I’m never putting one of these in my home.
Would’ve been newsworthy if it wasn’t the case
Of course they are. If you are surprised by this, then you are an idiot.
I work for Amazon.
This has been the case for many years. Amazon has used AI in Alexa and other services for many years as primary providers, and has told it’s users it’s used it’s data for as long. We’re talking from close to inception here, so 6-7 years, at least. Hell, LLM’s aren’t even new to most big tech companies!
I’m all for privacy, but if you want privacy then you probably shouldn’t have a fucking tin can in your house that actions every conversation to a cloud service!
Not every conversation, just statements following a detected wake word.
You trust that?
Considering I set up one of the content types that relates to wakeword and utterance text analysis for Alexa, I trust it completely.
deleted by creator
But can I trust you? Are you willing to share the source code?
Edit: Tell me why I’m suppose to trust an internet rando?
You’re right to be distrustful, but there’s a fine line between a healthy distrust of a closed ecosystem and blind worry/cynicism.
Obviously I’m not going to share proprietary source code. Even if I did, it would mean very little without knowing the upstream and downstream services. What I will say is that Amazon is at least honest about what it’s services do, even if it’s in the fine print. Customers are able to delete their data when they choose to, and if they do, there are serious (internal) consequences when stuff like data deletion and DSAR aren’t followed.
Also, it would very little without also inspecting every chip on the board. You could have easily written safe code, but the audio signal could also be intercepted before it gets to that point.
Alexa doesn’t solve any problems and only exists to make consumption easier. It’s not something I need to trust because it’s not something I or anyone else needs.
There’s this study for those interested in knowing more about how often these devices mistakenly record conversations:
https://moniotrlab.khoury.northeastern.edu/publications/smart-speakers-study-pets20/
I bought an Alexa but I disable the mic. Do they still listen?
They literally tell you when you go through setup.
Harsh but true. We need some tough love in our relationship with tech.
deleted by creator
Because most people are idiots.
Ok see that’s actually a really good point.
Yeah, that’s kinda the point. They literally tell you that your voice interactions are used to improve the service.
I gItz NufIN Ti HIIIDE
I will be the last person to not have a smart home. There will be a banner over the doorway: “Welcome to Stupid House”.
There will be a small cover charge.
I’m with you. I hate how they expect me to control everything from my phone or with voice commands. I’m fine walking to a light switch or walking to the thermostat.
I’m fine walking to a light switch or walking to the thermostat.
When the hallway light was left on again it’s really damn nice to simply say “Turn Off Hallway Light” while staying under my nice warm covers. It’s also pretty swank to have the garage lights turn on when the garage door opens then turn themselves back off 5 minutes after the garage door closes. Someone left their closet light on? No problemo, my automation catches that and shuts it off.
Window coverings like blinds and drapes? Yeah, those are opening and closing automatically based on the position of the sun, even when I’m not home to do it. Did it rain while I was at work? Automation keeps my sprinklers from running tonight.
All of that is being done by Home Assistant and absolutely no Internet is required to make it work.
it’s really damn nice to simply say “Turn Off Hallway Light”
Can you use a custom wake word? The only reason why I’m still using Alexa is for the “computer” wake word.
HA doesn’t have “Wake Word” yet. It supposed to be coming before the end of the year. Right now you have to PTT (Push To Talk) to make it listen and for the privacy minded this is actually better than an always listening device.
Still, a lot of people want WW support and it is on the road map.
The last thing I want is to talk to a computer. Buttons are fine. The roboto phone customer service is bad enough.
When skynet comes online, I’ll die quickly, being mopped to death. You’ll have to struggle in the post apocalyptic hellscape where humans fight robots with A-10s for some reason.
haven’t we all known this since product launch ?
I think most people, me included, underestimate the scale of the operation. When you hear “company will use private data to do X”, you imagine what a reasonable person would do, like random sample a few conversations here and there. In reality they record everything permanently over months and years, far beyond what would be necessary to run the service.
