cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/40228347

The Supreme Court of Canada has struck down a Ford government law that restricted political advertising by third parties, such as unions, in the year ahead of a scheduled election campaign.

The top court ruled in a 5-4 decision that the law allowed for political parties’ ads to “drown out” those of third-party groups, infringing on citizens’ right to meaningfully participate in the democratic process.

“The information available to voters in Ontario in the year before an election must include the interests, voices and views of different citizens and parties,” reads the majority decision written by Justice Andromache Karakatsanis.

    • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      I would argue that if you don’t like the system you should work to change the system and ensure that all Political advertisements must make available who paid for it. Which to my knowledge is already a thing in Canada.

        • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Is it? Because we seem to be highly dependent on investagative journalists for that sort of thing.

          Who use access to information requests to get information for their investigations. Which you, as a citizen, can also make in order to obtain aforementioned information.

          If you want the information go and get it instead of being highly dependent on others to tell you what the truth is.

          • uhmbah@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Search “Canada access to information broken” to understand previous comments…

            • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              Search “Canada access to information broken” to understand previous comments…

              Search “Canada access to information” to find the portal to make a request to access information and find that it is functional. Which is the opposite of “broken”.

              • uhmbah@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                Ah, I see. It’s not about understanding. You just want to debate.

                No thanks.

                • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Ah, I see. It’s not about understanding. You just want to debate.

                  No thanks.

                  This isn’t, and was never, a debate.

                  You are just wrong. Take the L and walk away.

                  • uhmbah@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 days ago

                    Right. You avoid doing the research. Tell me I’m wrong. Then tell me I’m a loser.

                    Well, when I throw the L back at you, it means “lazy troll”.

                    Edit: LOL then they double down on the trolling…