• lemmyng@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    213
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    [The signs] are placed along Hurricane Road at the last major intersection before arriving at the bridge crossing. Basically, there’s no way to miss them.

    The reporter overestimates most truck drivers’ situational awareness.

    • Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      117
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      “I paid the most money to get the best truck and it can do anything. Ain’t no fuckin’ sign gonna tell me my truck can’t do it!”

        • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          Every time i see these vids im just sat there thinking “HOW DO YOU MISS ALL THE SIGNS???” its not even just normal signs, it has lights, led text, a big fat orange steel bar, standard high vis signs on both sides.

          Just makes it all the more entertaining.

          • Malfeasant@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            13 days ago

            The most fun are when the driver approaches slowly, like you can sneak up on it…

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 days ago

            Wait until it happens to you. It almost did to me and I was entirely oblivious, so I can no longer blame them for being idiots.

            I was moving to a new city, but I had been there many times. One of the more useful roads was along the River, curving in and out, and under a bunch of low bridges: great fun to drive, plus I was really familiar with it. So, guess what route I naturally took with the moving van. Yup. Did I notice all the “Cars Only” signs? Nope, they had all faded into background noise. Did I notice all the height limits? Nope, not used to looking for those, plus I was busy trying to find my way around an unfamiliar area pre-GPS. I was saved by a buddy whose car I was following, who realized it and got off the road at the last minute. I still didn’t have a clue, but eventually matched up the height of the truck with the height of the bridges, and realized how close I had come to being on the News

    • JordanZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Most people are just oblivious. It’s not that they didn’t see the signs most of the time. It’s that they don’t know the height/weight of their vehicle and just assuming, eh it’ll be fine. I’m shocked how many people can’t tell me what year their car is…some can’t even tell me the model. It’s a Toyota something…it’s blue.

      • clif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        14 days ago

        I was at a tire shop the other day and somebody gave them the keys and said “it’s a blue Honda Accord”

        The tech came back confused and eventually they realized it was a grayish (maybe a tinge of blue) Hyundai Accent.

        At least they got the first letters correct, I guess.

        • Malfeasant@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 days ago

          My car was assigned minivan at birth, but now identifies as a VW beetle with a Porsche engine swap.

    • thesporkeffect@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      The driver suffered minor injuries but was able to exit the vehicle on his own. Luckily, no one else was hurt, considering the area is popular with swimmers and kayakers

      • Pogogunner@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        111
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        15 days ago

        The driver deserves criminal punishment in addition to the punishment of ignoring physics.

        • Abnorc@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          15 days ago

          Would this be a criminal offense? As much as it’s annoying that his car is so massive, he drove a street legal vehicle in the wrong place. Paying for the damages seems like a sufficient consequence.

          • bahbah23@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            67
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            15 days ago

            Not a lawyer, but I would assume that reckless driving would apply here. If nothing else, he should be liable for the damages financially due to negligence

            • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              21
              ·
              14 days ago

              It was overweight for the bridge, not the road. It was from a commercial trucking company, so likely a dump truck. The first clue should be that it was a F-750. There are pickup beds for them, but they’re almost always a flatbed or dump bed.

              • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                14 days ago

                Street-legal, bridge-legal, who gives a shit. The point is, they drove it illegally and should be able to be punished accordingly. The make and model are irrelevant.

          • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            14 days ago

            If the bridge had been just a bit sturdier, it could have been damaged jut to the point where the truck could have passed, but the next person driving over would have fell in and risked their lives.

          • lol_idk@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 days ago

            Perhaps the cost of the damage would add up to something they could try to make felonious

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      14 days ago

      https://www.thedrive.com/news/overweight-ford-f-750-plunges-through-historic-wooden-bridge-in-maine

      Repair estimates have not been released, but the owner of the truck company has offered to help pay for the rebuild. The incident itself remains under investigation by local authorities.

      The trucking company has already offered to help pay for it. It’s likely covered under their insurance and the driver is almost certainly been fired.

      • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        14 days ago

        What about the environmental damage of a car filled with gasoline, oil and other toxic materials falling into the river below? I doubt anyone will have to pay for the full cleanup

        • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          14 days ago

          Law enforcement fines the trucking company, trucking company files insurance claim, trucking company pays.

          Hazmat was probably the third for fourth on the scene after police, fire and ambulance and would have put those floating oil absorbers in the river.

