• LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    Single-issue voters are ignorant to begin with, but failing to help stop another Trump presidency isn’t the moral high ground. If you’re in that group there’s no point polishing your halo, because you are shitting on it.

      • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I agree with Michael Moore’s theory that this was why many people voted for Trump in 2016. They felt ignored and powerless, so they said okay here, I’ll vote for this asshole, see how you like that! It was an expensive lesson that I don’t think the Democratic party has really paid attention to. Their response was to rethink their campaign strategies - many of them probably blamed their loss on trying to elect a woman for President - so they regrouped and managed to get Biden elected. But he didn’t put any bold ideas forward. All he really did was be a Democrat in the White House instead of a Republican. I don’t feel like Kamala Harris is playing that game. She really does want to move forward in a big way and not go back.

    • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      71
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      So genocide is a single issue to you, like school vouchers or fema funding? I think that says a lot about you. None of it good.

      edit: and please, downvote away if you dont agree, But notice how close the election is and how many upvotes this viewpoint has. 28 up to 70 down is what I see at this point. If Harris loses it will be because she flatly ignored this ~30% of of Dem voters.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I mean its likely trump will continue the genocide for people who managed to flee to the US by revoking the legal status of refugees given he seems to think the word “palestinian” means “terrorist”

        The cruel calculus is that Netanyahu wants trump to win.

        Do you hold your nose and vote Harris to deny Netanyahu another victory or do you roll over entirely for Netanyahu and let him have an assistant in genocide with Trump? What is the lesser of two evils here?

        Netanyahu, at least, will be thrilled to hear palestinians are not voting for Kamala because of him.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        What part of “Trump is actively sabotaging peace talks” do you not understand?

        Please, refer to this chart -

        • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Many thousands of us dont vote for genociders of any party. “What part of that do you not understand”. Support genocide, then we dont support you, full stop.

          • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            The two party system is a broken system. You do not choose who you support. You vote against who you dislike the most. It’s a shit system, but wasting your vote is more akin to supporting Trump than voting for Harris is to supporting Harris.

            • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              My vote is one of many who think this way. When you stand alone you are unempowered yes, but when you have a lot of people behind you then you’re a movement and you have power. The anti genocide movement has power that Harris needs to win, Our votes are there for the taking, and its up to Harrsi to choose whether she’ll pick AIPAC or us. If she picks AIPAC and the destruction of our republic, then thats on her. IF the continuation of our system of government depends on bribery to do the murder of innocents, then its time to change our system of government.

              • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Our system of government is fundamentally rotten and needs to be changed in general regardless of Harris. Not voting, resulting in putting a fascist in power isn’t how you do that.

                • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Our system of government is fundamentally rotten and needs to be changed

                  Allowing yourself to be steered by maneuvered into giving away your once every 4 years bit of negotiating ability is not the way you do that.

                  • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    If you think your only bit of “negotiating ability” is once every four years, you’re doing it wrong. Not only that, if you think not voting is doing anything to change anything, you’re actually just a straight up moron. Protests, local elections, pressuring representatives. If you actually care and aren’t just virtue signaling, do shit that matters.

          • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Right, but the trolley thing is apt here. There is no option to just stop using the trolley because it’s not safe, it’s a runaway trolley with too much momentum to slow down. All you can really do is decide which track it goes down, and pick the less lethal path.

            • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Harris could steer the trolley so it doesnt hit anyone. She’s not trapped on an out of control trolley car at all-- She is driving the effing thing and has full control.

          • Fedizen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            A vote isn’t an endorsement, you are not personally responsible for the actions of the people you vote for - otherwise trump voters would be in deep shit. Even if you vote for the best politician the world has ever seen that’s still not you doing the politics and you’re not responsible for it. The forces involved are simply larger than a single person.

            A vote is a tool to be deployed tactically. Its powerful enough republicans are looking for ways to prevent you from having it.

            Look at it this way: Netanyahu would prefer Trump win because he might get more support and expand the genocide of palestinians to US soil. A vote for Kamala likely won’t improve Gaza but it will deny Netanyahu things he wants.

            Tactically, there is efficacy in denying the butcher of gaza the things he wants even if it doesn’t go as far as anyone needs it to. Why let Netanyahu win without a fight?

            • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              A vote isn’t an endorsement, you are not personally responsible for the actions of the people you vote for

              I dont agree. When soneone says they will do something terrible and you vote for them anyway, you have enabled it and have some of that outcome on your hands.

              • Fedizen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Then you commit to never voting. If you vote for Bernie people will say “oh he endorsed joe biden, he is complicit” but you don’t get to choose the battlefield only the outcome of the battle.

                Fundamentally a percentage of politicians will lie, or lack resources to fulfil promises. There is simply nobody on earth that can uphold the promise of never doing something terrible, even on accident.

                • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I reject the idea that war crimes are always the only choice we have in any election. But if thats your slant, OK, why not push for a third option-- getting Harris to stop the shipments by applying voter pressure on her. The only time politicians care about what the elctorate thinks at all is right before a close election, like right now. Why are so many dems not pushing her to take a better stand than she has had?

                  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    I actually think stopping shipments is not going to achieve anything. Polling shows its popular (so I disagree that dems aren’t pushing Kamala, Biden, etc) but if Israel just changes arms suppliers its easily undermined. And we don’t even know if like there’s conditions on shipments like “we won’t use nuclear weapons on Gaza if the shipments continue” There’s just too much we don’t know to vote based solely on another country’s actions.

                    I think a better policy is to just take in gazan refugees and make it harder for hardline israelis to visit the US. Do the pullout from vietnam movie script. Of course this is a less popular policy and it is one dems likely aren’t getting pressure to do, even though its low risk and high preservation of human life.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        28
        ·
        2 months ago

        So genocide is a single issue to you, like school vouchers or fema funding?

        Hey now. Vote for Kamala and you can get genocide, school privatization, and more underfunded climate disasters. You don’t have to choose.

        Dems of 2024 have fully ingested the Republican platform of 2004. That’s why the Cheneys are campaigning for the Harris ticket.

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Cheney is campaigning for Harris because Trump is so bad that even the Devil says “Wow, that’s fucked up”

        • Fedizen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          And you are on here doing Netanyahu’s work of trying to get as many palestinians as possible killed by focusing your Ire on what, Kamala Harris? We all know Netanyahu wants trump to win. And we all know how trump sees even domestic US palestinians legally here. He thinks they’re terrorists. Do you think he won’t try to deport them? Or do you agree with Trump on that front?

          Why are you here doing Netanyahu’s work for him? He can come on here himself and bitch about kamala, he doesn’t need you.

          • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            And you are on here doing Netanyahu’s work of trying to get as many palestinians as possible killed

            Ah, yes, what Netanyahu truly wants is for us to, checks notes, be angry about Israeli state terrorism.

            • Fedizen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              He’d prefer leaders publicly support the genocide and would recognize the illegal settlements, offer additional support.

              I also wouldn’t count out the idea trump and netanyahu are undermining peace talks - we have already seen trump push republicans to reject a far right border bill because he thought it would give him advantage and the fact that Reagan did something similar with the Iran hostage crisis.

              The reality is that Netanyahu would prefer Trump over Biden or Kamala, do you deny this?

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            Human Shields rhetoric. You’re blaming the folks in the firing line for the actions of the ones pulling the trigger.

            • Fedizen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              I’m accusing you of doing exactly what Netanyahu would prefer that you do, no more, no less.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              If/when Trump wins and he immediately deports all Palestinians, will you admit you were wrong? Or will you just double down (or are you just full of shit from the get-go)?

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        2 months ago

        So genocide is a single issue to you, like school vouchers or fema funding?

        Hey now. Vote for Kamala and you can get genocide, school privatization, and more underfunded climate disasters. You don’t have to choose.

        Dems of 2024 have fully ingested the Republican platform of 2004. That’s why the Cheneys are campaigning for the Harris ticket.

    • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      64
      ·
      2 months ago

      Single-issue voters are ignorant

      I think killing is wrong. Feel free to call that ignorant.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        63
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Trump told bibi to "hurry up and finish the job. He will kill 10x as many Palestinians and say they deserved it.

        He has also promised to “round up millions of illegals” in the US and put them in camps, itself a genocide. He will undoubtedly kill thousands doing it.

        He also stated that he will use the military to eliminate " the enemy within," who he specially called leftists like yourself. He will kill people in the process.

        Your choice should be pretty clear if you abhor killing.

        • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          44
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Yes, my choice is for a party which doesn’t support killing innocent people. The Dems still have time to campaign on that platform.
          I agree that one party has said that they are even more pro killing innocent people. And I don’t agree with that. That’s because I don’t agree with killing innocent people at all.

          There is no level of killing innocent people that I’m okay with.

          • smeenz@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            36
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Then you’re making an emotional decision based on refusing to accept anything less than perfect, and since perfection is not an option in this election, and because not voting is essentially a vote that trump doesn’t have to counter, abstaining voters are proportionally more helpful to trump than they are to Harris.

            • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              24
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Then you’re making an emotional decision based on refusing to accept anything less than perfect

              You can continue making practical decisions based on accepting killing innocent people. I’ll be over here waiting for people like you to notice what you’re doing. Maybe when you are one of the innocent people being killed you will decide it’s not acceptable?

              • smeenz@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                26
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                2 months ago

                You need to realise that the world is not black and white - it exists in shades of grey where nobody gets everything they want, and have to accept compromise for the greater good. You seem to be stuck in a mental state where you can’t bring yourself to vote for a party that isn’t offering a perfect world to you, and you must get past that and look at the bigger picture, and the impact of disgruntled blue voters staying home in protest. If trump wins, your protest will have contributed to that win, and you’ll have to live with that.

                • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Samvega isn’t even American. Don’t bother trying to talk with them about this.

                • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  25
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  If trump wins, your protest will have contributed to that win, and you’ll have to live with that.

                  No, I promise you, I won’t. Me living with being in a world where killing innocent people is politically acceptable is far more harmful than the guilt I will feel on Trump winning. This is because my protest is not contributing anything to that win whatsoever. You might as well ask me to feel unhappy that the moon has craters when I - as far as I can tell - am not a large mass hurtling through space that has hit the moon.

                  If Trump wins, then that will simply show that enough Americans want to hurt innocent people. As is shown by America being a country which finds itself unable to strongly counter IDF terrorism visited upon Palestinians.

                  I will be sad, but I won’t be completely surprised.

                  I say it again: my protest will have no effect on Trump winning.
                  My protest will also have no effect on innocent lives being taken. This is because we live in a morally grey world, where people can rationalise harming innocent people as an acceptable byproduct of doing business. After all, the price of compromise for me getting a better candidate is allowing brown strangers to die. Doesn’t that sound great? I deserve more than them. I’m not brown, after all! It’s their fault for being born where they are.
                  And, finally, my protest will have no effect on Trump winning.

                  • smeenz@lemmy.nz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    19
                    arrow-down
                    7
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    You’re quite mistaken about that. You will be responsible for trump if you had the option to vote against him and chose not to do so.

                  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    8
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    You can tell yourself that but it doesn’t change the reality that you will have directly contributed to Trump’s victory, and the elimination of the Palestinian people (and as anyone who knows anything about WW2 will tell you: genocides can get worse).

          • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            30
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            2 months ago

            What about all the innocent women who are dying in our country because of who trump appointed to the supreme court and the result was the overturning roe vs wade?

            Do those lives matter at all to you? Women bleeding to death in their cars because hospitals refuse to treat a miscarriage.

            What about the kids who get massacred in school shootings because Trump and people like him won’t support increased gun control legislation?

            What about all the innocent people of color who have been killed by police? Do they matter to you?

            If trump gets into the office not only will the Palestinian people be far worse off, so will every group I mentioned above and more.

            You said you are against killing innocent people, then why dont you care about the women, children, and people of color who are getting killed in our country needlessly?

            There’s far more destruction for far more people if trump gets into office. If you want to double down, go for it, because I think it’s worth reminding people just how much death in our country can attributed to Trump. Every woman who dies from preventable pregnancy complications. Trump directly contributed to that.

            • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              What about all the innocent women who are dying in our country because of who trump appointed to the supreme court and the result was the overturning roe vs wade?

              See state ballot initiatives. they’ve been far more effective in 4 years than democratic presidents and congress critters have in 5 decades.

              What about the kids who get massacred in school shootings because Trump and people like him won’t support increased gun control legislation?

              see above.

              What about all the innocent people of color who have been killed by police? Do they matter to you?

              see above. biden and harris support the police remember? they actively fought against police reforms.

              If trump gets into the office not only will the Palestinian people be far worse off, so will every group I mentioned above and more.

              yes that is unfortunately true, maybe you should inform harris to change her position on genocide to ensure the other groups are not put at risk over her hubris? On the flip side its a lot easier to protect the groups you’re white knighting for in your local community via your local reps and processes and your own personal actions.

              Maybe you should realize you can in many states safely vote third party for president and democrats down ballot and essentially have the same national outcome while simultaneously undercutting the genocide harris is dead set on committing. thereby giving left wing congress critters more leverage with harris post election.

              What you are really telling everyone here is that you are unwilling to give up a bit of your privileged lifestyle over a little bit of genocide. That says more about you than it does about the individuals withholding their support from harris.

              • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                state ballot initiatives

                LOL, way to immediately tell everyone that you have no fucking clue how this country works.

                • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  oh dear am I embarrassed!

                  • legalizing weed -> state ballots.
                  • min wage increases -> state ballots.
                  • legalizing mushrooms -> state ballots.
                  • health care improvements -> state ballots.
                  • abortion -> state ballots.
                  • LGBT+ rights -> state ballots.

                  seeing a pattern here?

            • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              23
              ·
              2 months ago

              If trump gets into the office not only will the Palestinian people be far worse off, so will every group I mentioned above and more.

              There is no level of killing innocent people that I’m okay with.
              I’ll support a political party which does not want to make people worse off because of their identity.

              • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                25
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                The problem, as I see it, is that there is literally no chance for a third party to win the presidency.

