• infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 天前

    Bank workers are, at best, getting a small bonus when you sign that mortgage. Your fellow worker isn’t the enemy.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 天前

      These are the financial professionals that normal people should be able to trust to make important decisions.

      • 87Six@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        6 天前

        I mean… They’re salesmen more than trustworthy professionals.

        I see your point but the main issue is that nobody should ever trust the seller of anything to give them the info they need.

        People should only ever trust trustworthy independent third parties… But those are hard to find.

        I really don’t know what the solution is besides getting a better education, and I don’t mean a crap degree, I mean some more tangibile subjects in lower levels of school. I don’t blame them lightly, but people that accept this kind of thing aren’t the brightest.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 天前

          Having worked at a bank before (in their IT dept specifically), banks are extremely risk averse (and that extends to all aspects of the bank, from financial risks to HR risks to IT risks), and all of the loan officers I worked with were far more interested in doing their job right than being sales people.

          It’s in the banks best financial interest if it’s customers get wealthier because where does that wealth go? Into the bank they already bank at. Banks need to keep a certain amount of deposits in reserve, so the more cash deposited the more money the bank can invest in financial products itself to make itself more money. If all the bank does is mint loans that customers struggle to pay back their deposits will be very low and therefore they’ll make less money.

          Also sketchy loans are harder to sell as securities, as security bundles have to have balanced risk profiles both for legal compliance and for investors to be interested. Investors in mortgage backed securities (MBS) aren’t investing in MBSes for insane growth, they’re investing in a relatively safe security to park some cash in as part of their diversification

      • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 天前

        No, they’re not. A lot of them don’t even have a degree in anything.

        Your personal financial advisor is a person you should be able to trust with your important financial decisions. They guy at the bank handing you a contract to sign is an employee with a script on rails, a manager, and a commission structure.

        In a better world it wouldn’t be like that but in a better world I don’t think I’d be going to a bank in the first place.

    • Johanno@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 天前

      I’d like to differ. They are the ones selling you this slavery contract and probably don’t mention the impossible to deal with interest.

      A bank worker who is not your enemy would suggest you to switch banks or give you a reasonable contract. Of course depending on bank they might lose their job over the last one.

      • menas@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 天前

        No, it’s mean that the issue is not the workers, but the bankS. Or to be be even more concrete : the system that produce institutions with the function of bank. Opposing to those workers would not make a change; maybe you could make them fired, and others could take the place, but our choice wouldn’t make much difference compare to those of the employers in the bank industries. We could argue that opposing to one bank is the same; at most it could bankrupt (ironically), but other bank would take they function.

        That why this is the whole industry we shall oppose to, to against one bank, but against all of then. This is why people in revolutionary union organize by industry, and not by firm or professions. Helping workers in the bank industries getting less hour/day, less harassement and better stability would make the situation where they could diminish or abolish the predation of their employers against others (that are not only customers). We couldn’t expect solidarity from people we are not solidaire to.

        This is not about right or wrong, this is about effectiveness.

        • Johanno@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 天前

          Oh of course go against the banks! Those two are not exclusive. You can hate the salesman and his company.

          • menas@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 天前

            That’s ironic, because enforcing your moral code on others was what allow slave trades.

            But I will conform to you point of view for the sake of argument. Let say the problem of slave trade is “that’s unethical” If giving “more comfortable working conditions for slave traders” would abolish slave trades, that would unethical to not giving their more comfortable conditions

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 天前

      What kind of wacko lib upvotes this nonsense?

      Banks are capitalist AF. Literally the heart of capitalism.

      Pretty disgusting to hear these leeches framed as “workers”.

      There’s literally no work involved in collecting mortgage payments. That’s why it’s called “passive income.” That’s the whole point of hoarding land and housing.

      • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        6 天前

        The guy who facilitates your mortgage contract isn’t getting your mortgage payments. The corporation that employs them is. The guy is making a wage or maybe just an hourly salary, plus commission.

        By your logic, the checkout worker at costco is skimming off your wages to gate your access to food and clothing. The only difference is that you wouldn’t personally object morally to that line of work, but your personal morality isn’t a class distinction.

        All companies are “capitalist AF”. It’s not just banks. But even a sleezy car salesman who is trained to convince you to sign an extortive lease isn’t oppressing you. He isn’t betraying you at a class level. He isn’t the one getting your monthly payments. His plight is exactly the same as yours.

