• jtrek@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Ok clearly it’s not literally about making CDs and people saying “just make your own streaming service” are both missing the point and vastly over estimating the capacity of the average person.

    The important part that’s largely missing from today’s music environment is the personal touch and investment. Many people, as the author says, just comfortably coast through an algorithmic smoothie of familiar music. That is inferior to a friend saying “I made you this mix” and then you actually listen to it, attentively, more than once.

    It doesn’t have to be a CD. It can be a zip file. But the intention and focus was important.

    I’m an outlier in that I never let “the algorithm” choose what plays. Sometimes I still make mixes for friends, though lately they’ve just been a collection of links. That process of choosing is meaningful. My friend still listens to the mix I made for them when their job laid them off, sometimes.

  • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    No, we need transferable digital licenses. I want to both own my software and download it on the go

  • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Only if burned from FLAC or similar. But also no. 700MB and super slow. Take an old Android phone with an SD card in it and turn it into a WiFi server. Let people connect to it and take what they want. iPhone, Android, Windows, macOS, doesn’t matter, it’ll connect to it.

  • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Nothing’s stopping you from burning a CD right now. But ultimately, these kinds of nostalgic memories are less about the tech itself and more about remembering the happy times of youth. Bringing back the burned CD won’t bring those back I’m afraid.

    • Signtist@bookwyr.me
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I’ve recently gotten into vinyl, and what I’ve learned is that convenience is often antithetical to experience. When just about every song ever made is immediately available to me at a moment’s notice, I stop caring; I’ll listen to a song I like for a little while then move onto the next one without thinking about it, and I won’t form any lasting memories along the way. When music is something that takes time and effort to enjoy, I have a chance to form a memory about my enjoyment, and when I have to physically find a song in order to listen to it, it gives that song much more meaning than if I spent less than 5 seconds typing the name in on Spotify.

      • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Environmentally awful though.

        Ingredients are terrible and they are bulky and heavy to transport.

        Makes more sense to have your own server and make a sleeve or carboard qr code that “plays” your selection to give you the best of both worlds.

    • homes@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      What’s stopping me is that I haven’t had a CD burner in like 12 or 15 years. But you’re right about the rest of it.

    • PetteriPano@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Actually…

      I got married seven years ago. We could bring our own music to the ceremony, but it had to be on audio CD.

      None of our modern computers have any optical drive, but we have an USB DVD burner. We just couldn’t get any modern system to complete a burn, it just kept failing halfway through.

      After many hours I installed OS X on my MorphOS PowerBook G4 from 2005 to use the built-in drive and burn through iTunes.

      It used to be a cakewalk. Now not so much.

      • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        24 hours ago

        You probably had a faulty DVD burner then. I did it within the last year, using my modern computer and a cheap external drive.

        • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Or just burned too quickly on poor quality media. It seems like as dvd drives got better the media got worse. But 15 years ago they stopped getting better, and the media kept getting worse.

    • blackbeans@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I agree with your point. However that’s not what the article is about. It’s about the social and aesthetically engaging aspects that come with physical media compared to the utilitarian services where music is presented like “tap water”, and the sense of indifference that’s created through abundance, hurting the artists financially.

    • cenzorrll@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, I miss the days of making my own mixes, sharing music with friends, etc.

      I recently ripped a bunch of CDs and one of the batches was my folio in my car. I do not fucking miss having to handle CDs. The slightest scratch on the foil and it’s done, scratches on the plastic and it’s done. You had a hour and some minutes max that you could pack into one is you didn’t have an mp3 capable player.

      I love getting music on CDs, I love listening to an album straight through and the hidden song at the end coming after a bunch of silence, and making a mix that flows like a God. But it’s so much nicer having all of my music ripped on my server.

  • filk_nl_Max@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    21 hours ago

    There was a certain intentionality to burning a CD that a Spotify link just can’t replicate. Spending an hour picking the perfect songs to fit exactly 80 minutes, and then handwriting the tracklist… it was a real labor of love. It’s a shame that convenience has replaced that personal touch.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      19 hours ago

      A Certificate of Deposit. A kind of simple interest bank account adjacent in form factor to bonds. In simple terms, you give the bank an amount of money for a set amount of time, say a year, during which you can’t withdraw the money without paying a penalty. When the term is finished the bank returns the money plus an amount of simple interest. They often bear higher interest rates than savings or money market accounts and are FDIC insured.

