• catty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    I’m finding I’m using youtube less and less that I can’t actually remember the last time I used it for anything. Youtube has so much crap now.

    Because of their monetisation scheme for content creators, it was profitable for creators to drag 15 mins of information out to one hour, and then to include shock faces as thumbs to get more clicks, and then to get more viewers just to watch a bit of the video as viewership dwindles into just mindlessly watching suggestions.

    I feel sorry for those creators who have gone balls deep with youtube content and who have no “plan b”.

  • happydoors@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Yo I pay for premium and it’s been fucking slow. Cancel my subscription? Guess I might need to.

    • scintilla@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I had to turn off privacy badger and ublock for it to not be slow. It’s stupid I’m paying for the service to be ad free it should be ad free without complaints.

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I watched videos on Newgrounds using dial-up

    They are going to have to slow ad blockers by a lot for me to consider it slow

    • mesa@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      9 hours ago

      My wife and I were discussing this. This isnt “slow” to us, its just a tiny bit inconvenient. We were used to the old AOL pictures taking a good minute or two to load.

      We would get rid of Youtube before we get ads.

      • catty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Ahh seeing images load line-by-line and you get excited as you can actually start to tell what the image is!

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Then I suppose it’s a good thing they’re limiting non-premium users from using the “high bitrate” quality options?

    ^ that was sarcasm. HARSH sarcasm. With both middle fingers pointing toward a Google logo and spitting.

    • dil@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      yeah I had some blender visuals I made that only look good high quality because of the detail and it looks sick as my desktop wallpaper with hidamsri but horrible and blurry viewing it on youtube at the highest quality

  • PixelPilgrim@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    fine by me i listen to audio of videos i watch and i dont mind the lower resolution because it means im using less internet

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      That’s true but I wouldn’t really classify this as evil.

      Serving videos isn’t easy or cheap. It’s hard and expensive.

      I obviously use an adblocker everywhere and so should you.

      But saying that Google or anyone else is doing anything wrong by blocking adblockers is ridiculous. When they finally succeed, I will just accept that I finally lost after many many years. My usage of YouTube will likely go down substantially as well. Crying about it after you have used their service for free for YEARS, really makes no sense.

      • stellargmite@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        You’re right, but also They get alot more from the deal than you acknowledge. The service has never been free. They already had a profitable model, and now they want even more. I call it evil, but in a sense it’s standard corporate behaviour.

    • xzot746@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Or “Might as well do EVIL”, what is anybody going to do about it, maybe make some noise but we just pay off TACO and we good.

  • phantomwise@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    That’s a relief. I’ve been dreading the day when they introduce server-side adsm but it seems we’re not there yet 😅 I’m not sure what they think they’ll accomplish with this when it’s A LOT less painful than turning off your adblocker and dealing with the ads, though. Maybe they’re just trying random things to see what works.