Millennials, Gen X and Gen Z say the system needs reform, an exclusive Newsweek poll found, amid fears the benefits won’t exist when they come to retire

Younger generations in the U.S., including millennials and Gen Zers, are much more likely to believe that the Social Security system needs reforming than those in their 60s and 70s, according to a recent survey conducted by Redfield & Wilton Strategies on behalf of Newsweek.

Some 40 percent of respondents said they believe that the Social Security program currently pays out more to retirees than it is receiving in Social Security tax payments, while 26 percent disagreed with this statement.

Gen Zers (ages 18-26), millennials (ages 27-42) and Gen Xers (ages 43-58) were more likely than boomers (59 and older) to think that Social Security should be reformed.

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    215
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    This is a propaganda article. It’s meant to start the idea that social security change should happen; Social Security had a surplus and was on track to support Gen Z with boomer level benefits until George W Bush drained the fund to pay for the Iraq war. A 100 billion+ surplus (which would have been 2T by 2011) was sucked dry at a billion dollars a day for a war that brought nothing but misery. This current crisis is brought to you by the Republicans.

    Social Security is currently facing an uncertain future as it is expected to face a 23 percent across-the-board benefit cut in 2033, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, unless something changes until then.

    Some bullshit conservative think tank is trying to spin up the idea of cutting benefits to prevent taxing billionaires. Don’t let the rich lie anymore. Make the rich pay!

    • eek2121@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      10 months ago

      Social Security should be reformed. The surplus should be given back and laws passed that forbid touching it. Further:

      • The amount paid out should be significantly increased (after decades of working I would make less than $3,000/mo on SSDI, for example, which isn’t enough for me to live on my own even)
      • There should be no income cap for taxation purposes
      • The retirement age should be lowered to 60 and taxes/formulas modified accordingly.
      • It should not take years for anyone to make it through applying for disability.

      Honestly, Social Security should also be responsible for paid sick/family leave, short term and long term temp/perm disability, unemployment, etc. We in the US could have it so much better…

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah and it should be allowed to hold companies that are bailed out as long as its financial advisers choose.

        Hell when it’s time for UBI this is the administration to do it

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Yeah it’s not enough to live on. I want to be able to survive on social security when I’m old, so I’ll fight for old people to be able to survive on it now. And a little something for a surplus.

      Taxes aren’t why you’re poor, shit pay is

      Also social security for all is UBI, we can demand that

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          And yet

          • social security has enough support that politicians are afraid to touch it, even to fix it
          • even the doom date we’re all worried about, means it can still pay 80%, assuming no fixes
          • if we get past the next two decades, demographics once again favors the current approach

          Fixing it should we quite doable, if politicians look ahead. However the longer we wait, the bigger impact from adjustments, and we all know the reality of politics.

          If you’re under 40, I agree that you need to focus on retirement savings, since that’s the only part you can control

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          That is by no means guaranteed. That is Republican propaganda. If you let them get their way, that is what will guarantee it.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Okay, well then I guess we should just give up on social security since a Republican might get into office one day. Probably should forget about every single other progressive idea too. Because Republicans exist. In fact, let’s just all vote for them and get it over with!

    • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      George W Bush drained the fund to pay for the Iraq war

      Not really. Bush ended Clinton’s budget surplus and replaced it with a budget deficit, and I won’t argue if you hold the wars responsible.

      But SS is not part of the normal budget. It was running a surplus in the Bush years. There was a debate over what to do with the surplus.

      Keeping it “stuffed in a mattress” would be irresponsible for the same reason most of us don’t keep our life savings in a checking account. Bush wanted to invest it in the stock market, but the public rightly thought that was too risky. So it was invested in the most risk-free asset: Treasury bonds.

      That means that the government could spend the surplus, but they are required to pay it back with interest. Failing to pay back SS would trigger a default, no different than crashing through the debt ceiling.

    • Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Damn, good to know I was fucked before I was even able to vote. And here I thought me and my generation were the problem…

  • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Millennials and Gen-Z need to be fucking pissed about any one spouting the bs talking point that social security will just dry up by the time we retire so it’s best not to count on it. Social Security is something we’ve all paid in to, so it better fucking be there when we retire. That’s the deal. I realize there is a funding shortfall, but the fix is damn easy and simply involves removing the exemption the rich currently have.

  • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    10 months ago

    Some 40 percent of respondents said they believe that the Social Security program currently pays out more to retirees than it is receiving in Social Security tax payments, while 26 percent disagreed with this statement.

    And who’s right? Do your fucking job, Newsweek!

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The media doesn’t care about right and wrong anymore. Right and wrong doesn’t sell soap as well as giving you something you can agree with or disagree with to fit a certain ideology to keep your eyes glued to their channel or website.

  • Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yes it should be reformed in the way that the rich should be properly taxed and loopholes like bullshit charities shut down and forced to pay a living wage . I don’t think this is generational so much as classism and late stage capitalism. Im done caring about this stupid generational war between genz at boomers. I’m all about seeing Musk/bezos/Zuckerberg/Chesky cry rather than Mable who worked and paid taxes as a nurse all her life and just needs to retire. Let her. Move on. Let’s stop waxing on about how the boomers had a money fall way back in the 80s cuz it’s no longer the same damage at fucking over the system as these current generations that sucked up the Silicon Valley straw. They are still here. They are still doing the most damage in current day that is directly influencing the lives of the new generations with wage stealing and denying affordable let alone available housing would have direct impact on their social security.

  • Illuminostro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    No, its billionaires who absolutely hate paying any amount of taxes. But they have no problem bribing anyone to get their way.

    We need guillotines.

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        Wait for the United Auto Workers to line up all their contracts so they end at the same time. Sympathy strikes are illegal in the US because they’re too powerful. They’re legal in Nordic countries like Sweden and currently being used to wipe the floor with the richest man on Earth.

        Hopefully this loophole will stay legal. But the great thing is, it doesn’t matter if it’s legal if enough people take part. No industry can just fire everyone at once.

          • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Lol. You’re trying too hard to be a badass.

            No one gets arrested for “striking”. You can’t be forced to go to work. An “illegal strike” just means that you aren’t protected by labor laws and can be fired for it. Normal strike actions are protected by labor laws and you can’t be fired for that reason.

            I suggest you stop trying to be tough and learn more about what you can do legally. Organizing a union is a lot harder and more useful than just randomly being arrested.

  • nbafantest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    One easy way to make social security fund on better footing is to allow more immigrants into this country who will be paying SS taxes.

    • shastaxc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      If you change nothing else you will still run out of money in the fund if the population ever starts to stagmate or decline again. It is basically a pyramid scheme. Importing more people is only a short term fix.

        • shastaxc@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          You’re right, but for this to work you have to increase immigration numbers year after year to keep up.

      • Custoslibera@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Run out of money?

        You can just make more money, seriously.

        All countries can just go into a bigger and bigger debt. It doesn’t matter, money is made up.

        • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Money isn’t “made up”. It’s valuable because a government will only accept it to pay taxes. You can’t pay taxes with anything else. Businesses keep local currency and accept payment in it (but not foreign currency) for this reason.

          There’s no reason to run up debt when corporate or income taxes can be raised. The US has some of the lowest taxes in the developed world. Increasing them is only a political problem, not a financial one. This may become more obvious when the Social Security trust fund gets lower in a few decades.

          • dezmd@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Money is made up, Government is made up, Religion is made up, its all made up, lets not get lost in our own hubris of humanity on this.

            We as human beings happen to have the intellectual evolution to make up all of these variously complex systems of organization. The scientific method itself is such an improvement on our made up bullshit because it created a system to test the viability of the ideas for systems we make up. Your perspective mandates all suspension of disbelief to accept it at face value without any room for nuance.

