Why is the journalistic standard to embed tweets (xeets?) instead of using screenshots?

An embedded tweet can be deleted, and depends on X supporting the functionality. If editing is ever introduced on the platform, it would permanently break all past articles that don’t have an independent record of the tweet (such as a full quote in the article or a screenshot). X can potentially (and maybe does) embed tracking features.

It seems like there are a lot of good reasons not to use embedded tweets, but almost every news source does it this way. Is there a good reason why?

    • Jeena@jemmy.jeena.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      11 months ago

      They don’t care about you but yes they would probably go after a newspaper and sue them for copyright infringement.

      • Steve
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        That suit would be practically impossible, as it’s clearly Fair Use.

        • centof@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Fair use is a defense you have to make in court. And court is expensive.

        • CluckN@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I hate Twitter but I despise articles that just post 3 tweets and provides a barebones AI recap of the conversation.

    • Tvkan@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      If you’re a large online news outlet doing this repeatedly: Probably sue you.