• corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    This piece has no real point. No hidden info, no resolution, no exposé, no call-to-arms really.

    It’s just “there are way too many apps”, which we already knew.

    What a weak article.

    • locuester@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 minutes ago

      It’s behind a paywall for me. Good to hear I don’t have to bother with an archive link

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It used to be a sort of second-rate New Yorker, except now The New Yorker is a second-rate New Yorker.

        Harper’s is still decent though. It’s pretty much how it’s been for years.

  • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    This is partly corporate greed and partly a failure of the Web. A website should be all you need. You shouldn’t need a separate app for every little thing.

    • Trailblazing Braille Taser@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It’s not a failure of the web, it’s a failure of corporations to accept their place as just a tab in my browser. It’s also easier to track users, exploit vulnerabilities, etc. from within a mobile app.

      • s_s@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Also, push notifications. Most things could be done from a browser, but corpos have to have their push notifications.

        It doesn’t matter if you’re the guy who turns every notification off and manages all those… 9/10 people won’t.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      If all I’m doing is looking at your catalog, it should work in a mobile browser. That way if I - a Tarheel - find myself in the midwest, I can go “does Menards have 1/4-20 hanger bolts?”

      I’ll install an app if it runs mainly on my phone, like a media player or a calculator or maybe even a file viewer. Mobile games…that ship has sunk, frankly.

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    A huge number of apps these days are web sites compiled into an app, and it shows. For example, an app should be able to remember your address and payment information without signing into an account, yet so many don’t. Almost like they want to force you into signing up. Why might that be?

    Just give me a mobile web page if you’re going to do that shit.

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I have an app for my sprinkler system and it’s a fucking nightmare. Not only is it basically just a web API, it’s so transparently just a glorified browser with access to exactly one site that frequently my phone thinks that app will work for whatever else I’m trying to open.

      Document? Sprinkler app. Web Page? Sprinkler app. Installing from a source other than Google? Oh you better believe the sprinkler app can do that.

      Doing anything takes longer to load than it would take me to walk from anywhere on my property to the fucking box and hit whatever button I need to hit.

      It frequently forgets what I entered for preferences. I can tell it a week ahead what days I want it to skip but if I do that more than 24 hours on advance I might as well not have done it at all.

      Oh you want to make a payment online? Let your sprinklers do that for you. YouTube video? Sprinkler app. YouTube video about fixing your fucking sprinkler system? Sprinkler app.

      Apparently the one thing it can’t do is effectively manage my water usage. It’s ONE job

      • x00za@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 minutes ago

        I think all of this stuff is just a big fad. Many people have already been switching back to “dumb” devices.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        Document? Sprinkler app. Web Page? Sprinkler app. Installing from a source other than Google? Oh you better believe the sprinkler app can do that.

        Android apps tell the system which URLs they can open. If you click a Google Maps link, it can prompt you to open it in the Google Maps app. It sounds like whoever created the sprinkler app misconfigured the app and it’s saying that it can open all URLs, not just the URLs it cares about. They probably read a tutorial about how to make a webview in Android and didn’t know what they were doing :)

        • Wogi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Almost certainly. If the guy who was making yandere simulator was tasked with a sprinkler app, it wouldn’t be much worse than it currently is.

          I don’t know shit about fuck when it comes to programming, but I know bad programming when I see it.

          • locuester@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 minutes ago

            I don’t know shit about fuck when it comes to programming, but I know bad programming when I see it.

            Thanks for this! I often wonder if non-programmers can see this. Such horrible programmers. And embarrassingly low bar for company outsourced it.

            Some find it scary that AI might take programmers’ jobs. I like to think that it’s these type programmers being replaced, and I’m kinda keen on having that.

      • forrcaho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Is it actually opening up the Sprinkler app for all those other purposes, or giving you a choice dialog? If it’s actually opening up the app, maybe installing Intent Intercept would at least make it a choice dialog, as it also tries to open everything (just to show information about the request; it’s a dev tool).

        • Wogi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I have never actually tried, it’s just suggesting it as an app that can do those things.

          • forrcaho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            So, giving you what I called the choice dialog. That makes sense. Intent intercept wouldn’t help then, it would just give you one more basically irrelevant choice to do all the things (although it’s useful for developers).

