Friend who is not a software person sent me this tweet, which amused me as it did them. They asked if “runk” was real, which I assume not.

But what are some good examples of real ones like this? xz became famous for the hack of course, so i then read a bit about how important this compression algorithm is/was.

      • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        It would make sooo much more sense for the ISO to set something up, and make governments each responsible for keeping it updated, since they’re the ones doing the changing.

        Require all participants to amend their law/regulations, so there’s a note to prompt whoever is in power and changes it next.

        I’m sure some places would still neglect to do it… Haha

    • Piece_Maker@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Wasn’t there also very recently a whole thing about the single guy who maintains the NTP spec threatened to retire so he could get a “real” job, which caused a gigantic internet-wide panic as pretty much everything we do relies on computer’s clocks being perfectly synced?

    • rothaine@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s also worth pointing out that this was sued in a copyright lawsuit some time ago. The wikipedia article mentions it, but here’s the slashdot discussion if you want to feel like stepping into a time machine: https://m.slashdot.org/story/158778

      It caused a momentary panic when everyone realized that this thing runs the system clocks for everything everywhere, and if it got taken down by a copyright suit it would be disastrous for, well, everybody.

  • baltakatei@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Based on my cheatsheet, GNU Coreutils, sed, awk, ImageMagick, exiftool, jdupes, rsync, jq, par2, parallel, tar and xz utils are examples of commands that I frequently use but whose developers I don’t believe receive any significant cashflow despite the huge benefit they provide to software developers. The last one was basically taken over in by a nation-state hacking team until the subtle backdoor for OpenSSH was found in 2024-03 by some Microsoft guy not doing his assigned job.

    • DamienGramatacus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I heard about that last one on a podcast and it was the first thing I thought of when I saw this post. Genuinely interesting story (if you’re into that sort of thing). The pod was saying how it’s both a flaw of open source that it could happen that way and an advantage because it was discoverable due to the fact that the code is open source.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      And those are only fully packaged user-facing software.

      I’d guess almost all of the Rust code for low level hardware access is maintained by a single person. Most of them once joined forces and created a standard, it had 4 developers last time I checked. The only usable cryptography library for C# has a single developer, and while on crypto, that meme got widespread because of OpenSSL, that had a single developer who spent most of his time on OpenSSH and other BSD user-facing software.

      Also, while we are on crypto, the modern algorithms were all created by a single researcher, that got famous for a work on how to decide if you can trust a crypto algorithm. Almost everybody uses his code.

      Anyway, that meme first appeared because of Javascript, when a developer removed his library (with ~10 lines of code) from the language’s repository and almost every Javascript software broke.

  • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    core-js (whose maintainer is also a bit picky about and probably doesn’t understand the OSS process) Phil Katz, the guy who invented .zip. To this day, every .zip file contains his initials in hexadecmial. His story is incredibly interesting.

    • Pyro@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      The core-js story always makes me sad. Sure, he’s developing an open source project and no one HAS to pay him. But the meager amount of donations and the tons of hate he receives isn’t justifiable.

      • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s especially sadder when a substantial amount of the donations vanished when Open Collective and others stopped operating to Russians.

      • Thomrade@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I had seen the hate before and foolishly just assumed he was deserving of it. Its a horrible situation he’s in and he is being cast in a bad light because he reached out for help.

    • Electric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Oh dear, that post from the core-js guy made my blood boil. He’s been taken advantage of by the whole world.

  • Mossy Feathers (She/Her)@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Furthermore, “RUNK” was originally made in the 1980s to take over from a program written on punch cards in the 1960s. Finally, it’s missing some important functions that the original 60s program had because "RUNK"s developer doesn’t see the purpose of those functions and refuses to add them; and no one has publically released a fork of “RUNK” that adds those functions back in, so you have to do it yourself. Thank God it’s open source.

    Edit: oh yeah, and back in 2005 there was an effort to make a GUI for it, but “RUNK’s” sole developer got mad because “back in the 80s we didn’t need GUIs; command line is infinitely faster” and kept intentionally breaking support for the GUI with each bug fix, leading to the project eventually being abandoned.

    • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      that really sounds like a case where someone ultimately says “fuck you, runk’s developer”. why didn’t that happen?

      • Corbin@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Because frankly, Ronald (the current maintainer, not the original author) is very competent. I say this as somebody who has personally been yelled at by Ronald at a kernel summit; I didn’t deserve it, but none of his technical points were wrong. I like to think of myself as the kind of person that, given enough time and documentation, can maintain anything; I think it’d still take three of me to do Ronald’s job. (Well, “job.” I think he technically works for Red Hat or something?) Not to excuse his conduct, just to explain why he’s not been replaced yet.

        • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Wait if it stands for Ronald’s Universal Number Kounter, does that mean both the creator and current maintainer are named Ronald? Is it a dread pirate kinda deal where whoever holds the hat takes the name?

