this shuts down rumors that bethesda will move to unreal engine for ES6

  • cmhe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    That isn’t really saying that much. It could still be a creation engine that has a UE5 renderer on top. Like the Oblivion remaster.

  • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Ok and does it run optimized on old hardware and Linux? I’ll easily skip it if it doesn’t. 😜

  • TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Loading screen after loading screen after loading screen, but hey you can put a cheese wheel in funny places.

  • Maldreamer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    This is actually a good news and I am glad creation Engine will be used, The best part of Bethesda games are the modability creation engine and its predecessor provide. Unreal engine is not moddable and is not even beginner friendly, while someone like me can fire up Geck or creation kit and do a full fledged quest mod.

    • who@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      I guess you’ve never had to reconcile the disaster that ensues when multiple CE mods update different parts of a game’s .esp data.

      If they touch properties that happen to be near each other, the mods that try to preserve properties that don’t concern them end up stomping all over one other, leaving the player in a horribly broken land of conflicts and sadness. The mods can’t help it, because the engine’s modding system and data structures are fundamentally too coarse to allow touching only what’s needed, and too stupid to make reliable conflict resolution possible. The endless quest to work around this flaw is why Skyrim has uncountable patch mods, which shouldn’t be necessary in the first place. It’s a bloody awful design.

      I get that you love the possibilities afforded by modding. We all do. But please don’t glorify Creation Engine in this area. What’s under the covers is embarrassing, and particularly bad when more than a few mods are used at the same time. Players and modders deserve something better, and a competent engine developer absolutely could deliver it.

      As someone who has spent too many hours dealing with its fallout, I wish Creation Engine would die.

      • baatliwala@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I mean, it’s a new version, you’d hope they’d fix at least some issues - me, massively coping

        • The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          It’s mostly a tooling issue, so they really could, but I still doubt it.

          I remember installing conflicting mods with Fallout 3, and you just had to run a tool to examine the mods and merge the changes together (and warn you if they genuinely conflicted). It was like a 1 click process and I’m amazed it hasn’t been moved into the engine itself.

  • zecg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Translation: it’s the same shitty gamebryo they’re always using.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        2015? that codebase started in morrowind. and say what you want about that game but it is not a looker. it launched the same year as metroid prime.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 hours ago

          And Unreal Engine started on 1995. This argument always shows people’s ignorance of software development. When the first pieces of the engine were built is not why it’s shitty. It’s because they haven’t invested money into it where it matters. (Unreal Engine also has some serious issues. It just looks prettier.)

            • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              They rebuild the engine to be 64-bit (instead of 32-bit) for Fallout 4, and that version is what Skyrim Special Edition is running on

              • lime!@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 hour ago

                that’s not a complete rewrite. hell, depending on how it was architected it may just be a recompile

            • Benchamoneh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Very probably yes, but it will also have an extensive feature set and stable, mature functions that work well after 20+ years of development.

              A mature codebase is often a double edged sword I agree. But it’s not always a good idea to just throw away all that progress.

              • herrvogel@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                They don’t work well anymore though, that’s the whole point. Bethesda’s codebase is past “mature”, it’s just straight up old and outdated now. Has been for a decade at the very least. Their games have looked and performed noticeably worse than their contemporaries for a good while now.

              • lime!@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 hours ago

                in bethesdas case though?

                a similar thing happened with arma reforger a few years ago, it was supposed to be a tech demonstrator for a new engine but it turned out to still be the same codebase as operation flashpoint from 1995. the engine is solid but it’s super annoying to program for, they have this custom scripting language that’s completely batshit insane because everything is infix by default, and an ui toolkit that is written as c++ classes meaning the actual game has a compiler in it for a subset of c++. so the scripts can be edited at runtime but if there is an error in the ui the game crashes at startup. people were hoping they’d finally switch to something that made sense but no.

        • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          ·
          23 hours ago

          I didn’t think Skyrim was too outclassed compared to its peers in 2011, given that it was so much larger and doing so much more than a lot of them under the hood. But Fallout 4 came out alongside The Witcher 3, and the difference between the two was night and day. Then of course Baldur’s Gate 3 next to Starfield, and I have to scratch my head wondering what the hell Bethesda is doing still running this tech stack.

