are three vectors going on:

    1. It’s apparently a super good game. I’m just basing it on reviews, I won’t be playing it until the PS5 version launches.

    2. It has nudity and is being described as “super horny”, so, you know, clickbait.

    https://www.pcgamer.com/baldurs-gate-3-is-the-horniest-rpg-ive-ever-played-and-i-love-it/

    https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/baldurs-gate-3-is-a-relentlessly-horny-video-game

    1. They are having problems getting it running on the Xbox Series S, and that’s blocking it from being released on the fully capable Xbox Series X. So nerdrage/console war clickbait.

    https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/baldurs-gate-3-is-a-relentlessly-horny-video-game

    • dom@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’ve also missed all the hype about the lack of microtransactions. That one is pretty big.

      And the bear sex. Although you’d think a sub bullet of point 2, I think its less horniness and more absurdity and “you can do anything”.

      It’s the modern equivalent of “see that mountain? You can go there.”

      “See that bear? You can fuck it”

  • EvaUnit02@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    As I see it, it’s a confluence of things which have captured the zeitgeist:

    • Larian D:OS games have been very well received.
    • Baldur’s Gate and the Infinity Engine games are beloved.
    • Final Fantasy XVI, the big JRPG for the year, is squarely an action game and some view that as off-kilter. Baldur’s Gate 3, the big CRPG for the year, is squarely an RPG.
    • D&D is a big property and new D&D games often gain a fair bit of attention.
    • People seem to appreciate having no in-game purchases.

    These five things, in my opinion, have pushed Baldur’s Gate 3 to the front of media outlets and, in turn, to the forefront of conversations.

    • AndrasKrigare@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Larian D:OS games have been very well received.

      This is a big part to me, in addition to your other points. D:OS2 didn’t have the same hype going into launch because (at least to me) D:OD was good, but not amazing. Given how well received D:OS2 was, I think the media was primed both to give it attention and praise.

      • HidingCat@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        D:OS2 was better? As you might tell if you dive into my comments history, I absolutely did not like D:OS.

  • usrtrv@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a great game, but so was Divinity: Original Sin 2. The main difference, besides the rules swap, is the cutscenes and dialogue animations.

    I think BG3 is riding on the D&D brand and marketing campaign. In my mind there isn’t a massive difference between BG3 and D:OS2 (or other titles they’ve done) from a pure gameplay perspective.

    Regardless, I’m for it. Hopefully we’ll see more innovative and high budget CRPGs.

  • ampersandrew@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I played but did not get very far into Divinity: Original Sin, mostly because I tried twice to play them co-op, and coordinating adults’ schedules is hard. I love how systemic those games are, but the presentation is limited to what you’d expect from an old-school CRPG. Shortly before release, I saw that this game retains all of that creativity while upping the presentation to the level of something like a Mass Effect, which makes it much more appealing. I hear that Ralph of SkillUp had exactly the same reaction to BG3. So, deep systems + finally catching up in production value and presentation.