If you are not aware, sportbots is a project that mirrors Twitter accounts from popular sport reporters, players and the leagues themselves. These bots are presented as regular ActivityPub actors, which means that they can be followed from Mastodon and any other AP service that is oriented towards microblogging.

With my work on Fediverser and the ActivityPub Toolkit, I’m realizing that we could do something similar for Lemmy. The Fediverser system could keep a database of these bots accounts and then map them to the relevant Lemmy instances/communities.

I’d like to get some opinions on how best to do this. Here are some of my ideas, in order of preference:

  1. Reach out to the developer behind sportbots.xyz and ask them to add this integration directly, to make sure that the bots post not just to Mastodon-like systems, but to groups as well.

    Pros: it can be very straightforward. No new bots being created on the Fediverse.

    Cons: the code seems to be closed, so we have to rely on the dev to implement this.

  2. Add the functionality to Fediverser to map mastodon/twitter/bluesky accounts to Lemmy mirror bots, and also map these accounts to the specific communities where they should be posting.

    Pros: Accounts could be eventually be used by the real owner. Open source.

    Cons: More bots in the Fediverse (not at alien.top scale, though). Not that many Lemmy admins seem interested in deploying Fediverser so far.

  3. Create a separate project from Fediverser that does what sportbots is doing, but focused on Lemmy.

    Pros: most flexible. Could be easier for other people to run it if interested. I would be sure to open source it.

    Cons: It’s yet-another project that I would be taking on, and I don’t have any more bandwidth for new projects unless they are guaranteed to bring some revenue.

Please, let’s avoid any “who cares about sports?” or “I only want organic content here” type of discussion. We need content here if we want to get more people to stay active and if you don’t care about sports or the bots, just feel free to block them.

  • Kichae@lemmy.caEnglish
    3·
    54 minutes ago

    There’s no lack of dead sports communities around. Turning them into dead sport bot communities doesn’t sound like it would help. Sports fans aren’t going to show up for that.

    Going through the effort of manually posting screenshots in the sports communities would go way farther than getting a bot to cross post.

    • rglullisOPAEnglish
      1·
      32 minutes ago

      Going through the effort of manually posting screenshots in the sports communities would go way farther than getting a bot to cross post.

      Sorry, this is a bit condescending.

      Go take a look at my profile. I have almost 2000 posts already. I’ve been posting 10-20 posts every day to all the different sport communities. Do you think that dedicating a good half-hour every day to read a bunch of feeds and sharing them is not already enough effort?

      I’m not saying that we should rely only on mirror accounts, but I’m saying that it makes no sense to ignore them. I’m not proposing to take just a random army of AI slop and put it here. I’m saying that we can look at the places where the content curation already has been made and replicate it here.

  • Baron Von J@lemmy.worldEnglish
    6·
    2 hours ago

    As the mod of a couple of sports communities it would be nice to have some more automated content being posted (like game-day match threads, player trades, etc). However, I have yet to receive a response from sportsbots to any of my requests for adding league and team accounts to be mirrored. I don’t think I’d want every one of their microblog post to show up in the communities, though.

  • spujb@lemmy.cafeEnglish
    19·
    3 hours ago

    No. Account mirroring and bot posts go against the essential nature of social threaded link aggregation. I see sportsbots is already a Mastodon project which makes much more sense because microblogging has a follow-the-user rather than a follow-the-community model. Lemmy is follow-the-community. If there is interest in this content, users will create a Lemmy community and post content there. Maybe they will even link to the sportsbots mirror. But don’t just set up a script to do it for you, that’s just something people are going to block.

    • rglullisOPAEnglish
      43·
      2 hours ago

      If there is interest in this content, users will create a Lemmy community and post content there.

      This is clearly not true. Content is missing and not everyone takes the initiative to post to help bootstrap communities. We don’t have content here because we don’t users, and we don´t have users because we don’t have content.

      Maybe they will even link to the sportsbots mirror.

      Which would be fine, except that sportbots mirror does not have a page of its own. It is built in a way to just push the updates to its followers.

      I had proposed to Lemmy devs a system to let people post ActivityPub content directly, but this was considered more trouble than it was worth (to them).

      But don’t just set up a script to do it for you, that’s just something people are going to block.

      Not everyone

      • spujb@lemmy.cafeEnglish
        8·
        2 hours ago

        Sounds like there should be a page for sportsbots then. Mirroring “hundreds to low thousands” of accounts to Lemmy just sounds insane and poorly curated.

        • rglullisOPAEnglish
          12·
          2 hours ago

          With approaches (2) and (3) we don’t have to mirror all of the accounts and we don’t have to mirror every post from them.