It’s kind of crazy how we get this level of surveillance while still having software that will lose your data if you don’t hit
Saveoften enough.What’s fucked up is if you try to regulate it and make these companies have data retention policies. It creates a giant moat around them where no newcomer can have a chance to compete.
That’s because you are not enforcing data portability at the same time. Having studied and discussed the GDPR at length within tech circles, I became convinced that data portability is the ultimate right and the key to ensure continuing innovation
data portability is the ultimate right and the key to ensure continuing innovation
Interoperability in general is the solution to walled gardens and monopolies that harm competition, consumers, and innovation.
that’s fair. i work with data for a living so that probably biases my perspective
not sure how much they’ll learn from me screaming “you dumb bitch” at it
Yep, most of my interactions lately that are non trivial are just sigh-inducing. Smart assistant my ass.
deleted by creator
Noooo reaaally?
The new Amazon AI is going to be remarkably foul-mouthed. Every time it screws up (and it screws up a lot) I have to curse at it to make it shut up so it can hear the command again.
So who thinks this conversation here on lemmy isn’t being used to train an AI? Maybe not right now but later?
Sure the relatively small size of lemmy means it might not be scooped up and trained on. But the point still stands. All that is publicly online is food for the big-corp AI builders. And while Alexa invading your home privacy is obviously a shitty thing, I’m not sure we’ve all thought through the new relationship between us, the internet and the big AIs.
Well I know I have no expectation of privacy here, but I’d rather open source LLMs train on my words along with proprietary ones, than some company hoarding information and selling it to each other.
deleted by creator
The only thing an AI trained on Lemmy will ever be able to do is discuss the merits of socialism and talk about Linux lol
We always knew that. What they don’t tell you is your phone is also secretly listening. “Ok Google” <- turn that thing off too
An always on microphone connected to a company that is mostly known to exploit their customers and employees! Say it ain’t so!
Yeah, I realized these things are terrible about a year ago. So, I hacked them into computer speakers using some cheap amps and a 12 volt power supply.
And none of it has paid off because Alexa is still super trash
I love being able to dictate a grocery list but god damn is she stupid.
Good luck asking for cream cheese and chive crackers without ending up with cream cheese as one item and chive crackers as another. Or worse peanut butter and honey crackers as peanut butter and then honey crackers
“chive crackers with cream cheese”
“honey crackers with peanut butter”
?
The problem is that Alexa isn’t actually parsing the meaning of the total phrase, she’s taking each individual word as it comes. With that context, she would just as easily interpret your phrasing as “thing with thing on the side”. You’d still get chive crackers, honey crackers, peanut butter, and cream cheese.
Edit: I thought about this a bit more, and it seems to me the only way Alexa could actually understand what you wanted is if you said “chive cream cheese crackers” or “peanut butter honey crackers”. You have to implicitly make it one item and not a potential combination of multiple items.
Yeah I had the same realization as I was reading this:
you can not add Boolean terms and expect it to not separate it.So run on nonsense sentences are your friend and will definitely make the training from you so much more useful.
deleted by creator
Obviously. How else would it hear you say, “Alexa?”
I’d love a citation on this, outside of wakeword usage (a local device waiting for "Alexa* to begin recording).
Source: their ass.
Alexa devices use an onboard DSP to detect the wakeword and maintain a rolling audio buffer. On a positive match, the DSP wakes the main CPU which combines the saved buffer and any following speech and uploads it to the cloud where Alexa lives so she can try to figure out what you meant.
No audio is uploaded without being triggered by a wakeword. Also, the “mute” button physically cuts power to the mic, and the indicator LED is hardwired to the power rail as a failsafe indicator.
Oh, I know. For reference, I work at Amazon, so always interested in where these stories come from 😂
That was more for everyone else’s edification. I worked on a plethora of Amazon devices over the course of a decade.
Not going to get much out of me then, most of what Alexander hears is what’s on the TV or music I listen to. If they want to train alexa on that, their fucked
What about just a firestick? That uses Alexa
