Would there be a difference if we voting slowly, one by one?

  • Steve@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    If 8 billion humans displace 50 gallons each, thats 400 billion gallons. The volume of all oceans is about 1.5 billion cubic kilometers, which is 3.96258e20 gallons.

    Eh, I got tired of trying to do that math, but thats a big frickin difference. I dont think the sea level rise would be measurable.

    • apparia@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      50gal is quite generous; average adult weight estimate tops out around 80kg and that doesn’t account for children. Divided by approximate human density 1010kg/m³ gives 0.08m³ or around 21gal. Multiplying that by 8 billion humans and dividing by the ocean surface area of around 361000000 km² gives approximately… 1.8μm of sea level rise.

      • Steve@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Hey that gives rise to a new shower thought. If you blended all humans and spread them out evenly across the earth, how many atoms thick would the layer of human be?

  • radix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Per XKCD, nothing significant would happen. Even if all the people were standing in roughly the same area, the Earth would be moved by “less than an atom’s width.” If people were spread out randomly across the Earth, all the forces effectively cancel, and even less happens.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2M8Y0z9Rl0

  • gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    the planet Earth has a mass of 10²⁴ kg (source, Wikipedia), all humans together have a mass of 10¹² kg (source: do the math. 10 billion person · 100 kg/person). make of that what you will.

  • cdnk5@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    If you liquefied every human on earth and poured them all into one cube, it would only be about 800M per side. Humans collectively aren’t that significant.

    For comparison all insects would take up a 1km cube.

    • Onyxonblack@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      As a misanthropic Anti-Natalist that views humanity as the ultimate nightmare creature… Please tell us more about melting humans and the destruction of all sentient life!

  • susieq0044@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Actually, I’m a physicist from the world famous ETH in Zürich Switzerland, and my team and I have been working on exactly that question for the past five years! We have created an exciting theoretical model (manuscript has been submitted to PNAS, in second round of corrections). We are now focusing on a series of experiments to substantiate our theoretical findings. Alas, Switzerland is a notoriously landlocked country, due to which such experiments are hard to realize. In addition, strict nudity in public laws apply. As a result, all our grants were canceled, and we are now unemployed.

    • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      49 minutes ago

      I hope that you could at least all be nude while doing all that research work in your dark basement offices there beneath the mountains…