Often, in discussions about old movies, someone will say, “That movie couldn’t be made today.”, and inevitably someone else will disagree.

  • EponymousBosh@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    If you have a Nebula subscription, Lindsay Ellis has a fascinating video about Blazing Saddles and why it really couldn’t be made today, but not for the reasons you’d think; it has more to do with the history of the Western genre and the state of race relations in the US than “political correctness.” I wish she’d put it on Youtube.

    So I guess that’s my roundabout answer: any movie that “couldn’t be made today” is probably because of larger social forces than just “too much swearing/violence/nudity/etc.”

  • m4xie@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    My highschool physics teacher said the Nazis recorded X-ray video of Holocaust victims knees as they walked. Because MRI machines and other medical imagers aren’t large enough to walk around in, the films are still one of the best sources of how the bones actually move naturally under load in situ surrounded by the connective tissue.

    The radiation dose required to expose regular film at 24 frames a second killed the subjects.

    I really hope they don’t ever make movies like that again.

  • m4xie@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    In 2021 my friend’s roommate said you couldn’t make a movie like Borat these days. I immediately pointed out they made a Borat movie the year before.

    I didn’t point this out, but he claimed to be 6’2" while being a few inches shorter than me, and I’m 5’11".

  • hedders@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Cleopatra. There’s no way anyone would release a 4 hour historical drama as a movie. It would be a TV series these days.

  • socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    Famously, you couldn’t make Blazing Saddles today because they already made that move in the 70s

  • GraniteM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    Labyrinth and The Dark Crystal. No way would a studio agree to do that much hand-crafted work. They’d just have the stars reacting to a bunch of tennis balls and “fix it in post.”

    • RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      “Buckman! There was a fingernail in my food, ya fatass moron! Yesterday, it was a Band-Aid!”

      Buckman: “Sorry, sir. The Band-Aid was holding the fingernail on.”

  • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Blazing Saddles.

    Probably the Blue Brothers, but for different reasons. I feel like most of the blues legends are gone.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    Look up all the stunts Buster Keaton did, and shiver. Or The Little Rascals or Hal Roach’s Rascals, whatever they were called.

    Or the 1968 version of Romeo and Juliet - while probably one of the best versions ever, nobody today would dare to think doing a movie like that today - it would be criminal.

    • FatVegan@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      That doesn’t mean they couldn’t do it today, it would just be a weurd cgi mess wuth marvel level cutaways