I guess my question is who gave the Americans the right? I say this as an American. But would not the world be a better place if we just minded our own business and quit nation building and stoking non existant fires?

  • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Anybody who thinks about that question enough always realizes they don’t want that kind of power and control. Sometimes people think about it partly, get excited by the promises of power, but only misrepresented by their own misunderstandings, and mistakenly think they do.

    Nobody actually does, just not everybody realizes it fully.

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Because people in power only want one thing - more power. They only fear one thing - loosing power.

  • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Pretty much when the US was the only super power to survive WWII unscathed.

    Also, having developed atomic hellfire, and the will to use it (twice), kinda makes you the big kid on the playground.

    • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      18 hours ago

      This right here. The US was isolationist prior to WWII but then got attacked and drawn in to active war.

      Since the mainland of US was untouched by war directly, and industry boomed post depression and during the war they came out of it better off than Europe, which had a lot of rebuilding to do.

      As a result of the war and the need for defense they established bases all across the globe and for the last 80-90 years as the political system grew more corrupt the increase of American hegemony followed.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Canada’s role is adequately acknowledged, our Nederland brothers send flowers every year

        The US taking credit at all in Europe is silly but they did help with the Japanese theatre

  • sircac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Every empire has those aspirations.

    There are many ways to achieve it through the complex relationships between countries and societies (e.g. soft power, cultural influence, militar control, etc) but an empire willing to try it at any cost with any means will always succeed for longer as an empire…

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    The citizens, in general, don’t. We want to do the same thing every other country’s people want - live our lives and hopefully give our kids a good or better one.

    I have no fucking clue what the government is doing to make these decisions.

    • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      The last time Finland invaded a nation, they did it together with the Nazis. I don’t think you want Finland to rule the world.

      • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        It was either surrender to Soviet Union (legendary dicks) or ally with Nazis (had no reason to stay and conquer us). We picked the lesser evil.

          • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            23 hours ago

            If the lesser evil would’ve been Soviet Union, we would’ve been a) communists and b) not independent anymore.

            • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              22 hours ago

              You famously lost the war, and you’re still an independent nation. Finland obtained independence in 1917 because of the communists, namely the Bolshevik constitution, allowing for the first time in human history the right of self-determination and secession. If it hadn’t been for the communist you’d be a province of Russia.

              • lime!@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                19 hours ago

                a large part of finland is a province of russia. Karelia belongs the the finns.

                • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  Have you asked Karelians what they think of that? Or are you arguing purely from nationalist beliefs?

      • daggermoon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Okay but in a hypothetical scenario where Finland ruled the world (as it exists today), I highly, highly doubt they would be siding with fascists. I don’t see your point. Thanks for leading me to some Wikipedia articles to read though.

        • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          Finland currently doesn’t recognise Palestine as a country, they’re currently, as it exists today, siding with the genocidal maniacs in the Israeli government.

          • daggermoon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            That is unfortunate. However, I don’t see why you’re so insistent. You appear to be taking my original comment more seriously than I did. Sorry I didn’t do research on Finland’s position on Palestine or of their involvement in World War II. It was not relevant at the time. I just happen to appreciate Finnish art and culture.

            Edit: Sadly, my country doesn’t recognize Palestine either. There isn’t a whole hell of a lot anyone here (excluding our corrupt leaders obviously) can do about it.

  • Steve
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    After world war two, Europe was busy putting itself back together. It left an opening that the US stepped into. And who wouldn’t like to be the big dog in the yard.

    • palordrolap@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      2 days ago

      Pretty much this. Up to that point, it was Britain and a few other European nations that were doing all the management* in various places in the world. After WWII, they realised: “You know what, we’re tired and worn out and everyone wants us out anyway. We’re going low energy to rebuild at home. Someone else can step in if they want.”

      * a.k.a. “Colonialism”. Management is an odd choice of synonym I grant you, but once you’ve got a colony, it’s in your interests to run things in good order. Until the locals rightfully kick you out, that is.

      • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        After WWII, they realised: “You know what, we’re tired and worn out and everyone wants us out anyway

        This is a very naive understanding of the history of decolonisation. Decolonisation wasn’t a western initiative, it was done because the colonies were literally rebelling against their European oppressors, great part of that through Soviet funding and arming.

        Someone else can step in if they want.

        …unless they oppose western control of the region like Patrice Lumumba, Fidel Castro or Mosaddeq.

        • Apepollo11@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          This is also an oversimplification.

          Colonies were always rebelling. The main issue that led to decolonisation was that there was no longer the resources required to maintain these big empires.

          Coal was more expensive, troops were more expensive, everything now cost too much to maintain.

          It’s the end phase of every empire.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      They (the USA) got to be the big dog, protecting us in europe, and we let them the hard & soft power. Everyone was happy (in the US and Europe) until americans started to believe their own hype that thay are in fact better than other people, and thus the breakup began.

      It’s not over just yet with the usa supremacy but trump fucked things up so bad that IMO ten years from now the world will be a different place.

      • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        protecting us in europe

        Protecting Europe from what exactly? What military threat did the US fight against in Europe? There hasn’t been an attack to western Europe since WW2 until the US bombing of Yugoslavia.

        • Valmond@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          You can’t be this dense right?

          Against the URSS 🙄

          Edit: BTW URSS = USSR = CCCP before any homeschooled troll tries to be smart.

              • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                20 hours ago

                What on Earth are you talking about? My country, Spain, only received weapons and military aid against fascism from the USSR years before WW2 started, during the Spanish civil war. The Soviet Union was the most antifascist state in Europe, and I wish my country would have been next to the Soviets so that we wouldn’t have endured almost 40 years of fascist regime.

