cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/51634640

A new Gamers Nexus investigation found a retail LG TV actively scanning the local network for phones, laptops, smartwatches and other connected devices, while also capturing microphone audio when the screen appeared to be in standby. The investigation found voice data being stored locally even after the TV was disconnected from the network, with the queued data uploaded once connectivity returned. Researchers also uncovered webOS vulnerabilities that could potentially turn the television into a remotely controlled surveillance device. The really unsettling part isn’t just the advertising angle. It’s the fact that a consumer television can sit inside your trusted network, enumerate other devices, access a microphone, store collected data locally and communicate with external infrastructure. Put that same device in a corporate office, hospital, hotel or conference room and the security implications become considerably more serious. I went through the investigation in detail, including the network scanning, microphone behavior, ACR, webOS attack surface, offline data collection and practical mitigations

    • silicon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      57 minutes ago

      Also keep them off wifi/network and you should be good unless they’re smart enough to try to connect to any open network they can find like some sort of malware

  • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I keep mine offline and fully turn it off via the power switch on the extension cord. My steam deck is my smart TV instead. Yay Linux!

  • Aqivex@fedinsfw.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Really makes one wonder…How many fucking data points do these assholes need telling them we’re too fucking broke for their game and want their heads on pikes?

    • Humanius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Enough that they can tell with a decent amount of certainty whose social credit score should be lowered, once that gets inevitably introduced /s

      (I don’t think that conspiratorially… It’s probably just data harvesting and extreme greed.)

      • foodandart@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        That social credit works only as long as you want to buy shit. If you’re like me and don’t even own a credit card, these assholes have zero power over any aspect of my life because anything they own/control, I wouldn’t want to use anyhow. They are only professional capitalists because the public are amateur consumers.

  • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    If you are going to have smart devices, put them on their own VLAN. They should not have access to the rest of your network. TVs shouldn’t be connected at all. Use a PC or android box if you want to stream stuff.

    • Humanius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The issue in this case is that they apparently use text to speech locally, store that information on the device itself, and then if at any point in the future gets connected to the internet for any meaningful length of time (be it by a subsequent owner) it will then be sent on to LG… for safekeeping of course /s

      The deep-dive by GamersNexus is pretty in depth.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6IFVTcM28KA

  • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    My LG TV is blocked from my network and always has been. However, the andriod tv connected to it is a different thing, so it’s more or less lost cause anyways and I haven’t had enough incentive to block the android box from the rest of network since it’d need some tweaking so that casting and other occasionally used features still work. And even if I’d block the android tv box there’s still our cellphones gathering all the data, so I’m pretty much just running things on hopium that EU offers at least some protection on my data.

    • potustheplant@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Well, if you watch the Gamer Nexus video, you’ll see that even if you don’t connect your tv to the internet, you’re still not safe.

        • potustheplant@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 hours ago

          If I understood correctly, the tv can connect to open networks it finds and transmit data even if you disable wifi.

          • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Mine is several years old by now, I doubt that the firmware on that has all the options enabled. And also I live in a pretty rural area, there’s no open networks around.

            But something LG has achieved with this, I’m going to look for other brands when I’m on a market for new TV. Which I hope will be many years in the future, maybe there’s a change on products while waiting and something better is available by then.

            • potustheplant@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Not to be disrespectful but your very particular case as an individual is irrelevant. I just wanted to share information regarding how scummy these devices are. If some people are not affected, good for them. However, that’s not the case for a lot (if not most) people.

        • micka190@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 hours ago

          It’ll scan for open networks and use them, regardless of whether you enabled wifi or not.

    • yaroto98@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      And according to the article the data collection runs even if it’s disconnected. So, don’t ever connect it to the network. As soon as you do everything gets uploaded.

    • UnLocoPoco@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      This would’ve worked just a few years back but due to shitty “age verification” laws, even TV manufacturers willl force users to create an account the very least for the TV to even start up. They may also implement an always-online model and they’ll justify that it’s necessary to monitor users for “age verification purposes”. ATP better to get a good monitor and use it as TV cuz cable or satellite boxes are either way gonna be provided by the network companies so that’s there

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 hours ago

        This would’ve worked just a few years back but due to shitty “age verification” laws, even TV manufacturers willl force users to create an account the very least for the TV to even start up.

        Surely only for “smart” features but without enabling any of that shit, you shouldn’t get any age verification prompt.

        • thejml@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I could see them doing it anyway as OTA broadcasts include rating data.

          That said, if it’s a family TV, you’re never going to put everyone on it, just the oldest one anyway.

            • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              What emb said. When in the history of the universe did consumers reject a product like that? You do realize Alexa and Google speakers are still very popular and tons of people wear watches with GPS, sleep tracking, heart rate tracking and always turned on BT?

            • emb@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              I think their point is that by and large consumers are stupid and willing to put up with almost any garbage like that. What makes you think otherwise?

              • credo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                Where is the original citation showing you cannot use a tv disconnected, without setting up an account?

                This whole thread is nonsense.

  • kaitco@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It’s not just LG. It’s all of them.

    And, the cheaper the TV, the more often and intrusive these settings are.

    It’s honestly better to just have a bare wall and a projector.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It’s honestly better to just have a bare wall and a projector.

      Consumer projectors come with the same “smart” shit as TVs these days. Just don’t connect either to WiFi. Problem solved.

      • undrwater@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Apparently not solved. They can connect to open (and hidden) networks without your consent.

        Per the marketing chief at LG; (paraphrased, from memory) “we own the glass, and we know everything beyond the glass.”

