Lawmakers on Wednesday denounced the chief executives of Meta, TikTok, X, Snap and Discord, accusing them of creating “a crisis in America” by willfully ignoring the harmful content against children on their platforms, as concerns over the effect of technology on youths have mushroomed.

In a highly charged 3.5-hour hearing, members of the powerful Senate Judiciary Committee raised their voices and repeatedly castigated the five tech leaders — who run online services that are very popular with teenagers and younger children — for prioritizing profits over the well-being of youths. Some said the companies had “blood on their hands” and that users “would die waiting” for them to make changes to protect children. At one point, lawmakers compared the tech companies to cigarette makers.

Archive

  • PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    9 months ago

    At one point, lawmakers compared the tech companies to cigarette makers.

    Ironically, the republicans did everything in their power to protect cigarette makers, alcohol companies, soda companies, and the gun industry, and want to bring back child labor.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      LiberalGunNut® here. I’m pissed as hell with conservatives protecting gun manufacturers. Even more so with the NRA.

      They’re doing fine, thank you very much.

      Why the hell is the government trying to “protect” private concerns?! Small government anyone? If y’all knew what I know about gun manufacturing, you would scream.

      How many manufacturers can you name? Right now. Go.

      “Uh… Glock… Smith & Wesson, uh… I think Remington is still a thing?”

      LOL, I got 40 guns from manufacturers you liberals have never heard of. Turns out, it’s pretty easy to put a chunk of lead down a tube.

      Stop attacking the builders, attack our toxic culture. Sorry, went off a bit…

      • PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I grew up with guns, I’ve owned a lot of them myself, and I have both shot and been shot at in a professional capacity when my government sent me to a place with some very angry people in it. I even owned a Glock and a Remington and a Mossberg and those black rifles with two letter names. I owned a Ruger and a 1911 style .45. If I did feel the need for a gun to defend my home, I’d jump through the hoops to get an HK MP5SD because it fires subsonic and is easier to control, as well as easier on the ears when you’re firing inside. My favorite handgun caliber is the .45 ACP, because it has less snap than the 9mm and I find I am more accurate with it. I also qualified as Marksman with rifle and Expert with pistol, and I was on my high school’s pistol team.

        So, I also know a bit about guns. Thanks for asking!

        I ended up a research scientist, and wound up working on modeling public health and healthcare systems, so I can also talk about guns from a social and a semiotic perspective. Both are actually quite fascinating. My first undergrad degree was in military history, so I can talk about the development of firearms over time and how the different innovations changed the nature of warfare. I can talk about why American people think they need guns, and why the rest of the developed world thinks those ideas are utterly deranged.

        I could go on all night about it, but I doubt either of us would convince the other.