I mean the election polling. Where she underperformed worse than most people thought, which exit polls showed her biggest criticisms came from being confused by her policies.
Dems weren’t confused. A portion of them didnt feel she represented what they wanted, so they stayed home.
I’m no high paid election strategist, but maybe solely chasing donors and republicans while ignoring the base is not the way for a dem to win an election?
Maybe running as a dem on a platform of continuing a genocide has some consequences?
I dunno. Who can possibly figure it out, right. Without reliable “polling” we simply can never understand what happened.
Got a source that “confusion” from having too many positions was the source of criticisms? Because I’ve seen other polls and they all had pretty specific reasons that weren’t about messaging.
Harris didn’t poll low though. And polls are meaningless anyway.
I mean the election polling. Where she underperformed worse than most people thought, which exit polls showed her biggest criticisms came from being confused by her policies.
Dems weren’t confused. A portion of them didnt feel she represented what they wanted, so they stayed home.
I’m no high paid election strategist, but maybe solely chasing donors and republicans while ignoring the base is not the way for a dem to win an election?
Maybe running as a dem on a platform of continuing a genocide has some consequences?
I dunno. Who can possibly figure it out, right. Without reliable “polling” we simply can never understand what happened.
/s
Got a source that “confusion” from having too many positions was the source of criticisms? Because I’ve seen other polls and they all had pretty specific reasons that weren’t about messaging.