                • Valmond@lemmy.world
                  cake
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  20 hours ago

                  Sure, just forget about Lithuania, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Estonia, and so on and on and on.

                  The soviet union teamed up with the nazis and started the second world war, check out the molotov ribentrop act.

                  Also: why chose between two bad things, Franco and the USSR when you can aim for the free world? Are you unhappy i the EU?

              • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                20 hours ago

                The USSR that saved Eastern Europe from the almost complete genocide of Slav “untermenschen” according to Nazi genocidal plans such as Generalplan Ost, at the tremendous cost of 27 million deaths of Soviet citizens in the brave struggle against Nazis.

                • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  19 hours ago

                  And it did so by means of rape and genocide. Our Soviet aligned government took 2 years to get rid of an epidemic of syphilis after they were through.

                  It was just another conquering imperialistic power

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    After WW2 the US became addicted to being the world police and many other countries were happy to have the US cover the cost of their defense or income from hosting US bases. Selling arms is also big business and the DOD justifies it by saying that it keeps personnel and manufacturing lines for weapons running.

  • MNByChoice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    The USA was securing international trade lines. After WW2, they started doing it to counter communism and build friendships. (Cannot attack your trading partners.)

    This was not entirely popular with Americans, see “Team America: World Police”.

    Another country or coalition could step up. Just build a navy that rivals the USA one to secure shipping lanes.

  • the_abecedarian@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    There are privileges to being an empire and the capitalists in the US continue to use that empire to get access to those privileges. Favorable trade, commercial, and financing terms are a big one.

    Also the US war industry pushes the country to intervene. You can see how there are interventionist and isolationist movements in the US fighting right now over how much the US gets directly involved in Iran-Israel.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    America was the standard for a Democratic Republic after WW2.

    after the war we helped most of Europe return to normal and even improved quality of life and living standards. part of that help came with stipulations on how the US had control within those countries that had help.

    Had the US not stepped in at the time to stabilize Europe, another war would have likely happened and another, and another.

    My guess, most of Europe would have fallen under Russian rule, or at the very least heavily influenced by, if the US didn’t step up.

    I suppose European’s don’t look at how bad the war left Europe and often just want to forget the atrocities, but that’s not an excuse for blaming the hand that helped you in your time of need.

    • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      The US didn’t step in with the Marshall plan to stabilize Europe against war, the US did so in order to prevent socialist uprisings all over Western Europe, and to create ties between European capital and US capital so that Western Europe would support the US in its imperialism.

    • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      People turned to Russia specifically because they disapproved US imperialism and wanted to counter its power, while avoiding being doomed by capitalism. I’m not saying this was the ideal solution, but at least if they succeeded we wouldn’t be in the position we are today

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        US imperialism didn’t happen until the 1950s, well after the war.

        this was, in part, due to the private investments from large American companies at the time. in-fact, the American economy was booming for three reasons

        1. war was over and people were desperate to find stability and peace
        2. Americans at home got through the war mostly unscathed and now had an abundance of work which in-turn made an abundance of money to spend
        3. Europe desperately needed materials and products to rebuild their own economy, this only further boosted American GDP from a previously untouched market. private investment took place from American companies within Europe to increase profits further.

        in a sense, because Europe was so weak after the war it only fed US corporate imperialism. Had Europe been able to stand on its own the United States might not have had such an industrial boon and similarities between Europe and the US might have not been so significant.

        one might even draw the strong correlation between American corporate interests and total subservience of government alliances at that time. our government had, up until then, mostly stayed neutral to concerns between corporations and citizens. this changed though because of the newly created military industrial complex that was created to feed the war. afterwards you had defense contractors that saw dollar signs, and the tradition still goes to this day.

        speculation on my part, the political climate of the current day is the fruit bore from that union of corporate and state all those years ago and this has been the agenda of the American elite all along and they are currently in the final seconds of the “game of thrones”.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    We were unspoiled by WW2. This gave us an unnatural ability to pull ahead economically while other nations rebuilt. We taught our citizens that this was deserved and the propaganda has stood until pretty recently. This unfair advantage is slowly then quickly unwinding.

    • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      “America is the best! Nobody could match our manufacturing!”

      Well no, you were just the only hevay industrial country that wasn’t bombed in the 40s. America didn’t rocket ahead through the 60s, they just helped kneecap the competition.

      And for the god damn 10th time, Mexico and China didn’t take the manufacturing. They didn’t raid the US and deport Ford to them. Ford walked it all over very politely.

      • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        US manufacturing was dominant through the thirties and forties. It really shone in the 40s under a war time economy. It was a sleeping giant and the world knew it. Pennsylvania outputted more steel than Japan and Germany combined. Audacious goals set by President Roosevelt were mocked by Hitler as audacious Hollywood goals. The US easily surpassed these goals.

        It was an amazing display of competence. The only other countries to match the intensity of growth would the USSR during the five year plan and the PRC during the eighties. But both of them were starting from an agricultural economy. The USSR never reached the American manufacturing peak and China has surpassed.

        The unprecendent dominance is due in no small part because the rivals needed to rebuild. But under representing America’s position with regards to labor, capital, resources and state coordinated mobilization would be a serious error.

  • Petersson@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    It’s not about USA, it’s about (powerful) countries in general. China, USA, more restricted also Russia, Iran, … If someone has power (or wants to have it looks on North Korea) they also want to keep it.