• DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Easily, with how much people’s digital download or streaming libraries are being stolen from them at will by any given storefront.

  • jobbies@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    CD’s. Already have a sizeable collection in storage and honestly never got the fascination with vinyl.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      large format cover art, lyrics on back. It was part of the experience, plus cost. You did a lot more research into an album when it was that expensive. Today, people just collect a lot of digital crap.

    • DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Mix MDs have a bit of a coolness factor to them, though. Even if they’re lossy audio.

      • batmaniam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Mini discs! They never really took hold in the US but I had one and LOVED it. Rewritible media, but better quality than cassette. Sony made a killer player that only somehow sipped a single AAA battery, which was a big deal for a kid.

        All hail MD.

  • slackassassin@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    Hard no. Hauling this shit around and finding a spots for it is not something I would’ve chosen if I didn’t already have the nostalgic attachment.

    That being said! Can’t lie I do still love it.

  • antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    Neither. CDs are only useful as a digital copy and 700MB is a quick download, and many discs can fit as FLAC on a microSD the size of my pinky nail. It might even be cheaper nowadays for them to mass produce 512 MB micro SD cards to put FLAC albums on them. If anybody wanted physical albums. It would be hilarious to just have a QR code on a tiny cardboard envelope.

    If we want analog music, which is a cool idea, we should replace vinyl with something better. We can still use an optical laser disc but encoding stereo audio tracks as analog laser etches rather than zeros and ones. That way we could reduce the cost, and increase the quality at the same time. Might even be able to print them on glass for longevity. Then you might have an audiophile quality LP that doesn’t need to be flipped. Also in terms of longevity - an analog laser recording could be reverse engineered and listened to after the apocalypse, while binary CD format is a bit more opaque.

  • DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    Vinyl, without a doubt. Because it’s analog.

    CD’s are lossless 16-bit/44.1 kHz PCM digital audio. You can already get that in file form. Why would you want digital audio that’s stored on media that degrades? It doesn’t sound any different than the digital file…it’s quite literally (not figuratively literally but literally literally) the exact same data.

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      There’s actually quite a bit of music published on CDs that is not available on any digital platform. If it’s not somewhat popular no one buys a license to distribute it. There’s recordings you can only find browsing the CD racks at physical stores.

    • Flauschige_Lemmata@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s easy to buy and sell CDs second hand.

      With most digital media these days you don’t buy the actual media. You buy a lifetime license. For your life or the life of the host platform. Whichever is shorter.

      • DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        That was always my argument back in the day.

        Technically when you bought any music wether it be 8-track, LP, cassette, or CD, you were purchasing a single-user license for the music and the media was just how the record companies delivered it to you. That’s why Napster and all the piracy that followed it was/is illegal, because you don’t own a license when you copy the digital file.

        HOWEVER… Over the many decades I’ve been alive I’ve scratched, twisted, demagnetized, or just plain old lost hundreds of LPs, cassettes, and CDs. Do you think if I requested a new copy of the music that the record companies would send me a replacement?

        No, they would not. So I obtained digital replacements by…other means.

  • FrChazzz@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    I collect both but have begun focusing more on CDs for their portability, price, and their ease of digitization. I’m actually in the middle of extracting CDs I recently picked up at the thrift store as I type this. I have an MP3 player and I load them on there, keep them on my hard-drive AND a separate back up. I still have CDs from the 90s and have had no issues with them playing or being digitized.

  • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    How about a new format: large optical media. That way, we get the cover art, lyrics on back, without degradation or wearing out.

    Audio laser discs.

  • anhydrous@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    I still buy music CDs, and rip them to digital media. CDs are a lot easier to rip to digital media, but vinyl is cooler, but I listen to local music mainly through strawberry media player (or USB stick in a car)

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    Vinyl is cool and cozy but I couldn’t be bothered. It’s a bad tech / product overall.

    Too much space, too clunky of a tech to not lose interest in a few months and I don’t believe there’s an audio difference a human ear can notice. So you’re just having a bunch of square posters that you sometimes look at - might as well just do posters then.

  • quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    I like the ritual of playing a vinyl, they require intention.

    Second hand CDs are very cheap and much easier to rip.

    I don’t collect either but when I buy something I buy vinyl, they feel more like a physical object.

  • Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    If I was starting today probably CDs because the price difference is significant. Ive collected vinyl since the 80s though and acquired the bulk of my collection when former vinyl enthusiasts foolishly unloaded their collections for pennies on the dollar to get cds instead. I dont buy many new LPs nowadays and stick to thrift stores and discogs bargain deals.

  • dumples@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    Depends on what you use it for. I love buying records and listen to them only in a specific way. I listen to records only in the living room with a chill vibe. I enjoy the intentionally of picking a record and turning it over. I lose that for CDs but do enjoy them in the car when I get sick of the radio

  • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    CD"s. I’m old enough to have had a vinyl collection before CDs came out. The first CD I bought was Brothers in Arms, the sound was revelatory, ditched my dozen or so LPs