  • m_f@discuss.onlineEnglish
    7·
    2 hours ago

    I think there has to be some level of curation. I set up a queue to post loops to !loops@midwest.social, but I didn’t just write a script that posts everything. I use Loops myself and add things I think are interesting to the queue to be posted. It’s a lot of manual work, but I’m happy to do it for now to help grow the Fediverse, and I enjoy watching the loops anyways.

    You could accomplish this with more automatic curation, such as automatically reposting stuff that’s highly upvoted or has some other signal that it’s interesting. I didn’t do that for Loops because there’s a lot of stuff that’s highly-upvoted and is just stuff scraped from TikTok and I don’t care for those. I would probably use this approach if I didn’t want to wade through myself to find signal.

    • glimse@lemmy.worldEnglish
      5·
      2 hours ago

      You’re one of the big posters I don’t mind seeing and now it makes sense why. The way so many of the other top posters (well, two in particular but I won’t name them) post feels so…soulless. Either spamming 20 memes they saved off Instagram that day in 10 minutes or posting Reddit’s Greatest Hits.

      As much as I’d love if everything was OC, I MUCH prefer the curated approach to making Lemmy yet another bucket to archive everything from every other site

    • Microw@lemm.eeEnglish
      2·
      1 hour ago

      Reposting based on a signal sounds like the best idea.

      Because we kinda have the alternative in place: lemmit chose the way of replicating reddit posts onto a committed instance. That means that someone still has to manually go, look at - for example the F1 - lemmit, choose an interesting post there and cross-post it to the relevant lemmy community.

      If the repost into a relevant lemmy community happened automatically based on a signal, that would take off work from users.

      Could that signal be the number of interactions in activitypub for a sportsbots post? Or would it be the Twitter interactions?

    • rglullisOPAEnglish
      1·
      2 hours ago

      I’m old enough to remember when Reddit had a built-in RSS feed reader. You could add the RSS feeds you’d like to follow and it would present it to you on a separate page. But the cool thing is that you could up/downvote it like any other link. This meant that every blog entry could become a submission on its own, and all the user had to do was upvote it.

      I tried to build something similar on the Fediverser page, but to this there is still too much friction. People need to:

      • Sign up to the Fediverser site
      • Become a community ambassador
      • Add different RSS feeds as content sources
      • Get in the habit of visiting the site to repost the contents they think it’s interesting.
  • slazer2au@lemmy.worldEnglish
    104·
    3 hours ago

    Sports and bot accounts are 2 things I don’t want in Lemmy. More so if the data source is from a Nazi owned platform.

    If the bridge happens between Twatter (at some point we should just start calling it swastter) and mstd then use the existing integration with hashtags to bridge the content to Lemmy.

  • Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    4·
    3 hours ago

    How would it work, in terms of number of bots? Would it be one bot per mirrored account?

    If they only post to relevant communities (such as !Football@lemm.ee or !nba@lemmy.world ), that could help to have more activity.

    There would probably need to be some fine-tuning about the number of posts. Some reporters post a lot, that could potentially flood those communities.

    • rglullisOPAEnglish
      31·
      3 hours ago

      Would it be one bot per mirrored account?

      Yes. There is no information on sportbots about how many accounts they have listed, but I’m guess it’s in the “high hundreds - low thousands” range.

      There would probably need to be some fine-tuning about the number of posts. Some reporters post a lot, that could potentially flood those communities.

      With options (2) and (3), I could come up with strategies to solve this. We could, e.g, repost only what has reached a certain number of likes on Twitter, or limit one bot to post only once per hour/day. Etc.

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.orgEnglish
        5·
        2 hours ago

        There is no information on sportbots about how many accounts they have listed, but I’m guess it’s in the “high hundreds - low thousands” range.

        That’s way too many bots for people to block. Yes, I’m aware there’s a setting to block all bots, but that’s too all or nothing.

        If you insist on going that route, maybe stand up a dedicated instance like one of the other repost instances (and only post to local communities there) so people can just block that instance.

        • rglullisOPAEnglish
          2·
          2 hours ago

          Yeap, all of the alternatives assume would be set under the same domain, or at most just broken down by sport.

      • Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        3·
        3 hours ago

        With options (2) and (3), I could come up with strategies to solve this. We could, e.g, repost only what has reached a certain number of likes on Twitter, or limit one bot to post only once per hour/day. Etc.

        That would be nice!

        • jqubed@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          2 hours ago

          Something like that going to relevant communities and only posting more popular things might work. I don’t want to see every Adam Schefter post in c/NFL, for example. I guess to some extent we could rely on the sorting algorithms to keep the communities from getting flooded, but it still could start drowning out the experience.

          OP, maybe somebody at https://fanaticus.social/ would be interested in hosting these? It seems like their goal is to become Lemmy’s sports home.