Based on recent events, I would be in favour of such a rule.
Communities are not legal institutions. The rules are suggestions to keep the community organized and on subject.
Just because a rule doesn’t exist, doesn’t mean mods are powerless to react to content that breaks the social order.
Not everything needs a rule unless it’s a significant problem or common misunderstanding.
Be the person who caused a rule to be created.
Reposts 38 more times
I don’t know what recent events you mean, but in general I think such rules are overrated. Moderators can remove spam without an explicit rule against spam. Trying to list every possible behavior that a community would reject is never really feasible, we have to rely on human intuition anyway
Yes we do, it’s called “blocking”.
Blocking isn’t a community rule
Unless the mods have got the impression that the user is a bot.
On the plus side, there’ll be only one or two of those recent flood-posts left if rule 2 is enforced.
TIL you can break rule 6 as long as you start your post with TIL
