• ChilliDownMySpine@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      One of his books explains it with 3 fingers on each hand and 2 toes on each foot - so a base-10 system makes vague sense for those beings.

    • Opafi@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not that a system based on base 6 would be strange. That’d be a logical system, too. Just as any other system that consistently uses a particular base.

      However, a system that uses numbers of base whatever but then proceeds to jump from one unit to the next one in completely arbitrarily sized steps such as 3; 22; 10; 8; 3 is illogical in any base.

    • nefonous@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      2 years ago

      Mostly because it’s very easy to make calculation on base 10. If i ask you to tell me how many millimeters are in 5.7 meters you could probably reply easily without a calculator. You probably wouldn’t do it as easily if it wasn’t base 10

      • Anoncow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        We define 1000 mm as one meter as we are base 10 centric. If we live in a base 8 world, we would have define 8x8x8 mm as one metre and the answer to 5.7 m base 8 would be 5700mm base 8 too

      • stevep@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s not fundamentally easier to do calculations in base 10. It’s only easier for us because that’s what we learn as children.

        If our number system was based on a superior base, like dozenal or senary, we would be able to do calculations on that base easily and would find working in tens awkward.

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 years ago

    Technically the metric system is “the preferred system of weights and measures for United States trade and commerce” as per the Metric Conversion Act of 1975.

    You’re just also allowed to use lbs and feet and stuff and most people do.

    • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The versions of imperial measurements the US uses are even defined in terms of metric units, so they’re less a completely separate measurement system these days and more just a weird facade on top of metric, even.

    • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Regan also never bothered to reinstate Imperial standards at the bureau of weights and measures (because it would have cost a small fortune). So our units are officially defined by the their metric counterpart. Legally speaking an inch is 2.54 centimeters.

  • Gleddified@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Base 12 is way more logical than base 10, I bet aliens would think we’re stupid for counting in base 10 just because we have 10 fingers, my opinion on this is infallible fight me

    • UnculturedSwine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Base 12 is as arbitrary as base 10 and we don’t know what aliens would think nor should we care. Base 16 makes more sense because it is 2x2x2x2 instead of 2x2x3

      • Derproid@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        A base based on 2^x makes the most sense since it’s easy to do conversions between bases that match that template. So base 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, etc. The limit would just be how many symbols can be easily remembered and instantly recognizable (need 32 symbols for base 32).

  • Orphie Baby@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Every time anyone talks about this, I feel obligated to inform them: there’s also a counting system that’s not based on ten, and it’s way superior. Do people know about it? Most don’t. The Wikipedia page stupidly calls it the “ten-plus-two” system, and there have been heated arguments there with the dumbasses who refuse to change it to the logical name. That’s how stupidly-biased people are towards the ten-based system.

    You make a “metric” measurement system based on 12-based counting and then everyone wins. Everyone. It’ll never happen of course.

  • ScrivenerX@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Outside of school I don’t think I’ve ever had to convert feet to miles or yards to miles.

  • johnthedoe@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    When I find a wood working video on YouTube from the states it blows my mind how anyone can not just adopt metric “This is 5” 4/57 and we need to cut it to 5” 5/45 and a half” bzzzzzzz.

  • dancing_umbra@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There are some places that do use a base 12 number system.

    Again, I wasn’t defending it, just explaining it.

  • UnculturedSwine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    Gonna take a shit on this idea like a good American and say dealing with fractions is easier than irrational decimals. I do like the metric system tho and I wish we would switch at least some things like temp and road speed over.

    • RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I never understood how it’s much easier to work with “three eights of an inch” than with one centimeter. Or how 6ft3 is easier to work with than 1.90m. The first one combines two measurement units and has very bad accuracy, the second one is straight forward dealing with fractions of itself and can be made even more precise if needed.

    • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem isn’t exactly fractions or decimals, you can present the SI system in fractions as well. The issue is unit conversion. If you want to go from centimeter to meter to kilometer it’s very simple because all base unit conversion are a multiple of 10. But if you want to go from inch (the rough equivalent to centimeter) to feet (rough equivalent to meter) then that’s a division by 12 and if you want to go from feet to mile (rough equivalent to kilometer) then that’s a division by 5280 which is a fuck-all number that nobody is going to remember. So instead you have to remember feet to chain and then chain to furlong and then furlong to mile. And this is just one unit in one dimension. For derived unit conversions the imperial system can fuck right off because it’s going to get needlessly complex.

