• Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 hours ago

    This is why you lay the groundwork for cheap, renewable energy networks for consumers and industries to have access to before holding up a poster announcing seemingly random extreme tariff amounts.

    Oh, and the chaotic on/off and exempt/non-exempt uncertainty is almost certainly part of the reason as well. And that’s assuming the next administration doesn’t reverse or drastically alter this terrible trade policy…

  • KbSez@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Saved you a click:

    The primary barrier remains the lack of access to competitively priced, long-term power, according to the industry.

    “Energy costs are a significant factor in the overall production cost of a smelter,” said Ami Shivkar, principal analyst of aluminum markets at analytics firm Wood Mackenzie. “High energy costs plague the US aluminium industry, forcing cutbacks and closures.”

    “Canadian, Norwegian, and Middle Eastern aluminium smelters typically secure long-term energy contracts or operate captive power generation facilities. US smelter capacity, however, largely relies on short-term power contracts, placing it at a disadvantage,” Shivkar added, noting that energy costs for U.S. aluminum smelters were about $550 per tonne compared to $290 per tonne for Canadian smelters.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      That Canadian and Norwegian aluminum is probably significantly greener than American aluminum too because they have so much hydropower.