            • Wogi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              I’m sure it can’t actually do any of those things, but it would be nice if it would stop suggesting that it could when I try to open up certain things

        • Wogi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          If I could rip that thing off the wall and replace it with a spigot I would.

          My wife wants it, and she cares more about the grass than I do.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Just give me a mobile web page if you’re going to do that shit.

      There’s some apps that just load a site, but the site refuses to load if you load it in a regular browser? Why?? Spoofing the user-agent would probably work around that, but I haven’t tried.

  • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Just yesterday, Mrs. Warp Core was trying to enroll with an online service. The self-service email confirmation link refused to function correctly in Firefox on a desktop operating system (Windows in this case). It worked flawlessly on Firefox+iOS. Said link also shuttled the user straight off to the phone app.

    I’ll add that nearly ever other aspect of their public facing web, including the online chat support, worked flawlessly everywhere I tried it. This all just reeked of hostile design.

    When asked about why this is, I simply said:

    The browser provides good security and choice for the user. Apps provide good security and control for the vendor.

  • JollyG@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Used get my haircut at one of those “no appointment needed” haircut chains. Then they got an app, and every time I went it was “Why aren’t you using the app? You need to use the app. Next time use the app. Download the app on your phone. It’s gonna be an hour wait because you didn’t use the app.”

    Now I just go to a local place.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I just cut my own hair.

      But yeah, this trend is frustrating. When I get food from Jimmy Johns or a handful of other quick meal places, they bring up the app every single time. Yeah, I could get a free sandwich or whatever occasionally, but I really don’t want yet another app on my device. If that choice resulted in a worse experience, I’d find a different service.

    • toastal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      14 hours ago

      This is what CalDAV is for. We don’t need apps. We don’t need Calendly or Google Calendar or some BS.

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        As someone who needs to let other people schedule time on my calendar without wanting to give them every detail about my personal life I find Calendly to be incredibly useful. But I direct everyone to their website instead of the app, which I’ve never used.

            • toastal@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              13 hours ago

              I mean most calendar apps like the default in LineageOS & ikhal aggregate calendars & have a simple selection + coloring for the two calendars. It isn’t rocket surgery.

              • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                13 hours ago

                Okay, now how do I get that second calendar’s availability to someone who isn’t using CalDAV so we’re not playing email ping-pong trying to find a time to meet?

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Open source social media app: 30MB full size.

    Privative social media app: 300MB install + 500 MG data full size 700MG

    Go figure. I could have thousand of apps. If they were not packed with intrusive software to get all my data and to lock the company IP.

    • yonder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I use the Voyager Web App lol, only gotta store browser cache and cookies. Take that private social media!

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    I just go without.

    the overwhelming majority of apps are nothing but websites wrapped in apps that strip away all the privacy and protections anyway, and demand far to many permissions for shit that are completely irrelevant to their purpose (because they want to siphon literally everything out of your phone and monetize the information).

    I’d rather miss a deal, a sale, or whatever, than to deal with that shit.

    • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      well it is not just that, websites stopped working properly. I almost always run into a problem trying to book a ticket from an airline company’s website.

      • pixelscript@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I recently had a rather baffling experience trying to preemptively avoid this by downloading the stupid app right away, only to discover I needed the website version anyway.

        I was attempting to add my Known Traveler Number to an already booked trip with Southwest Airlines, booked by someone else. I was able to link the trip to my account right away in the app, no issue. And I could see the KTN field for my ticket sitting there, empty, greyed-out, and not interactible. I opened up the moble version of their website, completely unsurprised to find it was identical to the app, except for the detail that the KTN field there was functional. Put in the information, changes reflected in the app instantly, and I was in the TAS-pre line that afternoon.

        Why did the two versions obviously built from the same codebase have two different sets of capabilities? Why was the website the more capable of the two this time? I have no clue. All I know is I never want to be a developer at a corporation where I’d have to be responsible for this flavor of trash.

  • ArdMacha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    What they mean is iPhones have pitiful storage levels for the huge amount of money they cost

  • madjo@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I wish sites that do have PWAs would stop funneling people towards their app.
    Especially Patreon, where patronages started using their app would be 30% more expensive for their users than patronages started through their website because of the Apple (and probably Google) tax. Patreon is aware of this tax but keeps advertising their fucking stupid app! You have a Progressive Web App that’s works perfectly! Stop it! Get some help!

