• Denixen@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    I would answer debian, but I want her to say arch.

    I want my girlfriend to be smarter than me ok!?

      • Digit@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s all it takes to be a distro slut!?

        What the heck am I then?

        %brl list -v
        artix
        bedrock
        ceres -> devuan-ceres
        devuan -> devuan-ceres
        devuan-ceres
        devuan-ceres-new
        devuan-chimaera
        devuan-testing -> devuan-chimaera
        devuan-unstable -> devuan-ceres
        exherbo
        fartix
        fentoo
        fexherbo
        garyos
        gentoo
        gentoostudio
        goblin
        gs -> gentoostudio
        hijacked -> gentoo
        init -> gentoo
        jentoo
        kentoo
        kentwo
        local -> gentoostudio
        marklar
        oasis
        pclinuxos
        space
        suckless
        tentoo
        tudio -> gentoostudio
        ubuntu
        void
        void-kde
        

        And that’s just one of my computers.

        [… it’s starting to make sense, thinking about one thing I made, I called wminizer]

          • Digit@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            What the heck am I then?

            A container slut.

            ???

            But… there are zero containers on any of my systems.

        • Digit@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Actually, looking at that list again, I see I’ve neglected upgrading on that computer for longer than I realised… chimaera as testing? *checks site*, yeah that’s “Chimaera 4.0 has moved to oldoldstable status.”. That’s like 4 versions old. XD

    • DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      This is the way! Everything is based on Arch, Debian or Fedora anyway so you might as well stick to what is well known and supported.

        • DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          well known and supported 🤪

          From my understanding NixOS and Gentoo is “support it yourself”. I haven’t tried either of them so I could be completely wrong about that.

          • TwilightKiddy@scribe.disroot.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            It’s pretty much the same thing as everywhere, you have a bunch of lovely people who package and test things, nothing too weird. What you are describing is LFS.

            • DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              I was under the impression that you had to compile everything yourself on Gentoo and in Nix that you have to mess with a config to do everything and anything.

              Maybe I should try them both to see what the fuzz is about.

              • TwilightKiddy@scribe.disroot.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Speaking about Gentoo, you don’t “have to” compile everything, but let’s just say it’s strongly encouraged. Most of the compilation is automated though, think AUR on steroids. If you don’t want to touch anything, you can go with defaults for all the software and you’ll get basically what you get on any other distro.

                The thing is, though, if you are not being a little funny with your software, why the hell are you running Gentoo? So, it’s entirely optional, but it’s the main reason one would use Gentoo, otherwise you get a stock standard system with stupidly long updates.

                I can’t speak for Nix, though, I haven’t touched it myself, but from what I know from those around me running it, it’s pretty much the same thing, unless you want something cool, you don’t have to suffer.

                • DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Okey thank you so much for the information! I can see the appeal. More freedom and customization. I am all for it.

                  But for my use cases I think Arch is enough. It strikes a nice balance with official packages and the AUR and I love that you get to choose all of the packages you want to have installed.

            • Digit@lemmy.wtf
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              Interesting graphs.

              Alas, the metric’s a mite confounded by the different ways distros split up packages. So it skews e.g. the Debians up, and the voidlinuxen down.

              … I’m guessing that still wouldn’t be enough to put a dent in AUR and nixpkg 's towering package counts though.

            • BladeFederation@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              That is very surprising, last I heard it had to catch up with having popular applications. Is this due to how package dependencies differ on Nix vs what people think of traditionally as packages?

              • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Not really. (When was last time?)

                The reason is more that the config language that you have to learn if you want to use NixOS is the exact same you use to package applications for NixOS.

                So any user is also just a tiny, non-intimidating step away from being a contributor and package maintainer.

                I know for myself, I never packaged for the AUR - just seemed way to intimidating and a lot of new stuff to figure out - but I maintain a bunch of packages and modules in nixpkgs, and they’re all stuff that was “huh, this is cool but not packaged yet; alright, I’ll package it in my private config; oh that was easy, let’s upstream it”.

                • BladeFederation@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Couldn’t even tell you tbh.

                  Well that’s pretty cool. I always liked the idea of being mega reproducible. I might try it on my home server instead of Debian.

    • Bluewing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ubuntu Server LTS on my first-ever server. I’mma green rook at this. I’m amazed at how quickly and easily Casa was to get up and running on an old laptop.

      I still got a long ways to go before I can try Debian for a server.

        • Bluewing@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          While I agree about the annoying Ubuntu parts, Ubuntu Server LTS does seem to ditch those annoying parts also. Besides, I’m running CasaOS over the top. So I haven’t needed to deal with Ubuntu directly after setup. And hopefully, it stays that way until that old laptop dies.

  • Björn@swg-empire.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    She’s just baffled that anyone who knows those two distributions could be so dense as to whittle down the vast infinite sea of possible options to just two incredibly boring ones. She would have cried next if he hadn’t done it.

    Also, OpenSUSE.

    • ☭SaltyIcetea☭@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      well the vast majority of those are just arch and debian with extra steps, with the occasional fedora based or independent distro

    • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yep. Should be “Windows or Linux?”

      I know part of the joke is that it’s not this comparison--that asking “arch or debian” also rules out Windows--but it really is the important dividing line.

      • Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        “Hammer to penis or steak” is less interesting than “Steak or lobster”

        Anyways the answer is Steak, and a different steak if its for a server, and lobster (derogatory) if its for an important server

    • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Im still surprised that opensuse still exists. We had to give it a try for networking classes back in ~2007 and it was very server oriented and totally didnt have a desktop feel.

      • Jiral@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        That was almost 20 years ago. It is nothing like that anymore I would say. Some things are still more complicated to configure but then, other things just work that don’t work for example on my other system that runs pop-os, in general openSUSE is just as easy to install as any user friendly distro. And among the rolling release distros, openSUSE Tumbleweed is probably the most stable of them all.

        opi is a great tool, even when just looking for applications in the regular repository. But then you can also very easily access the open build service with it as well.

      • pmk@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        “Zealot” is relative to where you currently are. Mint -> Debian -> Arch -> FreeBSD -> OpenBSD -> Plan 9 -> TempleOS

          • pmk@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            That’s actually what I’ve seen a lot! After a few years of tinkering with your system, the idea of something stable and polished is very appealing, so you can focus on getting things done.

            • tempest@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              I run Arch on my personal machine and Debian on my server and honestly Debian gives me more issues.

              It doesn’t like zfs and Nvidia drivers are always a fight. Debian is still good though if all you want to run is a web server forever.

  • atk007@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    This hurts because Debian is named after a couple (Debra Lynn and Ian Murdock) who got married and divorced and Ian passed away. Going with Debian is a lifetime of hurt.

    On the other hand Arch girls are described in Rick James’s song “Superfreak”.

    • ajikeshi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      and yet… their names are immortalized… it wouldnt surprise me if debian is still around in 50 years