• Railing5132@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    I wonder if the thinking is that once the proverbial seal on that lid is broken, the next administration would just Uno-reverse it by adding more of its preferred justices?

    And, it’s not like (aside from the first two damn years when it should have been done) they had a trifecta; although you could be assured Manchin or Senema(?) would have fucked them over.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Setting aside the fact that this would require a Senate majority, that’s not even the worst outcome.

      A broader spectrum of conservative judges means they need to triangulate across their generational and niche personal views. There is legit some amount of political space between Gorduch, Roberts, ACB, Judge Likes Beer, Uncle Thomas, and Discount Scalia.

      Adding three more of them to match three more liberal judges means even more dissonance.

      And who knows? Maybe we even start getting judges who didn’t fall directly out of the Harvard pipeline.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think the reason the Democrats haven’t tried to add members is the same reason that they didn’t mean to coin to handle the debt ceiling and they didn’t bother to either use or destroy the filibuster.

      Many entrenched Democrats in Washington are happy to be the second worst party. That’s their identity. And it makes sense if you consider their funding source. Big money comes from big companies, and they give it to people who will represent their interests.