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            It’s not entirely out of question that they’ll use Unreal for graphics while retaining Gamebryo for gameplay. That’s kinda how the Oblivion remaster works. And might be best of both worlds if they manage to make Unreal not suck in terms of performance and don’t fall for the photorealism trap

            • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              I think graphics are pretty low on my list of priorities for how those games need to modernize. Starfield looks pretty alright in sheer fidelity, but the faces don’t animate well, the conversation system is dated even compared to The Outer Worlds doing basically the same thing, and the engine seems (for some reason) incapable of putting together a proper cut-scene.

              • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                17 hours ago

                Ah to be fair I haven’t played Starfield or even watched too many videos. I also didn’t like FO4 much so I was pretty much running with the assumption that they hadn’t changed much since 2011

                Still, they may not need as many engine programmers if they reduce what their in-house engine needs to do. Could free up finances to hire more people to work on the meat and bones of the game. Or they could just pocket the difference and not give a fuck about making a good game, that seems quite likely too.

        • mcforest@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Morrowind? Gamebryo is the continuation of the NetImmerse engine. Development started in 1997 with the first game released in 1999.

          • lime!@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            20 hours ago

            yeah it’s not bethesda’s engine. but my point was about where the codebase for the creation engine comes from, and that’s the morrowind code.

  • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    15 hours ago

    If they go for a small-ish hand-crafted world, this is probably the best tool for the job. I don’t really care for loading screens when I enter/exit buildings…, I care for a compelling narrative within an amazing world, something I haven’t seen since Morrowind.

    Also please revamp your animation system

    • aksdb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      We are not talking about a scenario where they only had 2 years to pump out new content so they had to work with what they had. That they didn’t manage to build a new tech stack in the absurd amount of time since Skyrim is just embarrassing.

      • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        That they didn’t manage to build a new tech stack in the absurd amount of time since Skyrim is just embarrassing.

        1: They were making games in that time, just not Elder Scrolls

        2: Completely switching engines would make all the tools the modding community has built over the years useless, potentially killing that community for the new games

        3: Every other game engine is also just as old as Creation Engine if you only look at when the code was first made, like you’re doing right now

  • commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I’m sure they’re well aware that the biggest knock on Starfield are its forgettable plot and universe and too much loading screens. It’ll be less of a problem in an Elder Scrolls game as it’s building on a great lore foundation and it’s a region rather than a bunch of planets. I’m sure in the 7+ years later I expect to actually play the game, loading screens won’t be much of a problem. Improved graphics will be a given. It won’t set the world on fire but it’ll look firmly like it belongs in the PS5 generation which is good enough for me

  • paultimate14@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    21 hours ago

    This may be unpopular, but I think this is great news.

    Skyrim became one of the best-sellign games of all time in part BECAUSE of how great it is to see your character get ragdolled into the lithosphere by a giant, or to watch the chaos of spawning thousands of wheels of cheese on top of the throat of the world and watching them roll down.

    An Elder Scrolls game that was built around having realistic physics, or being restricted to more cinematic movement and knteractions, would lose a key essence of what made the earlier games great.

    I don’t want engaging combat in Elder Scrolls. If I want combat that I have to pay attention to, I’ll go play a Souls game or a fighting game or one of the thousands of games that have tried to be “Skyrim with better combat” that have languished in obscurity because they miss the point.

    • dovahking@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Also the reason skyrim is still popular is because their engine is way easier to mod compared to unreal. I don’t even know any unreal game that has even 10% of modding capability of creation engine. Granted it’s outdated, but it’s still the reason their games are popular. Hell even starfield recently got a star wars overhaul mod which wouldn’t be feasible with unreal. As much as people like to shit on fallout 4, it’s modding scene is still one of the most active one. And starfield’s failure was more because of scale of the world (and poor writing which has been a staple since skyrim). I’m still skeptical but also somewhat hopeful as long as they build upon the previous es formula.

    • galaxy_nova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      That’s fair, I’m someone who didn’t particularly like Skyrim and am hoping for better writing and better combat because I liked the overall idea of Skyrim but honestly I’m assuming it’ll be more to what you’re hoping for especially if Starfield is anything to go off of. Man was that game disappointing.