His win is a direct result of the Supreme Court’s decision in a pivotal LGBTQ+ rights case.

  • Not_Alec_Baldwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    You can take anything and make it horrifying if you want. It’s either a slippery slope or reductio ad absurdum.

    This is a photographer that wanted to decline a customer, nothing more or less.

    A business should be able to decide the kind of services it provides. If I don’t want to bake a gigantic 5’ swastika cake I shouldn’t have to.

    At the end of the day capitalism protects everyone against excessive descrimination - business that reject people get less money, fewer reviews, will grow slower, etc. If that business rejects your business someone else will provide it. If nobody serves a community, there’s a business opportunity waiting. Etc.

    I don’t know how delusional you need to be to assume it could EVER be possible that somehow every business would just refuse to serve a population because of X characteristic.

    • ZzyzxRoad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know how delusional you need to be to assume it could EVER be possible that somehow every business would just refuse to serve a population because of X characteristic

      But they just said it: the Jim Crow south. This isn’t some crazy delusional scenario. It’s literally already happened, and it was not even a hundred years ago. When schools were integrated there were mobs of white housewives yelling racial slurs at little children because they were black. This is real shit that’s gone on for more of America’s history than not.

      Don’t skip history class, everybody. But I guess if conservative judges get their way we’ll probably lose that too.

        • Saxoboneless@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Good point, must not have been that bad, supreme court could really bring that one back with zero consequences, huh?

          • Not_Alec_Baldwin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            What? What are you even talking about?

            Nobody wants racial segregation except the ignorant racists, who deserve the economic damage caused by being ignorant racists.

            Forcing an ignorant racist to serve people they hate will accomplish nothing, and certainly won’t help their ignorance or racism.

            Daryl Davis is pretty vocal about the way he deradicalized KKK members, I recommend looking into him. Spoiler: the secret is shared interests (music) and normal conversation, just getting to know each other.