• Ravenheart@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, radical left is more like: Seize the means of production! Abolish capitalism! Abolish patriarchy! Abolish the state!

      What’s labelled as radical left in the OP is just bare minimum, common sense policies that any marginally sane person should want.

      • mika_mika@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        the radical left boogieman in my current rural small town actually wants all gender neutral bathrooms in schools, with kitty litter boxes in a stall for otherkin. And they will force you to use your own neopronouns, or they will cancel you, and will make you lose your job.

        that’s what these people around here really believe the average neolib democrat wants for society.

      • raze2012@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Probably because “radial left” has no real leg to stand on right now and the big talking points of what the GOP call “radical left” are just this. Exhibit A.

        We can theorize about radical left. Meanwhile, radical right is happening in real time.

      • Tiger666@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Thats just leftism. Radical leftist is: kill all landlords, billionaires, politicians, fascists, any one in government before the revolution, ect…

        IF YOU ARE NOT AT LEAST ADVOCATING FOR WORKERS CONTROLLING THE MEANS OF PRODUCTION THEN YOU ARE NOT A LEFTIST, YOU ARE LEFT LEANING AT BEST BUT STILL A CENTRIST.

  • affenlehrer@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I don’t think you have a left in the US. You have far right and center right. In Germany it’s like you had only AfD and CDU and that’s it.

    I mean it’s still obvious which choice is better but none of them is left.

    • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      From the 20th century, we have the ideological war against USSR to thank for that. It started all the way back with Wilson. After WWII, the threat of nuclear annihilation was a powerful tool for nationalism. (I’d learn only recently that a first strike was far more likely to come from US than USSR, and we had some dangerous war hawks in power.)

      Before that, after reconstruction came redemption and corporate interests took over both parties.

      Before that, roads, schools, bridges, libraries and such were socialism giving the working man benefits to which they didn’t contribute (we just contributed all the labor). Yes, they called it socialism even back in the 19th century.

      Do observe that adherence to neoliberalism in the EU (which is essentially corporatism with extra steps) is driving the rise of far right movements even over there. And when the tech-bros and white Christian nationalists over here are done bleeding the US dry like its private equity, they’ll be headed over there with their vast wealth to do the same thing.

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        You can go back further than that.

        The 1917 russian revolution kicked it off. The fear of a workers revolution happening in the US started a campaign of labelling everything socialist and communist as anti-american.

        • Matty Roses@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          even before then . . . the US has one of the bloodiest labor histories in the world. So to hide that, even in the 19th century US capitalists started claiming that socialism and unions were unamerican, and the work of subversive radicals, especially Germans and Jews.

    • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      We don’t have a large, cohesive, left party. There are people who are certainly left in the USA, but we have no real representation out of a handful of congress people.

      • Telemachus93@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Somewhat, yes. Whatever votes they get, they mostly take over from SPD and Greens, though. All three of those parties moved to the right significantly, so even if there is a majority for the three of them together some day and if (the bigger one) SPD and Greens enter into a coalition with Die Linke, my impression is that it won’t be that different from the SPD/Greens coalition at the turn of the century or the SPD/Greens/Liberals coalition in the past election cycle: center-left at best, but far from substantial improvements to our economy, social security system or imperialist foreign policy. :(

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      A lot of centrists, are frankly, kind of weak minded. A lot are not necessarily more right leaning but they don’t exactly have strong conviction. A friend of mine is right leaning on immigration and economics but at the same time he voted for the social democrats in his country because of over a decade of right wing government and supports Palestine. Some are centrists for the sake of being centrist it seems.

      The problem as to why many centrists sound right leaning is because the right captured prominent media platforms, and a huge part of its audience are lonely folks who are susceptible to misinformation, which my friend falls into. Many don’t become firmly on right but that doesn’t matter for the right wing billionaires funding the media platforms. It’s about sowing enough doubt to prevent forming a united front against the billionaire-Epstein class.

      • IronBird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        your a centrest because your scared of taking a stance on most important questions of the current moment

        I’m a centrist because I don’t know anything about the most important questions of the current moment

        We are sort of the same

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Encouraging people to find and listen to independent news media is one of the more effective things you can do for the resistance.

        By the way, you should add more independent news media to your news diet.

        Also, generally, if something makes you scared or mad, go online and look for other sources discussing the same story. It’ll not only provide nuance, but it’ll reveal what’s fact, and what is opinion or assertion.