            At the end of the day, a phrase itself which is just the made up concept to describe the period of our planets revolution in which light from our star is no longer visible from our line of sight perspective, stacking economics and government spending on top of imaginary debt has an instinctual feeling of wrongness even before trying to systemize that feeling into our made up definitions of ethical/morality/legal systems.

            Welcome to humanity, where everything is made up and the points dont matter unless you perceive them in a way that matters. I swear I’m not high right now.

          • Custoslibera@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            No doubt you can increase taxes, sure.

            You can just print more money though and give it out as social security.

  • M500@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    So the generations that have heard all their life that their will not be any social security for them when they get old think it should change and the people currently getting it do not think it should change?

    • nomous@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Par for the course, who even wants to exist anyway?

      I agree with what others have said though, ultimately there’s no war but class war, the haves and the have nots.

    • flathead@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      it says here.

      it says here

      that the unions will never learn

      it says here

      that the economy is on the upturn

      and it says here

      we should be proud that we are free

      and that our free press reflects our democracy

      • Billy Bragg (a boomer)
    • Deceptichum@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Our generation is going to have less children, so who’s going to pay into it when you’re too old to work?

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Same as before.

        GDP can continue to increase even if the population decreases, as long as increased productivity makes up for the difference.

        But if GDP falls, then we can choose between slightly lower SS payouts or slightly higher payroll taxes. Either way it’s not the end of SS.

  • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Tl;Dr: 26% of the respondents simply don’t know what they’re talking about.

    Honestly I’m surprised it’s that low

  • leaskovski@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    This same shit gets pulled in the UK… people complain that the state pension won’t exist when they retire. Thats just bullshit, with no evidence that something like that will happen, because it would never gets passed in the commons.

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    10 months ago

    Oh, it will probably exist, but it will exist on newly created dollars, and therefore, cause massive inflation, and the dollars will buy less and less as time goes on. The dollar is headed for a death spiral like Argentina.

    • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Not going to happen. The fed raised interest rates faster than most other currencies to curb inflation. The economy was running hot after the cash injection it took because of Covid. The dollar isn’t perfect but it is the worlds predominant currency for a number of reasons but predominantly it’s because it is the least terrible of all other choices.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        But that’s the problem. Inflation is still running higher than it should be. And the Fed is already talking about cutting rates which will drive inflation up again. If you take a look at gold and silver from the beginning of 2023 until the end of 2023, you will notice a roughly 10% rise in both on average. Bringing that down would take more time of high rates which we will not get.

        • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          The Fed is trying to get ahead of the next crisis. As aggressively as they raised rates they are also backing off that rise.

          There are a lot of indicators that show high deflationary pressure in residential and commercial real estate, automotive and other manufacturing sectors. Commercial real estate alone has the potential to torpedo some major banks in a way that would make the tech sector banking crash look like a small speed bump.

          The Fed is probably going to keep rates where they are through most of 2024 unless those indicators get worse.

          There are no other major economies that are going to be able pick up the slack if the US dips into a recession. Congress is such a mess that it can’t be relied upon to fix itself. Rates is one of the major tools the Fed has to stop the next crisis and they won’t use it unless they have to.

          • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Yeah, commercial real estate could be a serious issue for the banks. A small amount of deflation is not a bad thing, although large amounts in a very short time definitely is. From what I am hearing, people expect the Fed to begin cutting rates as early as March or April, which definitely is not most of 2024. If the cuts are slower than what the raises were, we might be alright. But something makes me doubt that, because the Fed very much seems to lurch from one crisis to the next. Seems more like an out-of-control train than a well-controlled system.

            Edit: Not to mention that other central banks are buying of gold because of the US threatening to send Russia’s dollars to Ukraine. And therefore showing that dollars as reserves are not meant to be trusted and can be removed on a whim if it suits the US’s political agenda.