• Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    “Calls for targeting the executive team, their families, homes, and places of work using a variety of online and offline means to harass, disrupt, and harm the individuals and the organizations have become widespread.”

    I’d argue that this is a non issue that doesn’t warrant additional attention, as it only affects less than 1% of the population.

    Instead, do more to combat drunk driving, that will have a bigger meaningful effect on the populace.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      4 days ago

      I would suggest the cops investigate health care companies so people don’t feel like they have an obligation to do something.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think a lot, or maybe even most of them don’t really care about effect on the populace, just the effect on the 1% richest of the population. It is sad to see.

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well, I think the majority of cops do care about their effect on their community. And I think the majority of cops originally chose their job because they wanted to protect people.

        But our system is deeply flawed and it actively corrupts people in these authority positions. And despite their initial reasoning, the road to hell is usually paved with the best of intentions.

        Policing in this country is probably even more problematic than our health care system (which is saying a lot). But it’s not because the individuals are bad; It’s tempting to say that, as it’s such an easy explanation and it gives us clear culprits to point at, but it’s really not rational. I think the true root of our problem with policing ultimately comes down to how our legislation works, specifically that the system isn’t robust enough to resist tampering from private and corporate interests. (And it’s tempting to blame the private and corporate entities, but this is also missing the point.)