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            14 days ago

            Yeah something like this isn’t some wild out of the blue occurance that nobody is prepared for. Any department of transportation of any acceptable competence level has a procedure for catastrophic bridge failure, especially by vehicular overload.

    • Emmie@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      You can’t charge a corpse

      There’s some nifty trick here to avoid parking tickets

      • Pogogunner@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        15 days ago

        The driver suffered minor injuries but was able to exit the vehicle on his own. Luckily, no one else was hurt, considering the area is popular with swimmers and kayakers.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Don’t know what the mom is complaining about. He didn’t know the answer and he did tell him.

  • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Read the actual article. This was a commercial vehicle that was hauling gravel. I think most folks are assuming it was some dumbass in a lifted truck with a few MAGA stickers on the back. That’s not the case.

    The driver is still at fault for ignoring the posted weight limits, but it’s not like he was driving a personal vehicle, as much as we’d all love to see a some of these massive trucks and SUVs go through a bridge.

    • zik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Can we just have a bridge that detects MAGA trucks and ditches them then?

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      To be fair, the stock Ford 750 looks like the douchiest pickup vehicle imaginable. It’s like if you had asked an AI to design a truck specifically for dudes with fragile masculinity and court-mandated anger management classes. All it needs is twin flagpoles mounted to the back, with the American and confederate flags flying side by side.

          • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            Sure. Anywhere near as douchey as discrediting this community by spreading that garbage non-sense about what an F-750 actually is.

            • yokonzo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              13 days ago

              Ahh I see you don’t understand, I’ll explain. See an actual considerate human would just say “that’s actually not the base model” or whatever you were complaining about, instead you chose to be rude and top it off with a cringe ass “be better”, the go to response for someone who thinks they’ve got the moral high ground but don’t wanna put any sort of discussion into it.

              You’re like the 2024 version of man-bun yoga hipsters, be better

              • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Yeah, no. You see, your suggestion is actually what I replied to every other person who commented that claptrap on this post. Its like, right there in my comment history. That specific commenter went so far as to outright claim those pics were THE stock configuration though, and theirs was the last such comment I replied to. They, and you, can actually, on second thought, fuck right off.

                I opted to be even slightly civil with them. Maybe because I like their username or I just had an off moment.

                You? You made the mistake of assuming I was being, idk, sincere or some shit. No, I don’t even actually hope or care that someone named “pm-your-nudes” even bothers to break character to make more truthful comments, so long as they’re kinda-sorta called on it when they don’t.

                Stop being such an insincere-dumbfuck-persona-apologist. Getting people to realize “wow, I was almost fooled by this insincere shit-post-teir bullshit that failed to trip-up this man-bun-yoga-hipster dude” is exactly the shocked reader response I was going for. Welcome to peak internet. 2024 is the new 1994.

                • yokonzo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  Aww buddy, that’s too much, I’m not reading that. hey, I’m going to block you now because we have disagreements, but have a good day though!

  • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    So some facts here:

    • Commercial truck carrying gravel
    • This was a rebuilt bridge, not a historic one
    • The owner of the construction company has proactively offered to pay for repairs
    • Yes, the driver is am idiot and made a mistake, and is probably going to hear about it for the rest of their lives.
    • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      The couple that were driving the truck died, and thier house was sold to a new family, who they haunted.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 days ago

      Gravel? Holy shit, that’s poor judgement. How can you be comfortable driving such a big truck over a wooden bridge, then add potentially tons of gravel?

    • Facebones@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      and is probably going to hear about it for the rest of their lives.

      As they should. They either ignored the signage and/or were oblivious to the weight they were driving around. Both major safety issues. They should have their license suspended for a bit and potentially banned from a cdl.

      This isn’t an “oopsie,” this is negligence.

    • DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      82
      ·
      14 days ago

      The idea is that it’s the base for things like a dump truck, a gravel hauler, small firetruck, or other large commercial vehicle.

      If anyone is driving one around as a form of transportation, they are probably avoiding therapy.

    • LowtierComputer@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      14 days ago

      I’ve used them for work. Some models can pull more than small tractor trailer rigs. Using them as a pickup truck is insane.

    • coaxil@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      14 days ago

      Jesus yeah did the same, hahhahah that is the most ridiculous emotional support vehicle I have ever seen!!!

