• themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    447
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t feel bad for the guy, but I don’t celebrate this sort of vigilante justice, either. Prisoners should be safe from other prisoners. Prison is not meant to be torture, and recidivism is a massive problem in the United States. Chauvin will have 20 years to contemplate his crimes, and treating him and every other prisoner will only reinforce their criminal proclivities.

    • PunnyName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      241
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      American prisons ARE meant for torture. Don’t get it twisted.

      If they were for rehabilitation or treatment, then we would see to that, societally. But we don’t.

      This is a small piece of why our justice system is so absolutely fucked.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        111
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        American prisons ARE meant for torture. Don’t get it twisted.

        naw. not really. Prisons are meant to provide cheap domestic labor to the corporations running them. it’s all profits.

        • Poggervania@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          48
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Never forget, it’s actually legal to enslave prisoners according to the 13th Amendment.

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            36
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            yup. And there is a reason why laws are written to disproportionately affect certain groups- like how crack cocaine gets more jail time than powder, or marijuana convictions…

            • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Loopholes are things intentionally built into structures with the purpose of allowing something through. I find it weird so many people think loopholes aren’t something intentional.

              • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I’m having a lot of trouble finding a source that backs up this position. Everything I’m reading says that loopholes are typically oversights, not intentional inclusions.

                That being said, the 13th amendment’s allowance for prisoner slavery is not a loophole at all, it’s an explicit allowance. Loopholes are not explicit, that’s kinda the whole point of them. It’s a bit like saying that the standard deduction on your taxes is a loophole. It’s just an explicitly defined feature.

                • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  While that, in fact, does happen, when a large portion of loopholes benefit corporations are written by people employed, or otherwise invested in, those corporations you would have to be lying to yourself, or ignorant of the situation, to believe loopholes are generally unintended.

                  https://publicintegrity.org/politics/state-politics/copy-paste-legislate/you-elected-them-to-write-new-laws-theyre-letting-corporations-do-it-instead/

                  The above is one example of how this is done. Bills are written to model what the industry wants to get out of legislation. Then they use LLMs to construct legislation after being trained on those models. They then collude to push these bills to as many places as possible, greasing palms the whole way. Sometimes these are just out-right legislation for the purposes of enriching the industry, more often though they are bills written with carefully designed language to allow for specific technicalities, or for stipulations of compliance to be so vague as to be unenforceable, or to use a bunch of jargon and complex linguistics to make a law read one way to the laymen, but another to the professionals that will actually be interacting with these laws.

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          FWIW the vast majority of prisons in the US are not corporate run (>90%), but those majority government-run prisons still provide a lot of free/cheap manufacturing labor to private companies.

          The government itself is to blame, not just private prisons.

        • commanderbalok@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Spoke with an AIC “worker” this summer about the slave labor he was doing, he said it was better than being inside. Not at all defending the program but it was interesting to hear his perspective. Also don’t mean to sound glib, phone typing isn’t my favorite.

      • affiliate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        i think you’re responding to a normative statement by making a descriptive statement.

        for those unaware, here’s a quick explanation from wikipedia: a normative statement is “meant to talk about the world as it should be”, while a descriptive statement is “meant to describe the world as it is”.

          • affiliate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            i wasn’t trying to talk about grammar at all, i was only trying to focus only on the meaning of what was said. but i probably could’ve made my point more clearly, so ill try to do that now.

            here’s an “example”: one person says “things should be done this way” and the other person says “well things aren’t being done that way”. these two statements aren’t in opposition to each other. in fact, it’s perfectly possible both people agree with each other. maybe things aren’t being done a certain way, and they should be done differently.

            the terms “normative” and “descriptive” might seem overly complicated to someone who hasn’t seen them before (they did the first time i saw them), but i thought i’d use them because they’re useful concepts to keep in mind. they’ve helped me communicate and resolve conflicts in my own life. i’ve been both people in the example above, and it’s helpful to be able to know when it’s happening.

          • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The most based discourse nazi, singlehandedly preventing what could become a 30 comment deep argument where both sides fully misunderstand the other

          • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Edit I’m fuckin stupid, leaving this comment up as a monument to my illiteracy

            Making a comment like this about basic conversation and debate concepts is like driving and saying you can’t read the speed limit signs. Like, maybe you should avoid actively participating altogether until you’re actually able to

            • GBU_28@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Huh? My point was many Lemmy users very commonly reply to someone’s descriptive comment with a normative complaint, and freak out when it’s clarified.

    • Veedem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Very glad this is currently the top comment. I was worried I’d run into a comment thread cheering for violence that simply shouldn’t have happened.

      • Orbituary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The idea of “not killing” and “I wish he was dead” can’t seem live in most people’s head. I think he’s human waste, he should be dead, and I wouldn’t have lamented his death. BUT!!! I don’t want him to die and I don’t want someone to kill him.

    • nicetriangle@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah dude is a piece of shit, but it’s a bit disheartening seeing people cheer on stuff like this.