      • Chuckle_Puck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I get your point but as an American I’ve never heard of converting feet to chains or furlongs? Lol sounds like pirate measurements to me

        • DigitalAudio@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s not what they’re saying.

          They’re saying that the only way you can keep neat and easy conversions between same-dimension units is by maintaining a lot of those deprecated units such as furlongs or chains, because by removing them, now you end up with complete nonsense conversions.

    • shrippen@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I doubt that very much. Just yesterday I checked out the product page of the new DJI Air 3 and compared it with the Air 2. One of the new features is a bigger sensor compared to the old one. So I wanted to see how much bigger it got. For some reason though DJI only lists their sensor sizes in fractions. The Air 3 has a sensor size of 1/1.3 Inch and the Air 2 1/2 Inch. To be honest. I thought shortly about that and then concluded I would have to do math to compare those two and did something else with my life. I know how to convert between different bases but honestly - why should I? This is weird! Why use random switching fractions for anything? Fractions are only useful to display numbers that would be hard to express in decimal. And that is mainly 1/3 and 2/3! Which to be honest I dont encounter that much in my life.

      • UnculturedSwine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m steel-manning the argument for sticking with US Standard. I think there is a lot more precision inherent in how the system functions that you don’t really get in every day uses. Even so, I would rather deal with meters and liters because I hate having to convert between the two systems and metric seems to have won anyway.

        • shrippen@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I really dont get why it should be more precise… Precision is dependent on my measurement and calculation. How can it be dependent on units? (if you smaller units as needed by your measurement and calculation)

  • RyeBread@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    The only thing I still like Fahrenheit for is temperature. There’s a wider range for the human livable temperature, so you get more persision. For everything else metric all the way.

    And yes, it’s 100% my American brain can’t figure it out in Celcius no matter how hard I try lmao. 10’s are chill, 20’s are nice, 30’s sind heiß. But in the end, I end up thinking Fahrenheit and going from there every time.

    • aname@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I am not familiar with fahrenheit, but celsius and kelvin allow for decimals. You can have as much precision as you like

      • flucksy_bango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m going to blow your mind, then.

        Look up the human body temperature in Fahrenheit.

        Turns out all ways of measuring temperature are linear and equally accurate. All of them have decimals.

        • aname@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I hoped ypu would have noted the sarcasm in the tone of my message. Of course every system has decimals.

    • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      What makes you think Farenheit is more precise for “human liveable” temperatures?

      The temperature is the same. Regardless of which unit you use to document it in.

      • flucksy_bango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Which is why I think any argument between Celsius and Fahrenheit is completely arbitrary.

        Like, the temperature that water melts and boils is completely dependant on pressure. If I follow a recipe I’ll use the temp they recommend. My computer’s heart gauge uses Celsius. I don’t need to know what it is in Fahrenheit to know if it’s overheating.

  • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Those aliens have 3 fingers. A decimal system to them is like a system based on 14, 196, 2744, 38416, … would be like to us - probably worse than US Customary

    • LiquorFan@pathfinder.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      No, the problem with the imperial system is not what number it’s based on. The problem is that it’s not based on any number. A coherent base 14 system would be easier to use than the madness that is imperial.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      There’s no good way to predict what base they’d actually use for their numbers, but there’s definitely nothing about 10 that makes it an obvious choice for an inter-species standard line the comic implies.

      • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        3, 6 or 12 would be overwhelmingly likely though, inferring from all documented human language families

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Everyone focuses on why learning metric would be better in the first place, and they’re right. No one has come up with a good argument for me to throw away all of my measuring tools, convert all my recipes and relearn an entirely new system when the system and stuff I have works for me now.

    • Squirrel@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because otherwise it will be difficult to live in a country that has converted to metric, presumably. While I’m not pushing for us to change to metric (even though I know it would be good), I suspect the change would be fairly easy to adjust to.

      • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        it would be difficult to live somewhere that uses metric

        In the absence of any plans to do that, what’s the advantage of converting?

    • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because it will make life easier for people coming after you, your kids off you have some or the generation after you.

      If you don’t do it then they will have to do it or suffer the difficulty of the imperial system.