• Blibly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    What is this weird hatred of bicycles that certain people seem to have? It’s legit one of the best inventions of all time.

      • e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 days ago

        Unfortunately, that isn’t entirely wrong. There is always the few riders that think the pedestrian zone in the inner city is the perfect place to start their training session.

        • Blibly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          4 days ago

          And I hate them just as much as car-centric weirdos. Just a different flavor of self-obsessed dickhead

          • Hinterwalder@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Thank you. I feel the same way. I walk or use mass transit for 80-90% of my trips. I dislike bicycles. They have their place. Their place is not pedestrian streets in historic districts.

            • Blibly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              Their place is not pedestrian streets in historic districts.

              I don’t agree with THAT lol

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      My experience is that those are miserable people opposed to any physical activity. I’m sorry if my lycra gave you wood.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    The fundamental issue in a lot of older cities is that the road system was designed for pedestrians and horses, not cars, scooters, bicycles, etc.

    And it’s difficult to restructure the surface road system to add more road, because you’d have to raze buildings.

    It’s expensive to add elevated highways, because cars are heavy, but I wonder how expensive it would be to add elevated bikeways. That could let the bicyclists/moped/etc crowd get around quickly and gets them out of pedestrian areas and car areas.

    Bicyclists don’t like being around cars, because they don’t have much protection against being hit by cars. Pedestrians don’t like being around bikes, because bikes can be moving much faster than pedestrians. Cars don’t like being around bikes, because bikes slow the movement of traffic. Typically, the surface is designed around pedestrian access. So the only thing that there’s a lot of potential to move is the bikeways.

    • birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Bicycles are perfectly fine for old cities, public transit too. Scooters take a bit of adjustment but could also work.

      Cars though, nope. They clog up a lot of space using few people.

      Also, I actually like having bicyclists near. Cars not at all. People aren’t just pedestrians, they also bicycle or use public transit.