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          They can connect to open (and hidden) networks without your consent.

          That’s a wild claim and either I accidentally skipped a paragraph in the article or you should cite a source. Quick googling doesn’t show up anything of that sort for me.

          • undrwater@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I’m looking for a source as well. The “apparently” I used was supposed to cover the whole comment, but I can see how it didn’t.

            The video goes into detail, and could be staged, but comments seem to support the idea anyway.

            Amazon devices are known to do this with other Amazon products to create a mesh.

            It’s not outside the realm of possibility.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It’s honestly better to just have a bare wall and a projector.

      From a privacy point of view: yes. From every other: not so much.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Projectors have become amazing.

          Yeah and consumer oriented ones have their own apps and Google TV integration and the like, so no idea how a different image displaying tech would be a solution to privacy invasive TVs.

        • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          But they require dark room. Where I live in summer it gets dark at 23:00 so you need great curtains or you can’t see anything most of the day. If you have curtains you have to watch everything in complete darkness. This is fine for a movie night but people like to watch news or watch a game with their friends over some food. You also need extra device to handle apps like Jellyfin. Things like BT can be more complicated to set up (my TV handles multiple BT devices nicely).

          Projectors are basically great for one or two things (home theater and gaming) but are bad for everything else.

  • Zephorah@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I was at my parent’s house, trying to add some items to the smart TV. They started listening to these awful AI interpersonal dramas read by AI, on YouTube.

    My thought was to add some podcasts and their Audible account, for more selections. Maybe they’ll still only listen to that, even so. You can’t add much to a smart tv. No podcasts. No podcast app. A pretty spartan selection of apps. Even something as large and mainstream as Audible. No go. Libby? Yeah, right.

    I don’t get it. What’s the point? Just buy a monitor, jack it into a PC for media, and have everything you want minus this telemetry.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      jack it into a PC for media

      Even a proprietary streaming stick like FireTV would be an improvement because it only collects telemetry from the stick itself and not devices connected to other HDMI ports.

      • Zephorah@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        We’re fully Linux now, various distros per machine, so I no longer pay much attention to windows news.

      • UnLocoPoco@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Ah doesn’t matter. Dont use windows. Use a pi and something like LibreELEC or even you can run debloated android on it with the TV interface and a remote. Just get a BT remote or an IR receiver plug into the usb port. Either of them are pretty cheap

    • otacon239@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 hours ago

      My TV has no Internet connection, but does connect to my gaming desktop. I agree with you. There’s no reason TVs should not just be dumb displays. I do also have the Apple TV, but it never ever shows ads and is a one-time purchase. The day it starts showing me ads is the day it meets the bin.

      • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        10 hours ago

        There’s no reason TVs should not just be dumb displays.

        At least, no reason that benefits the consumer. There are strong monetary incentives to spy on customers and sell the data that’s collected.

        • Zephorah@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Once again I’m reminded of Season 1 of Black Mirror. Second episode? Worker drone is “home”, “relaxing” in his sleep cubby and the walls are a barrage of ads. Occasionally he taps to pay credits to shut one down as the rest continue, as casual as anyone scrolling in boredom.

          Or a shut down golden retriever in those old, now illegal learned helplessness experiments.

  • Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Bosch fucking dishwashers do this, once connected there is no way to disconnect them so I sink all its outgoing traffick at the router level

    Complete garbage

    • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yeah, what kind of idiot wants an internet-connected dishwasher?

      How about an AI-powered pair of chopsticks?

      • Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 hours ago

        In a perfect world?

        I’d love access to diagnostic data. Is the filter starting to clog? Is any part not working as intended? I’m a big fan of preventative maintenance, but also really bad at sticking to an arbitrary recurring schedule (e.g., clean the filter every 6 months). This could also be accomplished with Bluetooth and an offline-only app on the phone.

        In the real world? Nobody provides this, and the privacy risks aren’t worth it.

        I do have my dishwasher on a ZigBee power meter to 1) track energy use and 2) give me a good-enough estimate of time remaining by starting a 2h timer after it starts.

        • UnLocoPoco@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          You CAN do this with a few products of diff companies with the help of home assistant and plugins BUT many companies are pulling off support OR restricting features to its own app and giving free access to the bare minimum voa protocols like matter and all. I read somewhere on reddit that a robovac company had matter access technically but only the vac on off switch access was there and none of the other basic functions. For that you need their app. But again, still some companies do support all it’s features on home assistant. Many light fixtures, switches, ACs and much more support it. So yes you can run them locally BUT it all depends on the manufacturer how much control they are willing to provide openly

        • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          This could also be accomplished with Bluetooth and an offline-only app on the phone.

          But WHY! If those diags are important, then just put them in the local display of the machine itself.

      • Jhex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        exactly! it’s so useless they had to hide regular features under the wifi connection to force customer’s hand

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Why would you connect a dishwasher to the internet? Setting a timer can tell you just as well if the dishes are clean.

        • dragonlover@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          No way in hell id buy that. Soon as the app is dead so is your dishwasher, at the whim of the manufacturer

          • silicon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            40 minutes ago

            Planned obsolescence is great isn’t it. /s I try to keep my appliances on life support as long as I can.

    • fatcat@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Mh. What about… creating a guest network, connecting that abomination to that and deleting the guest network? Hopefully it can remember only one…

      • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        My TV is wired to the router but blocked from WAN access.

        Only connected to the internet to install jellyfin on it.

  • Bluedragon012@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I want to care… I really do… But untill ceos and those who decided this was OK are killed, it will continue. Money means nothing to these evil people.