    • seathru@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      but I don’t celebrate this sort of vigilante justice, either

      We don’t know what happened. He might have ran his mouth and found out he wasn’t a protected class anymore.

        • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It does a little bit, I think.

          Yes, our prisons should be safe for those who are confined within them. I agree with that, and that less people should be confined in the first place.

          But there is a qualitative difference between “he was stabbed due to being a cop (or due to being THAT cop)” vs “He got into an altercation that resulted in him being stabbed, but which could have happened to anyone.”

          I think the kneejerk assumption is that he was targeted, which is worse IMO.

          Not that I shed a single tear for the fate of Derek Chauvin, mind you.

        • Fades@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Doesn’t that prove his fuckin point? Even in something as locked down and controlled as fucking prison can’t stop humans if they truly want to harm others

          • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You think prisons are locked down and controlled? Prisons are for-profit labor generators where slaves are treated like, well, slaves. Society accepts this because we act like they deserve subhuman treatment. We should not accept this.

          • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            to be fair, the united states doesnt care about the humans it pretends to ‘rehabilitate’. we dont care about recidivism, because our system is for punishment not for rehab.

            other countries do a better job at fixing their humans than we do. can we start there?

          • Decoy321@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I was just making the joke initially, a contrasting oversimplification.

            But just because they don’t stop all violence, it doesn’t mean they don’t stop any violence. Prisons literally do keep murderers locked up instead of out harming others in the public. Are they flawless systems? Fuck no. There’s all kinds of shit wrong with the systems. But they definitely beat the alternative of having no prisons.

        • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          And you should look into improvised weapons they confiscate from prisoners.

          • remotelove@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            Human creativity gets maxed out when you literally have nothing to do but sit in a cell all day for years. Just because someone is a criminal doesn’t mean they are completely stupid.

            I have often wondered how many actual geniuses have been chewed up by the worlds prison systems. If only some of those people had gotten a fair chance in their life to have their skills developed in a healthy environment… It’s depressing to think about, actually.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    149
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe Chauvin stabbed himself in a state of “excited delirium.”

    The important thing is, the inmate investigated himself and decided that he did nothing wrong.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    143
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m sorely tempted to start circulating claims about what Chauvin had in his system at the time.

    EDIT - Also, this shit:

    Chauvin’s stabbing comes as the federal Bureau of Prisons has faced increased scrutiny in recent years following wealthy financier Jeffrey Epstein’s jail suicide in 2019. It’s another example of the agency’s inability to keep even its highest profile prisoners safe after Nassar’s stabbing and “Unabomber” Ted Kaczynski’s suicide at a federal medical center in June.

    Oh it’s a problem all of a sudden. Can’t imagine why.

  • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    142
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Murderer. The proper way to refer to him, mainstream news, is “the murderer Derek Chauvin”. He was convicted of murdering George Floyd.

    • ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yep he is a murdering murderer who committed murderous murder against a murderless murderee who was murdered by said murder.

      Fyi did you know murderee was a word? I just learned this.

    • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Then should we call his victim “the drug dealer/abuser George Floyd”.

  • bricklove@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel this whole case is everything wrong with the justice system (aside from him actually facing consequences). A corrupt cop with a history of violence gets attacked in an overpopulated and understaffed prison where folks are punished instead of rehabilitated.

    • BetaBlake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right, none of these things should have happened at all. It’s just a negative feedback loop of incompetence and corruption.

      • Wrench@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 year ago

        This person spent a career throwing people into this exact system. Eagerly, if my perception of his past behavior after watching his entire trial is at all representative.

        • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah I think people are forgetting this was a cop who actively perpetuated this system. And not even in a “just following orders” sense, he seemed to delight in it.

    • randoot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Prisons sure cost a lot of money to tax payers. Are you sure they’re understaffed or is the staff just apathetic

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes to both. Keep in mind “understaffed” means lots of things to lots of people.

        That prisons aren’t basically forced schools and therapy is an atrocity, to me, as an example. It changes the entire concept of what prison is about in ways I find unacceptable

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I know a prison guard, not very well but yes we have talked a few times. He was telling me how there is basically no system in place for therapy for them. They see something brutal and they are expected to just come into work the next day which causes PTSD to run rampant.

        Messed up.

      • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m of the opinion that, while the premise is agreeable it simply isn’t possible to rehabilitate police officers.

      • NightAuthor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        If someone can be rehabilitated, I believe that implies that they can be unhabilitated. It kinda implies that people aren’t inherently bad / don’t do bad things without something causing them to. If your dog shits inside because you forgot to take it out, do you punish it? If so, congratulations on being consistent, -ly an asshole.

  • ???@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    While it’s easy to not sympathize with a person like that, no inmates should be getting stabbed in prison. It’s still wrong. And still a symptom of the bad justice system in the US.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Guy committed slow murder and set my country on fire. I don’t even know how we would be able to quantify the damage he did. There were BLM protests in countries on different continents. There is now less trust of the police globally, there are were countless riots and deaths and assaults and fires, this mistrust set off cycles of violence and has set race relations back decades. We live in the world now that we rightfully can’t trust our own LEOs and they have hunkered down.