    • SuperIce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 days ago

      This was work truck hauling crushed gravel. So it was basically acting like a small dump truck.

  • merthyr1831@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    15 days ago

    one less wankpanzer on the road, just a shame a bridge had to be put in harms way to do so.

    • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      yeah this likely means that the historical bridge will be replaced by a more sturdy and ugly one

    • teft@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      103
      ·
      15 days ago

      Damn. The posted limit on the bridge is 3 tons. The truck empty weighs 4.5 tons and they were hauling a full load of gravel. What an idiot. They better yank the driver’s commercial license because he obviously wasn’t reading any signs.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      The term Historic is being used to grab attention, but this is fixable, even it will take until Spring. The article states that it was rebuilt in the 70’s, but the wooden deck has almost certainly been replaced a few times since then.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 days ago

        Historic is also there to point to why the bridge isn’t at fault. Modern bridges can often handle such weights, but historic bridges can’t. Certain parts of the country have reason (aesthetics, historical value, and tourism) to rebuild and restore their historic bridges rather than replace them with modern bridges.

        • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          All bridges are built to their spec. They put Historic in the headline because it would grab attention, but the bridge isn’t as old as it seems. It’s wooden, so the boards already have to be replaced on a scheduled basis. It was rebuilt from scratch in the 70’s after an arson fire, but you can tell from the images that the deck boards the truck fell through is a lot newer. I should look up the bridge on Google maps, but I’m willing to bet that a modern bridge isn’t very far away and that’s why they can wait till spring to repair it with locally sourced wood. If it was a high necessity path, they could go to a hardware store and fix it in a week or two.

  • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    14 days ago

    Fun fact: school buses in the US are legally allowed to ignore posted weight limits on bridges. While this may seem particularly insane, usually on bridges the posted weight limit is not the weight that will make the bridge instantly collapse, it’s the weight that if regularly exceeded by crossing vehicles will cause undue wear and require the bridge to be repaired or replaced sooner than it otherwise would have been. School buses are infrequent enough (and relatively light enough, even despite the child obesity epidemic) that they don’t create a significant problem.

    On a wooden bridge like this, though, the same logic does not apply. I sure wouldn’t cross it in my school bus, but the height limit would preclude that anyway.

    • Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 days ago

      I was going to say, even if the bus was over the limit on weight for this thing it wouldn’t clear the roof, but then you said that at the end.

  • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    I swear to god, the Ford F-750 looks like if you had asked AI to design the biggest lifted pickup specifically for the dudes with fragile masculinities and court-mandated anger management classes.

    • NIB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      F-750 is sold for specialized uses, as ambulance, crane vehicle, etc. It is a commercial vehicle, not a normal truck for private individuals. In fact, this picture is a modified F-750(well technically all F-750 are modified). Normally the truck comes just as a base platform and then you build stuff on it.

      • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        13 days ago

        yeah, my dad had one back in the day. No extended cab, no bed, no fancy chrome trimmings, was the very front and a rear frame platform. He had a box truck style trailer on his when he was doing contract work.

  • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    14 days ago

    Cue car brains complaining about how their mini tanks must be supported by all infrastructure

  • watson387@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    14 days ago

    What an asshole. There’s no way they didn’t know they were overweight either. Maybe they couldn’t see the sign through all their ‘rolling coal’.

  • nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 days ago

    Probably thought the weight limit was a suggestion and not a hard constraint. Yikes

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      To be “fair”, with how material exhaustion works, it could have totally been fine, as the bridge only would have bent and creaked beneath the guy, and then the next, under-weight-limit car would have fallen in.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 days ago

        Yeah you can destructively overload a structure a number of times before catastrophic failure unless you go way over. It may be internal stress but it can be as far as shearing a bolt or two. But each time you lower the load bearing capacity of the structure, and once that’s begun the structure is on borrowed time and you won’t notice until it’s too late unless you have regular inspections

    • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      14 days ago

      The careful text-books measure
      (Let all who build beware!)
      The load, the shock, the pressure
      Material can bear.
      So, when the buckled girder
      Lets down the grinding span,
      The blame of loss, or murder,
      Is laid upon the man.
      Not on the Stuff — the Man!

      - Rudyard Kipling

  • Sway@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    13 days ago

    For once, an article reporting an “overweight Ford” causing a mess isn’t referring to a politician in Ontario.