• Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      unlike most conventional film projectors, the film runs horizontally so that the image width can be greater than the width of the film stock.

      Nolan could have filmed in any ratio he wanted. Choosing 4:3 is not a technical constraint. He basically chose the opposite of cinemascope.

      • OtakuAllTheWay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        It’s the IMAX aspect ratio 1.43:1 to be precise. He just wants to fill the entire screen for the immersion. They still frame the shot as if it’s a 1.85:1 or 2.39:1, for non IMAX theaters, but in IMAX it just doesn’t show black bars on the top and bottom and you get more information and your entire peripheral vision is filled. Most of the on screen action still happens within that framing in the center.

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    Reminder that he didn’t give a fuck about controlling outbreaks of pre vaccine COVID and that he wanted to force people to see Tenet in cinemas.

    You know, jam hundreds of people into a closed room for two and a half hours so that you can have super spreader events multiple times a day.

    I watched that shit on my phone while sick in bed. Thank you for reminding me that all his films deserve the same treatment.

      • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Following a negotiation between Nolan and Warner Bros. executives, the studio arranged for the film to be released in seventy countries, with a run time of 150 minutes, on August 26,[105][106][107] following preview screenings in Australia and South Korea on August 22 and 23.[108][109] The film opened in select cities in the United States on September 3, gradually expanding in the ensuing weeks.[105] On September 4, it was released in China.[110] The lack of available movies afforded it more screens per multiplex than would otherwise have been possible.[111]

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenet#Theatrical

        them dates are before the vaccine became available. He drove a bargin as hard as he could, to get as many people to see the film as he could.

        Yeah, he’s not a politican, but neither was Typhoid Mary.

        • BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          I mean, fair, but he’s not “head of multiple mega corporations with massive political sway” wealthy, he’s just “very successful film director for many years” wealthy.

          Looking it up, he’s worth $250 million, or about 1/3200 the worth of Elon Musk.

          • zarathustrad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            He still controlled (heavily influenced) how the film was released. That sort of influence in your own industry is control.

            It not only affected the safety of everyone employed own chain (eg. theater workers), is put public safety at risk. The attitude of “well it was not illegal, so it’s governments fault, not his.” Is part of the problem.

  • Hobo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    7 days ago

    Watching the Odyssey on the smallest TV you could find on the set Backrooms is really the only way to truly see the film exactly how Nolan originally intended. Unfortunately many of us will have to settle for the profoundly worse experience of going to our local theater or streaming it in our living room.

  • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 days ago

    My nephew only watches movies in a small window on his laptop. I said “wow, you’re a real cinephile, huh?”. He replied with “yeah if that’s a portmanteau of cinema and defile.”

  • potoooooooo 🥔@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I’ve been working my way through it via YouTube Shorts. It honestly doesn’t feel as epic as everyone says, to me.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I think I’ve watched the entire thing once, but it was a struggle to get through it. So boring.

      I think these movies are hyped by the media and people are just following what’s popular. But yeah, I have seen many who say this movie is the best they have ever seen. I’m actually shocked by that, but sure. They also liked Oppenheimer which I still haven’t been able to get through.

      And they also liked Gravity, which was absolutely ridiculous. George Clooney was a clown in that one.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Different strokes for different folks. I actually liked Oppenheimer and have watched it once or twice at home after seeing the Barbenheimer double feature in the cinema. At the same time, I could see how you might find it boring. I just really like slow burn movies and shows

    • Hiro8811@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      It doesn’t stand up to other Nolan films and the casting is shit, my opinion is to watch Project Hail Mary if you haven’t and rewatch if you did saw it

      • TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’m in a similar boat in I don’t think it was Nolan’s best work (at least, not my favorite of his works), but I don’t see where you’re coming from about the casting. Care to elaborate?

        • 666dollarfootlong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          The extreme ends of the casting are “too many black people” and “too many white people” so I guess it boils down to not enough Greek people

          • TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            I know you’re not making those arguments, you’re just relaying what you’ve seen elsewhere, but I sure do hate to see them being made because they’re always in bad faith. On the one hand, they claim to want ‘historical accuracy’ as if the movie was trying to be a documentary or something, while simultaneously ignoring the historical fact that different peoples have been moving around and intermingling with other peoples since the dawn of civilization. They want to have their (racist) cake and eat it too all under the disguise of “just trying to be accurate”. Also, let’s be real here, as much as celebrity culture can be (and is) a problem in some cases, they are all professional actors, this is their job and most of them are pretty good at it. And if Nolan was forced to cast only native Greek people, not only would that create its own discrimination, but far fewer people would see the movie because there simply aren’t as many familiar faces. Sorry for the rant, I know you personally weren’t making any of those points, I just needed to vent

  • MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 days ago

    I heard the saying “Watching Interstellar on an Apple Watch”. I almost want to get an Apple watch JUST to try it

    • cannedtuna@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 days ago

      2.5” cones in that tv make it sound amazing. Like listening to it through a tin can I imagine