• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    When you eliminate the “corporate veil”, liability doesn’t end at the person, but reaches back to the person’s business as well

    Get send you’re totally unfamiliar with civil liability

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Your arguments indicate an understanding of the concept of civil liability, but lack comprehension of the underlying principles.

      In attacking the “corporate veil”, you are undercutting the foundation of the relevant component of civil liability. You are tearing down the wall of separation that restricts liability from crossing these boundaries, while simultaneously arguing in favor of the restrictions imposed by this wall.

      You don’t seem to understand that these “two” issues are one and the same.