  • yenahmik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    4 days ago

    I always considered myself a centrist. Of course, over the last 15 years the one side has become so damn batshit crazy it looks like I’m a party line voter simply based on my voting record.

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        I really don’t trust models that assert that tankies are on the left.

        Left wing politics is about distributing political power as widely and evenly as possible. Tankies are authoritarians who like autocracy brutally enforced. That’s the opposite.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Vanishingly few people who use the term know what it means, who invented it, or why it’s currently in circulation.

          It’s just a pejorative now. More often than not used to tell anti-war activists to shut up, because being anti-war is no different than surrendering to The Evil People.

  • Trump Rapes Kids@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    Why do I have to choose between the radical left and the radical right?

    What if I’m a male xenophobic racist who wants women to exist as sex toys to men and have no rights of their own and supports killing random civilians and children in other countries, especially when it grows in to genocide, but also wants a good life for the common male workers of the country, universal healthcare, and a sustainable climate?

    I want that universal health care and education, I want more affordable homes and such, but I also want to see goon squads in the street beating brown people with batons as often as possible because it makes me laugh. Why can’t I have both?

      • Trump Rapes Kids@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sadly if you just look at the last paragraph and replace the brown people bit with whoever a person feels justified to hate it seems like most people think something along these lines.

        People who still buy Harry Potter books or merchandise? Republicans? People from cultures where homosexuality is considered wrong who honestly speak about their own views?

        I think many of the loving tolerant folk of the internet would be thrilled with a world of universal health care, education, affordable homes, and seeing some or all of those people beaten in the streets.

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Social workers? Yes. Police as we know them? Nope. Proper education and mental health services will solve 99% of the problems. Most crime is unresolved personal issues and taking care of people will take care of the problems.

      • jumping redditor [they/them]@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        people that steal cars are one of the best uses for the current police, and if the police actually faced proper punishment for not kamikazing into mass shooters that would be another great use

    • PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Just enough to kill the untermenchen and keep people from objecting to my atrocities where I can hear. That’s such a reasonable thing I don’t know why they’re complaining there are too many.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Is that really Alison rosen now? Or was she joking herself? Stupid screenshot culture and no link…

  • Narauko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    This leaves out disarming the citizenry, defunding law enforcement, opening the borders, etc. This is a meme so the intentional skewing both makes sense and is tongue in cheek, but judging by the discussions here, there are a lot of people who seem to be taking this too much at face value.

    • Glytch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      What part of “Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary” is advocating for disarming the citizenry?

      You’re so heavily influenced by the right that you don’t even know what the radical left looks like. You’re still talking about liberals.

      • Tiger666@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Advocating for workers controlling the means of production is not radical leftism, its just leftism. Radical would be to seize the means and kill all the billionaires and landlords.

      • Narauko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I am 100% in agreement, but where in US politics is the left actually following Marx’s view on gun ownership? What percentage of the US Left actually agrees and owns guns? I wish it was a significant percentage, but since Leftist gun culture is generally hidden on top of being a minority the optics indicate a very small percentage.

        Blue states are the ones with gun bans, and the Democrat party is the big tent attempting to contain the “far Left”. Just because actual far Leftists don’t agree with it, doesn’t mean either poster in the meme aren’t talking about Republican and Democrat parties.

        Hell, look at the next comment on my post to find someone saying disarming the populace is great. I would hazard a guess they would consider themselves to be Left.

          • Narauko@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            What about though? Is there a large and thriving Radical Left gun culture that is regularly out in public and on places like YouTube, being vocal, and being proactive like sueing States and Cities for gun bans that I don’t know about? If there is an actual Leftist version of the NRA that I can also support please let me know so I can do so.

            I will still be a Capitalism with guardrails and regulations over Communism type of guy, but want to be able to vote for Universal Healthcare, cessation of Corporate power overreach, fair taxation of millionaires and billionaires, etc without also voting against my 2A rights.

      • Narauko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Very true, Marx had very similar reasons as the US founding fathers for the rights of citizens to be armed. I am not deeply emersed in communist/radical leftist spaces to know exactly how the numbers split, but I do know there are at least a significant percentage who believe it to be obsolete reasoning and not applicable to modern society and arms.

      • Narauko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m sure they do for some people, I was just pointing out that anything without solid widespread appeal with the liberal left and moderates was left out.