• rynn@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I feel like all proposals that change how social benefits work should be benchmarked against why taxing the rich wouldn’t be a better option, laid out plainly, so everyone can see the lies.

      It should be illegal to propose anything that doesn’t include taxes for those who can pay them the easiest.

        • atro_city@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Great, fuck 'em. Introduce an exit tax. And they can’t move their houses or other buildings with them.

            • atro_city@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Germany doesn’t have a wealth tax though, right? There’s not really a reason for them to leave as it seems quite advantageous to stay there if you’re rich.

              • HansGruber@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                27 minutes ago

                That’s kind of correct. On paper Germany has a wealth tax but it is omitted since 1997. The story is a bit frustrating, surprise. The federal constitution court found in 1995 that property is taxed not enough. So it ruled that the legislative has to reform the tax until end of the year 1996.

                The government at the time consisted of conservatives and neo-liberals and guess what, instead of reforming they disabled the tax with the reason: We already tax high incomes with 53% so we should not tax the people more.

                Fast forward: still no wealth tax and highest income tax is 45% and many exceptions in inheritance tax. So rich folks getting richer.

                • atro_city@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  21 minutes ago

                  That’s fucked up. I don’t understand how the legally accepted response to “you aren’t taxing enough” can be “then we will tax nothing”.

                  • HansGruber@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 minutes ago

                    It is. But the court ruled that the tax is unfair… low on property. Well if we tax no one, every rich person pays the same amount -> 0 so it’s fair now right?

    • thesdev@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Well the electorate has to vote for that and they’re way too busy hating on immigrants right now.

      • B0rax@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Oh don’t you worry, they are also busy with hating the poor, as in everyone with less than 5 million on their bank account.