          • Corbin@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            I’d love to link you to their Wikipedia pages, but both of them are redlinked. As far as I can tell, Dr. V. Ronald was an educator who moved from Canada to the USA as part of the whole Xerox PARC thing and probably was valued for mainframe experience; does anybody have a full bio? The current maintainer is Ron Sunk, who did a full run at MIT up through postdoc before going to Red Hat. The names are a coincidence; runk implements what we now call Sunk summation, after Sunk’s thesis. (As you might guess, that’s an instance of Stigler’s law, since clearly Dr. Ronald discovered Sunk summation first!)

            Also, as long as we’re here, I want to empathize a little with Sunk. The GUIs that folks have placed on runk, like GNOME’s Gunk or Enlightenment’s enk, look very cool, and there’s rumors of an upcoming unified number-counting protocol that will put them all on equal ground. But @MossyFeathers@pawb.social wasn’t joking; Dr. Arnold’s code literally only reads punch cards, and there’s a façade to make it work on modern Linux and BSD transparently. It predates X11, if that’s any help. The tech debt is real.

  • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Paul Eggart is the primary maintainer for tzdb, and has been for the past 20 years.
    Tzdb is the database that maintains all of the information about timezones, timezone changes, leap whatever’s and everything else. It’s present on just about every computer on the planet and plays an important role in making sure all of the things do time correctly.

    If he gets hit by a bus, ICANN is responsible for finding someone else to maintain the list.

    Sqlite is the most widely used database engine, and is primarily developed by a small handful of people.

    ImageMagick is probably the most iconic example. Primarily developed by John Cristy since 1987, it’s used in a hilarious number of places for basic image operations. When a security bug was found in it a bit ago, basically every server needed to be patched because they all do something with images.

  • Godort@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    NTP is the one that comes to mind for me.

    Basically every device uses it and until fairly recently was maintained by a single person

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    I mean, it was either Richard Stallman or Dennis Ritchie that created grep in an evening so that a buddy of his could do research on volumes of text that wouldn’t fit in the RAM of a PDP-11 (or similar machine. I’m telling this story from memory). It’s designed to do what you would do with the ancient text editor ed using the commands Global, Regular Expression, and Print. g re p. grep. Probably the most important piece of software ever written in a couple hours.

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah that debacle still pisses me off. Especially the fact that someone could possibly trademark and enforce a trademark a name that’s already in use. It’s made even worse that the package that now uses the stolen name is defunct.

      I hope all of the bad actors burn in Hell.

        • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          What did NPM remove? My understanding is that NPM restored the deleted package. If you’re referring to giving the author the ability to delete their packages, I’m on the fence about that. On the one hand, if it’s open source, it’s a part of the community. On the other hand, it’s also still the author’s code, and if they are the only author, then it’s their sole decision if they want to host their code under their account.

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            But at the same time if the code is properly licensed under an open source license (I would assume/hope NPM didn’t allow non FOSS code) then NPM can refuse to take it down. Yes, they put it back up, but I think it’s important for public repositories (as in packaged code repositories, not got repositories) to never remove things (barring legal requirements, sure).

            For what it’s worth, the policy they adopted after the fact seemed pretty sensible. I think it was something like you can’t take things down once they have ~100 downloads or x number of dependents.

    • magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Azer did nothing wrong.

      Laurie Voss made a bad call and should feel bad.

      The principals of free software was, is, and always will be more important than every single dollar in silicon valley combined.

      • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        No arguments there, if you’re gonna depend on a piece of code, you better own it or have a rock solid plan b.

      • TheSlad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I think he overreacted a bit, not to having his package name forcibly taken from him, but to being asked to give it up in the first place. Kik explained to him that they have to fight this or lose their tradmark because thats how trademark law works. His response was basically “haha fuck you”. He probably could’ve asked for a couple thousand and just changed the name of his project and everything would’ve been fine.

        • magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          being asked to give it up in the first place. Kik explained to him that they have to fight this or lose their tradmark because thats how trademark law works.

          I’m not a lawyer but from what I know that’s a load of shit. There’s nothing stopping a trademark holder from granting licensing rights to third parties, without charge, to use their trademark in specific ways.

          They chose not to because its easier, and most people won’t know better, so they roll over.

          His response was basically “haha fuck you”. He probably could’ve asked for a couple thousand and just changed the name of his project and everything would’ve been fine.

          This is the correct response, even if Kik would’ve given him money. It’s his package, he got the name first. Corpos can eat shit, just because its not the easy choice, or the choice you would’ve made doesn’t mean it was wrong. That package should’ve stayed down on principal.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      And they still get emails from randos when some program that uses curl doesn’t work (the Readme is top notch).

            • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2020/12/17/curl-supports-nasa/

              https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2023/02/07/closing-the-nasa-loop/

              Their process for validating software doesn’t have a box for “open source”, and basically assumes it’s either purchased, or contracted. So someone in risk assessment just gets a list of software libraries and goes down it checking that they have the required forms.