      There are zero winners here. We all benefit from a police system that works and has earned the public trust. So yes I will shed zero tears for this man. Because fuck his racist asshole

      • Clbull@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        We had BLM protests here in Britain too, but George Floyd isn’t the main reason we’ve grown to distrust cops.

        Two years ago, a serving Metropolitan police officer ‘arrested’ a young woman who was walking home from her friend’s house on the basis of her breaching COVID lockdown guidelines. He then raped and murdered her. The Metropolitan Police then proceeded to brutally crack down upon a peaceful vigil held to mourn her.

        Wayne Couzens is thankfully serving life without parole for his sickening crime, and the ladies who were manhandled, tackled down and detained during the vigil have been compensated by the courts. This whole scandal because the catalyst that led to Cressida Dick resigning as the Met Police Commissioner (long overdue), and investigations that found institutionalized racism and misogyny in the Met.

        Another example is the ‘Kill the Bill’ protests, which were protests held against the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill which was going through Parliament, which essentially wanted to give the police greater powers to suppress peaceful protests and dish out ten year prison sentences for causing a public nuisance. This came off the back of environmental groups blocking roads to protest the government’s inaction on climate change.

        Protests to oppose the bill led to a riot in Bristol where a police station was vandalized, and a later protest which was cracked down upon with violence. I remember seeing a clip on Twitter of a police officer bashing a woman in the face with his riot shield.

      • ???@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, this one guy here got a nice twist of karma. Many others though just get stabbed and raped anyway.

        • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maybe we should fix both problems, and having a cop get shanked in the shower or whatever could provide some impetus toward that.

    • Radioactive Radio@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And cops who are supposed to protect people shouldn’t be executing people, but here we are. He himself contributed to the problem he’s facing.

  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The only thing that stops a bad guy with a sharpened melted toothbrush, is a good guy with a sharpened melted toothbrush.

  • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Of course this would happen, but yeah, he shouldn’t have been stabbed in prison. I hope that’s obvious to everyone.

      • ExLisper@linux.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        53
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        But if people don’t suffer in prison how will you make them afraid of committing crimes? /s

        • interceder270@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah… because nobody avoided committing a crime because they were afraid of going to prison. /s

            • interceder270@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              1 year ago

              People avoid committing crimes because they are afraid of going to prison.

              Lol. Crazy how these things need to be spelled out for you, but I guess that’s where we are now 🤷

              • ExLisper@linux.community
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                People avoid committing crimes because of their education and morals. If the only thing stopping you from murdering someone is fear of prison you’re a psychopath. Most people are not like you and they don’t want others to suffer. Most criminals commit crimes because of lack of education and opportunities. They don’t care about going to prison because they have nothing outside of it they will lose like a good job or house. Europeans know that and focus on reeducation i.e. giving opportunities to people that commit crimes so that they don’t do it again. Americans also know that isolating criminals from society is not punishment enough so they try to add as much suffering to it as possible. When people suffer in prisons they feel justice was truly served. It’s just one of many examples of how primitive American society is.

                • interceder270@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Okay you got me!

                  People don’t avoid committing crimes because they’re afraid of going to prison. I was so wrong. Thank you for enlightening me.

                  We should never punish criminals. We should only ‘rehabilitate’ them in the most comfortable manner possible. Everyone can be ‘rehabilitated’ and nobody I mean nobody is going to take advantage of lax punishments to commit more crimes!

                  You’re so wise and definitely not being taken advantage of.

                  If the only thing stopping you from murdering someone is fear of prison you’re a psychopath.

                  What about robbery? Lol.

                • Lupus108@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Don’t argue with edgy teenagers, see his last reply, he is either 12 years old or functionally an idiot, Not worth the time nor energy.

              • hansl@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s called Rational Choice Theory and it’s been disproven a bunch already. People dont think about consequences (generally) before committing a crime.

    • PowerGloveSoBad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah it’s one of those weird situational things. He definitely deserves to be in prison, and hard to argue against the stabbability, but when you do one at the same time as the other it seems wrong somehow

      • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Sentence is supposed to be the thing that judge throws at you, and that should be it. The story doesn’t tell whether he was stabbed just for being who he is or whether he pissed somebody off. But it’s easy to imagine it’s the former in this case.

    • Squirrel@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Should it have happened? No. Two wrongs don’t make a right, and all that. Prison shouldn’t be dangerous for inmates, no matter what they’ve done.

      Am I upset to hear that the personification of “ACAB” got stabbed in prison? Also no.

  • athos77@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    In November 2022, an inmate at the facility’s low-security prison camp pulled out a gun and attempted to shoot a visitor in the head. The weapon, which the inmate shouldn’t have had …

    Well, that seems a bit obvious.