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Twitter had some great outcomes when they rolled out their PWA: https://web.dev/case-studies/twitter

      Twitter Lite is now the fastest, least expensive, and most reliable way to use Twitter. The web app rivals the performance of our native apps but requires less than 3% of the device storage space compared to Twitter for Android.

      65% increase in pages per session
      75% increase in Tweets sent
      20% decrease in bounce rate

      yet they kept pushing their native apps, probably because they can collect more data through them. The web is way more sandboxed than regular apps.

      • huginn@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        That’s less an endorsement of PWAs and more a condemnation of how garbage the native app always was.

    • Kallioapina@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I have never encounteted a PWA that works better than a website OR an app - this from users actual usability viewpoint. They are a cancer, that sits right in between the worst of both worlds.

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I recently switched to GrapheneOS and decided to avoid the Google Play store entirely, and honestly, the inconveniences have been pretty limited. The only bank I’ve had trouble with is Citi, everything else (I’ve tried several others) work fine through the browser. Likewise for most services I use, the web version works fine, though occasionally I’ll need to use the “desktop” version.

    Some services just don’t work properly on the web, but most of the ones I used to use through an app work just fine. Give it a try, maybe together we can send a signal that apps should only exist when they provide value.

    • yikerman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      It still depends. I live in China and the internet here suckass. Every product, say taobao(Amazon), xianyu(eBay), Alipay(PayPal), WeChat(instant msg), banking, etc. that is crucial to your daily usage mandatories an application. The API is closed and the webapp has no functionality other than a banner with “go fuck our mobile app”. The only way to bypass these privacy beast apps is to live in an isolated wood cabinet with self-sufficient agriculture.

  • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    This is why everything apps are so popular in many parts of the world. Using a mini-app from the internet running within another app is far preferable to downloading a whole app you may never need to use again. The way they do it in China is so seamless even if you’ve never visited the business before. There’s never any special account creation or entering of payment information.

    Obviously it’s pretty terrible in terms of user privacy since the everything app has basically unchecked access to all of your personal information and habits, but the convenience is incredible and feels decades ahead of how apps work in the US.

      • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Web browsers don’t integrate to a single account and payment system, nor do they preemptively load entire websites before you start browsing. So you’re always waiting for actions to complete or for images to load which feels slower. Mobile websites also tend to be very bloated slowing things down further than if the same functions were done natively in an app. There’s also no consistency between websites so you never know when something will/won’t work nor how far away you are from checkout. And then to top it all off there’s browser compatibility, which is typically pretty poor for anything that isn’t Chrome/Safari.

        If a web browsers could really do the same thing all these companies wouldn’t feel the need to make their own device specific apps.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 hours ago

      This is why everything apps are so popular in many parts of the world

      What’s wrong with a web browser? I know it’s not as seamless, but it’s far less limiting and literally any company can create a site, regardless of their size. There’s systems like Google Pay that avoid you having to enter your credit card details on every site.

      • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Even the best websites don’t feel as smooth as native UI elements, and somehow browser compatibility is still a very common issue. Signing in with Google and using gpay for checkout is kind of close, but each website has different design elements complicating the experience while giving up the same amount of your personal data as if using an everything app.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Among other things said, you lose access to push notifications / scheduling which a lot of apps are reliant on.

        You could have those come in an email instead, but now it’s not personalized to the app or notification type, and if you’re like me, I actually disable alerts on my gmail because most of the things in there aren’t important and it was too disruptive.

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          you lose access to push notifications

          Web apps have supported push notifications for a long time now. I think even Safari supports them now.

          • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            Those aren’t the same, they require the browser to be open.

            I don’t know if that means it works with a tab in the background though if the browser is open but you aren’t on their page, but it’d make sense if it did work that way.

            Edit: Further looking at this, maybe that’s just on Android. They might work on iOS as expected but only if you add the web app to your home screen as an app, and that’s only in 2023 when iOS 16.4 was released.

            Edit: Okay it looks like it should work on Android too, I saw some older stuff. I’m seeing some complaints about delivery times though not being immediate.

            • dan@upvote.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              51 minutes ago

              It usually works well on Android. I use it on a few forums.

              I’m seeing some complaints about delivery times though not being immediate.

              That’s the same with every Android app, though. When you’re not actively using your phone, some apps are put to sleep, which also stops their notifications. Very common on Samsung phones especially. You can usually add an app (or installed PWA) to a list of apps that you don’t want to sleep.