    • normalentrance@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      You can get one at a bank. It is short for certificate of deposit. It’s basically a high interest savings account that is difficult to access until it matures. They are at or above 4% now at some banks, so it is a relatively safe investment that is slightly higher than inflation.

    • rozodru@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      imho in a weird way cassettes were better/more fun. Like wanting to record a song you like so you’d sit in front of the tape deck for hours on end listening to the radio waiting for that ONE song to come on so you could record it. It would take you hours, maybe even days, to make that mixtape of songs you didn’t own.

      Also when I was a kid I had one of those fisher price tape decks that had the microphone attached to it. I wanted to make a mix tape of all my favourite songs from my NES games or games that I would rent (like the Battletoads theme song, or the music from the Batman videogame) so I would pop the game in then hold the microphone up to the TV speaker and record the songs.

    • deranger@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Cassettes are making a comeback much like vinyl but to a lesser extent. I’ve got 600 or so cassettes and probably 3/4 of them were made in the past 8 years.

      • MichaelScotch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Vinyl made sense because of its high fidelity. Cassettes do not make sense unless you enjoy dogshit audio quality

        • deranger@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Incorrect. I have three NAD 6300s and a Nakamichi Dragon, and with metal tapes it’s transparent to digital. Shit even good type II nearly transparent. Tapes do not sound “dogshit”. Unlike vinyl, you can easily experiment with the many varieties of tape out there and master your own cassette recordings. It’s like rolling tubes in an analog amplifier. Yes, it’s not perfectly transparent to digital on a cheap type I tape, but the warmth of a high end type I rounds off some of the harshness of modern tracks. YMMV, it’s not for everyone, but I think it’s pretty fucking cool.

          • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            19 hours ago

            This is a rare setup. Kind of vintage audio unicorn.

            You still have a noticeable noise floor and medium limitations as equalizer, though (“warmer”).

            99.999% of decks and surviving tapes do sound like dogshit.

          • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            I mean reel tape kills vinyl and cassette. It surpasses or equals digital in high $$ situations.

            *its mostly about the mastering

            Yes, its clunky huge and expensive and has a limited catalog. But once you’ve heard one you’ll want more.

              • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                I love showing it to people who havent heard great audio.

                But yeah, its so expensive. The best part tho is unlike records, tapes are very robust if you keep them in normal temperatures and away from magnets. No surface noise, and most tapes the hiss is hardly noticeable especially on anything 15 IPS.

                The good part about the limited catalog is you’re going to always get super high quality from it because its so limited and expensive to do

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    It seems to me like the world has had 3 phases:

    • Phase 1: People own media on records, tapes, etc. because that’s the only way to listen to what you want whenever you want. The only alternative is radio, where you listen to what the DJ thinks you should hear. If you buy something once, you can listen to it whenever you want forever. (Or at least as long as the medium holds up)
    • Phase 2: It was relatively easy to get the media you wanted on demand, but it wasn’t always legal, because the copyright cartels were used to a certain way of doing business and didn’t like disruption. During this phase people still bought read-only media in stores. But, they also sometimes bought blank media and filled it up from their computers at home.
    • Phase 3: Everything is now online, and you no longer own media. In this phase you can listen to / watch whatever you want, but you don’t get to own anything, and you have to pay monthly if you don’t want your media viewing / listening to be interrupted by ads. In this phase, media you love can just disappear if someone loses the license to stream it, or the copyright owner decides to pull it or modify it. In this version someone like George Lucas can decide that the version of Star Wars you grew up on should change, and you now have to accept his new version.

    Unfortunately, long-term storage hasn’t kept pace with short-term storage and bandwidth. You can make someone a “mix tape” that’s a USB stick, but if someone puts it on a shelf it might not be readable in 5 years. You could save the original version of Star Wars to a NAS. But, if your friend wants to borrow it, it’s not as easy as grabbing a case off the bookshelf and handing it over.

    I keep hoping that one of these “crystal storage” mechanisms takes off. Then we can much more easily be data hoarders, keeping everything, and not relying on a continued subscription to a streaming service for our favourite media.