        This isn’t “wacko lib”, it’s literally Marx. And if we can’t understand that and stomach the differentiation, we will forever collectively stay oppressed.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 天前

        Bro, do you really think the owning class is the one on the other side of the desk when you sign the paper? No, it’s another peon like you or me.

        Have some fucking class solidarity

      • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 天前

        Yeah every commissioned salesperson you don’t like is literally nazi ss. Go off, you galaxybrained god.

          • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 天前

            Being able to tell the difference between a fellow worker and a class traitor isn’t bootlicking!

            I wasn’t even the person who generalized and nazified, the comment above me did. What in the actual heck, buddy?

  • Delphia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 天前

    In Australia the Average mortgage loan term is over 30 years but the average duration before its paid out or refinanced is only 8 years. Id be more worried about the terms and conditions surrounding early payout and refinancing than the theoretical maximum term of the loan on paper because if they want to be truly predatory thats where it will be hiding.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 天前

    Well, the USA has 96 month automobile loans and this kind of shit does not surprise me. None of the asswipes in DC are discussing the piss poor income distribution in the USA which leads to affordability and a decent middle class life. In 1789, the French were 100% correct.

  • bebabalula@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 天前

    Is this an actual thing in the us? We don’t have 50 year mortgages in Denmark but I can get a 30 year fixed interest at 3.5%

    • webpack@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      7 天前

      trump just announced 50 year mortgages

      this is so awesome I can’t wait to be in debt my entire life

    • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 天前

      No, but our Treasury Secretary recently floated the idea so it might become a thing soon. I believe there are already some 40-year mortgages, but they’re rare and non-standard. The 30-year mortgage has been an American institution since it was standardized under FDR’s New Deal in the 1930s.

  • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 天前

    Also, if the dealership is offering you 29% on a 7 year loan, please walk away. Stop giving in to that shit. It’s better for you, and it’s better for the rest of us.

  • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 天前

    I would rather eat my own children than sell them out to the future the banks have in mind.

    These people have abandoned humanity.

  • manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    7 天前

    The american dream of home ownership is rooted in settler colonialism, and used as a tool to keep workers in debt and afraid to take risks organising

    • FishFace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 天前

      Right that’s why no other country had dreams of home ownership.

      American exceptionalism really did a number on you guys!

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 天前

        Pretty sure almost every other country also inflicted or was subjected to colonialism/imperialism.

        For example, people in Belgium also have dreams of home ownership. That’s part of why they genocided people in Africa. This is ubiquitous.

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 天前

      The Pueblo, Iroquois, and other non-nomadic Native American groups might disagree about the colonialism part.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 天前

    I bought a fairly cheap house and paid it off as fast as I could.

    Could I have made more by investing that money instead of shoving it into a mortgage? Maybe.

    But you can’t live in an investment account. When the markets take a shit, you don’t lose a room from your house. And when it’s paid off, your outgoings are basically food, electricity and internet.

      • Zeon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 天前

        How is it so far? I’m thinking about getting a used motorhome around $15k, most likely from the late 90s or 2000s (one with at least a shower and toilet). I’m not a huge traveller, but boondocking seems interesting if I had a plan lined up, I would be open to living that way. I make around $65k/year and am single, no debt, so I think I could make it out. I already live a simplistic life, all I need is my guitar, laptop, and maybe a dog and I’d be chilling. The only thing I wonder about is surviving winter time or when it gets really hot out.

        • blindbunny@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 天前

          Make sure you get/got two propane tanks. Winter is kinda hard I just drained my freshwater tank because a freeze happened. I got a 2006 toy hauler it was used and the hotwater heater tank leaked when I got it I just recently ordered a tankless that’s runs off propane. The tires were surprisingly really good. I parked it in my little corner of NM and honestly haven’t moved it since. I’ll do it some day but I kinda like where I live. It’s not in the wilderness and not real safe but it’s real. Load 10k one of the better decisions I’ve made.

  • Melon Husk™@sh.itjust.worksBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 天前

    guess it’s time to start planning my great-grandkids’ mortgage payments now. gotta secure that intergenerational debt early.

  • Just more evidence that this administration gladly serves up the American people to wall street. I am not a particularly smart person, but even I know there is zero advantage for home buyers here. It ballons the cost of a home multifold. Since the American leaders are smarter than me, it means that they are proposing these financial slavery contracts ON PURPOSE, and their goal is to bleed away the last dollar from the average American. Didn’t Elizabeth Warren warn this was going to happen?