Overall, Millennials didn’t change how they lived to account for things like climate change. They didn’t stand together as a society and reduce waste.

First, when has ANY age group coordinated across every nationality around the globe to “stand together”? Add to that, the age at which you’re suggesting this should have occurred is right when they were reaching adulthood and barely grasping how the adult world works themselves. At the same time they were coming of age during back to back global financial crises with and even book-ended by one of the most deadly pandemics in human history, while also having the fewest resources to affect change. “Standing together as a society” is unrealistic at any age, much less the one they were given.

Second, I’d argue at the individual level they made some of the largest shifts to low and lower carbon options than any other group. One example would be Veganism which would address the 17% of climate change gases from livestock. Many of them embraced bicycles instead of cars and small EVs such as scooters.

I’m not a Millennial or a vegan nor do I own a small EV scooter, but looking at all the generations alive today, I’d argue Millennials have done the most to combat climate change in spite of the other generations alive working against their efforts.

Millennials have done a great job raising Generation A and the Zoomers… the kids today by and large are way more aware and woke

And those companies have spent a ton of time and effort discouraging and preventing people from collectivizing via union busting. There’s a huge power asymmetry at play here, an individual should not be held to the same standard of accountability as the people who literally control the economy through non-democratic or straight up unelected positions of leadership (board of investors or private CEOs respectively). They can, at any moment, choose to reduce their profit margin for the betterment of the planet - but they don’t, because as a small group of owners, they exist to profit so they would never agree to do so in a meaningful way*. And because they’re collectivised and we’re not (just look at the swathe of antitrust cases where businesses that are supposed to compete, have instead chosen to act like a cartel), they hold almost all the power. Let’s focus our attention away from blaming the average person, and onto the real root cause so that we can actually collectivise against that root cause rather than fight amongst each other.

*: without the state straight up socialising their risk, for example the green tech grants and loans we have been and are giving out, all over the world. Something Elon Musk is very familiar with, given that Tesla might not have existed today without the generous $465 million government loan they got in 2009.

“Opting out” doesn’t mean you “opt in” to whatever forced you to “opt out” to begin with.

If I give you a choice between being punched in the face or getting kicked in the crotch, it’s not moral acquiescence to either regardless which you choose.

Your argument rests on a fallacy- “vote with your wallet”. This presumes that we don’t vote with our voice anymore, so it supersedes a democratic system of governance.

Consider: “if you oppose slavery, just don’t buy slaves, and we’ll let the market sort out who’s right and wrong”

Sent from graphene but sure

Guns or GMEs. Get your gold my man.

They are, but they think they’re fighting it.

We gonna ignore definitional disputes.