• JasSmith@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because I support free speech. That means protecting speech I disagree with. If we only defend the speech we like, we no longer have a democracy.

        • kandoh@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I support free speech but this guy clearly is using his speech to start violence and I don’t have to pretend to be too dumb to notice that.

          • JasSmith@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            What do you mean “clearly… using his speech to start violence”? The only people starting violence are the people starting violence. There’s no restriction on free speech for hurt feelings. If we only allowed people to practise free speech when it could never offend anyone else, we’d all be silent all the time. The entire premise of the concept is that we can express ourselves when it offends others. That’s the whole point. Free speech arose as a central pillar of reason, science, and democracy during the Enlightenment when the Church would hang people for claiming the Earth wasn’t the centre of the universe. Can you see why it’s important that we allow people to dissent, disagree, and even antagonise one another?

            • kandoh@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              A cute sentiment but not one based in reality.

              I’m not allowed to visit Auschwitz dressed in Nazi uniform. I will have violence used against me.

              I can’t slowly drive around a small town in 'Bama with a gay pride flag and a I VOTED FOR HILARY bumper sticker. I will have violence used against me.

              I can’t enjoy a Cider at the Cider House wearing my Make America Great Again hat. I will have violence used against me.

              In each instance I’m not hurting anyone, I’m just making those around me uncomfortable and anxious with my (to them) questionable views. Yet everyone can clearly see I’m looking for trouble, that the ‘speech’ has the unsaid addition of ‘I want to hurt you when I’m powerful enough’.

              It’s easier to police the one person doing the antagonizing than it is to police the millions of people from the demographic they’re targeting, it’s inevitable that a few loons will take matters into their own hands.

              • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                There you go again with weak arguments that don’t compare to this.

                Let’s try a different track: I’m asking you to to go to all of those places and do all of those actions. It’ll be more productive than either (good-faith) getting the conversation distracted responding to explain why those aren’t good points or (bad-faith) derailing things just for the fun of being contrarian.

    • kandoh@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      35
      ·
      1 year ago

      If I can’t walk down the streets of Tel Aviv dressed like Hitler then there is a problem.

      If I can’t drive through a small town in 'Bama with a ‘I VOTED FOR HILARY’ bumper sticker then there is a problem.

      If I can’t go to a Portland Cider Bar wearing a Make America Great Again hat then there is a problem.

      • lukzak@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You keep putting yourself into the position where you GO somewhere. Sure, don’t go to Israel if you’re a Nazi.

        Don’t go to Alabama at all.

        Don’t go to Portland as a supporter of fascism if you don’t want to be labeled as a fascist.

        Don’t go to a 1st world country if you want to cut off people’s heads for burning books. Don’t go to places if you don’t support the principles they’ve carved out there. It’s not that hard.

        • kandoh@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Don’t burn holy books if you don’t want sectarian violence.

          But of course the book burners do want violence, that’s the whole point.

          • lukzak@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Burning books doesn’t cause any physical harm to anyone. Someone that would hurt other people for burning books doesn’t deserve to live in a first world society. Whether it be the Bible, Quran, Torah, whatever. It doesn’t even matter if they’re baiting people into violence. They’re just proving that these individuals have those insane violent tendencies inside of them.