• Doom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Because they are only purple on the inside. Do you think apples are white? Or bananas?

  • Tiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    So, this is kinda weird, but general colors didn’t have names for a long time. Like in Greek texts by Homer he describes the water color as dark wine color because the name “blue” wasn’t a word. So it’s possible when they named a “red onion” purple wasn’t a color and considered a shade of red.

    Also as others have said purple was the color of royalty and they didn’t want an association.

    • FrChazzz@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s kind of wild when you learn that words for blue are relatively new in human language.

      • Seleni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 days ago

        In Japanese it’s the reverse; ‘blue’ is used for blue and green; designating green as the different color is relatively recent for them

      • koella@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        I started thinking that it kind of makes sense as blue is not a common naturally occurring color and then I remembered the sky.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yeah, that’s the part I have trouble with. Leaves are green, the sky is blue. They are very different colours. It’s not ambiguous like whether teal or turquoise is green or blue (I could easily see either of those being labelled as either blue or green), or different shades of the same colour like fuscia or maroon. They are different primary colours of light.

          It’s just weird to me that two very common every day colours that don’t look anything alike wouldn’t get distinct names. I understand that the blue photoreceptors we have are the newest ones and are less sensitive than the red and green ones, but I wouldn’t have figured that our evolution of it to the point where we see what we currently see (if you aren’t colour blind) would have been that recent. I expected hundreds of thousands of years, not tens of thousands or just thousands, which is what it would need to be to explain cultures that didn’t differentiate between the two until recently.

  • kamen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 days ago

    There’s a joke in Bulgarian somewhat related to that. What’s commonly referred to as a prune plum we call something that roughly translates to “blue plum”. The joke goes something like this:

    – Dad, what’s this?

    – It’s a blue plum.

    – Why is it red?

    – Because it’s green.

    Language is weird, but it’s ironic that our use of it makes it so.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’ve always hated the “blue, indigo, violet” end of the English words for the rainbow. I only recently found out that the 7 colours of the rainbow in English is especially BS.

      At the beginning of Newton’s time, there were thought to be 5 colours in the rainbow: red, yellow, green, blue and violet. Newton added Orange and Indigo because he thought (for spiritual reasons) there should be 7 colours. There were 7 days of the week, 7 planets (known at that time), 7 notes in the (western) musical scale, etc.

      But, Newton’s blue isn’t our blue today. For newton, the colour “blue” is what we currently call “cyan”, so the 7 colours of the rainbow were really red, orange, yellow, green, cyan (blue), blue (indigo) and violet. That makes a lot more sense.

      But, there really could be arbitrarily many colours in the rainbow. We could have “rust” as a colour, in between red and orange, or “gold” in between orange and yellow. We could even have a spectrum that didn’t include “green” but included “lime” which is between today’s yellow and green, and cyan on the other side, and no “green” at all.

  • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Same reason they call the tree a “Redbud tree.”

    Barely literate settlers were colonizing and writing home about the beautiful Puple Prule Purlple Lavendaar Red-Bud Trees.

  • killingspark@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Wait till they find out that some cultures didn’t have separate words for green and blue