                Which means that I have three options:

                • Vote Trump. Someone who has called for more violence.
                • Vote Harris. Whether I’m happy with her or the Democratic party or not. Try and mitigate as much killing and harm as I am able to. Actively try to prevent things from getting worse.
                • Vote third party/Don’t vote. Either Trump or Harris will win, and I can claim my conscious is clear. If Trump wins, I will have not done what little I could have to lessen the evil. I have to be okay with someone who is far worse getting into power

                We can’t solve the genocide by voting third party. All we can do, all that the little power granted to us can do, is try and prevent it from getting worse. So if you want to prevent as much killing as you actually can, if you want to give the most people the opportunity to live, then morally as I see it, you need to vote Harris.

                Is she perfect? No. Hell no, man. But she is the candidate that with this genocide happening, and it is happening regardless of who is getting in, who will give the most Palestinians a chance to live. A third party candidate isn’t making it to the White house so a third party candidate can NOT lessen the harm.

                • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  19
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  Which means that I have three options

                  I do not have three options, myself.

                  It is said that Americans have three options, the best of which only might improve the situation where one country is terrorising another country by killing innocent people, every day.

                  • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    16
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Which means that I have three options

                    I do not have three options, myself.

                    It is said that Americans have three options, the best of which only might improve the situation where one country is terrorising another country by killing innocent people, every day.

                    So are you American? It sounds like you aren’t and, if not, why are you advocating for people not to vote or vote third party?

            • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              24
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I don’t like killing innocent people. Which is something Trump will do, so I don’t like him.

              I checked your post history, I don’t care much for you, either.

              • YeetPics@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                Oh wow, the perpetually-online militant fuckwit read my comments, that’s just terrifying!

                Anyways.

          • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            K while everyone else at the adult table discusses things you can play with your imaginary options.

            Every country kills innocent people. It happens.

              • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Thanks. As I said to the commenter above. We are sitting at the adult table. Come join us once you realize everyone has blood on their hands and the world isn’t black and white.

                  • blackbelt352@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Genocide is not a necessity, but it is an ongoing reality. The only feasible choices we as americans have at the present moment is Trump the genocide accelerationist, and Harris the genocide status quo and even reduction, ideally continuing the slow rolling supplies policy Biden has adopted and furthering that policy to slow the movement of weapons into israel. At the end of the day Netanyahu is the one actively waging genocide, and getting funding and weaponry from a wide number of countries. I would much prefer is we completely stopped sending weapons to Israel, but unfortunately thata not how internationally binding treaties work.

              • YeetPics@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Where is yours?

                Oh, you aren’t sorry about the war crimes your government has accomplished?

                Typical.

            • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              18
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Every country kills innocent people. It happens.

              Thanks for admitting this.

              imaginary options.

              Not respecting a human world which purposefully kills the innocent is not ‘imaginary’.

              • bob_lemon@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                22
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                2 months ago

                Not even trying to minimize the amount of killing in the human world because it won’t reach 0 seems like you don’t actually care about human life at all.

                • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  16
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  That’s interesting. I have to support a party which supports killing innocent people to be against killing innocent people.

                  Wow, humans sure are good at rationalising things in a nonsensical way. No wonder they’ve made such a fucked up world.

                  • bob_lemon@feddit.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    14
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    That’s not what I’m saying. You can absolutely continue to condemn and fight the democratic party on any topic you deem worthwhile.

                    But putting that tiny mark on the ballot paper might ever so slightly get the world moving closer to the ideal you imagine, instead of veering away from it.

                    That is the rationale I’m using here.

                  • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Voting doesn’t mean you support them.

                    You aren’t giving them money, you aren’t campaigning for them. You are saying that between these two, admittedly fucked up, parties this is the one you think that will be better.

                    So for the presidential election, vote to reduce harm - not to increase it.

                    If you want to do better, support, fund, campaign for third parties down line. Local elections and build the momentum until they become a viable presidential candidate. Work to reform the electoral system that can dismantle the two party system.

                    But don’t think voting for Harris is de facto supporting the Democratic party.

      • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Thinking killing is wrong is not ignorant. Deliberately ignoring the point is ignorant. If Harris loses Trump wins, and if Trump wins things will be a lot worse for Palestine. Refusing to help because you’re standing on an imaginary moral high ground is both wrong AND ignorant, because you’re clearly smart enough to look beyond your own righteousness. You have no excuse.

        • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Refusing to help because you’re standing on an imaginary moral high ground

          How do you want me to help?

              • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Then we hold our politicians accountable? Because we still can? Because we still have a functioning Republic, and not a fucking Autocracy?

              • Fedizen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                You’ve done the dark calculus and made a strategic vote, its doesn’t mean you endorse everything Kamala does.

                The reality is Kamala will likely be more amenable to pressure here than the Trump. At worst you’ve protected the small number of palestinian refugees to the US from further persecution. At best you create a lasting problem for Netanyahu by electing people who aren’t cheerleading the genocide.