              As the referenced talk mentions, the people using the software understand that all the testing and everything is entirely on them, and that sending these messages is bothersome and unfair, and they’re working on it. Unfortunately, NASA is also a massive government bureaucracy and so process changes are slow, at best.
              The TLAs don’t generally help NASA, and getting them involved would unfortunately only result in more messages being sent.

              As for contributions, I think that turns into an even worse can of worms, since generally software developed by or for the US government isn’t just open source, but public domain. I think you’d end up with a big mess of licensing horror if you tried to get money or official relationships involved. It’s why sqlite is public domain, since it was developed at the behest of the US.

              Mostly just context for what you said. NASA isn’t being arrogant, they’re being gigantic. Doing their due diligence in-house while another branch goes down a checklist, sees they don’t have a form and pops of an email and embarrassing the hell out of the first group.

              The time limit thing is weird, but it’s a common practice in bureaucracies, public or private. You stick a timeline on the request to convey your level of urgency and the establish some manner of timeline for the other person to work with. Read the line again, but extremely literally: “we have a time frame of 5 days for a response”. “Our audit timeline guessed that it would take a business week for you to reply, so if you take longer we’re behind schedule”. The threatening version is “your response is required on or before five business days from the date of this message”.
              The presumption is that the person on the other end is also working through a task queue that they don’t have much personal investment in, and is generally good natured, so you’re telling them “I don’t expect you to jump on this immediately, but wherever you can find a moment to reply this week would keep anyone from bothering me, and me from needing to send another email or trying to find a phone number”

    • refalo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      curl is most definitely not developed solely by one person though, it has thousands of contributors. in fact, there is so much red tape around curl that you can’t even discuss making a change to it without first writing an RFC and having it approved by a committee.

    • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Libcurl is at the foundation of almost all networking.

      That’s not remotely true, but it is nevertheless outstanding work and very much deserving of recognition and support.

    • oldfart@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      The curl author writes a lot about his struggles, but he’s also employed to maintain curl, so not really a good example

  • Sparky@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Idk who needs to know this, but in Norwegian “runke” means to jerk off. “runk” is the word you add a prefix to in conjugation to get the different inflections

    • runke - jerk off
    • runker - jerking off
    • runket - jerked off

    Etc…

  • Angel Mountain@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Git, by Linus? Maybe even linux itself? Ok actually Linus might just be Steve Wozniak without an annoying Steve Jobs guy next to him, while actually being a lot bigger than Apple maybe?

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s really hard to imagine a world without Git. If it hadn’t been invented I think it would have been necessary to create it it’s one of those things that’s hard to imagine and then impossible to work out how you can survive without it.

      Yet the vast majority of the world probably don’t even know what it is, and wouldn’t even understand it if it was explained to them.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        t’s really hard to imagine a world without Git

        I’ve lived it.

        • CriticalFile.vbs
        • CriticalFile.V2.vbs
        • CripicalFile.V2.5.vbs
        • CriticalFile.DONOTEDIT.txt
        • _Old.CriticalFile.aspx
        • LinkToCriticalFilesFold.lnk
        • GuideToDeploying.CriticalFliles.doc
        • CritFil.bat
      • marcos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Everybody would use Mercurial, since Fossil completely lost the race, and both Subversion and CVS are unfit for today’s needs.

        What is too bad, because Fossil would be much more productive than Git or Mercurial if the software just finished running at all; and Mercurial is way easier to learn than Git.

      • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Git is not the only version control software out there, and not the first one either.

        Facebook for example is famous for not using git. Because their own modified copy of mercurial fits their needs better.

        Microsoft didn’t use git until relatively recently either. They had to make some big contributions to make it work for their system.

        • mesamunefire@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I remember those days. I used mercurial and svn. And file locking in other solutions.

          I’m so happy with git.

        • refalo@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          their own modified copy of mercurial fits their needs better

          The version I heard was that hg people were way nicer to them and very much willing to help compared to git.

          I feel like Linus got a taste of his own medicine dealing with Gtk and Gnome people while developing Subsurface and that caused them to switch to Qt.

          • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Th devs at my current organization use turtle svn, but that seems to be more down to organizational politics combined with a misunderstanding that git is platform agnostic rather than anything based on merits

      • Jarix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Really easy to imagine that world to most people. Like me. Who inspite of using computers since my 386sx family pc, never got into software engineering.

        I understand a little about it, but its just a name of a thing i dont know how to use lol

        I just find it funny how its a kind of ignorance(for entirely understandable reasons)is bliss situation to me, but a horror to those who use it

      • mke@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah, and Linus mostly handed off the project to Junio Hamano quite early on (same year, 2005). Seriously, huge kudos to Junio for all his work. Still, it’s fun to say this quirky guy who likes penguins started not one, but two free software projects that took the world by storm. Humbling, even.