If you haven’t seen this yet, Google is planning to require mandatory developer identity verification for all Android apps, including apps distributed outside the Play Store, taking effect September 2026. This affects every independent and open source Android developer directly.

This is not just about the Play Store. After September 2026, on any certified Android device, applications from unverified developers will be blocked by default. The only proposed bypass, the “advanced flow”, exists only as a blog post and has not appeared in any beta, dev preview, or canary release. No one outside Google has seen it.

The community has been fighting back at keepandroidopen.org:

  • Read the full breakdown of what this means
  • Sign the open letter (organisations only)
  • Contact your national regulators — contacts listed by country on the site
  • Add the countdown banner to your project

September 2026 is closer than it looks. The time to push back is now.

  • starblursd@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    There actually has been an update on this. The advanced flow has been revealed and it’s like a 24-hour wait and a few prompts to go through and I’ll reboot and enabling developer mode… Bit of friction but all in all it’s better than nothing I guess.

    The dev verification is “optional”. With the condition that if a developer doesn’t then users can only install after jumping through a few hoops.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Yeah at least it’s better than Apple’s approach, where you have to connect your phone to a PC once every 7 days to reactivate Developer Mode. Don’t have a computer? Fuck you!

      That said, I have zero faith in Google sticking with the compromise solution in the long run. They’re going to try to force the change on everyone again in the future, once they’ve broken us down a bit more.

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 hours ago

      But they did this knowing that at this point there is not a viable alternative. It’s both monopoly, vendor lock, eee and enshittification all at once…

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        by 2027 there will be a linux phone. consumers won’t put up with this shit and vendors aren’t so blind to see an opportunity.

        • smeenz@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          2127…

          2227…

          2327…

          2427…

          Surely 2527 will be the year of the Linux phone…

        • Scrollone@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          There was already a Linux phone and even a Firefox phone, but with no wide app support it’s going to be a failure, just like it happened with Windows Phone.

          And I’m saying this as a person who would love for a true Linux phone alternative to succeed.

  • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Wait that’s not a thing already?

    So people can just make scam apps and once you report it to the App Store there is no recourse because even the company doesn’t know who they are?

    • deathbird@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The recourse has been removal.

      And the solution proposed is not requiring identification specifically for Play store developers, but any developer at all.

      • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Removal but no means for consumers to seek money back or damages because it’s just the Wild West?

        I think if you’re publishing an app to a public store then they should know who the fuck you are.

        • network_switch@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          This includes not in the Google play store so like f-droid or like how people would get software from a places website or GitHub or sourceforge or wherever and installing it like you can on Windows or a Mac or Linux

  • BigBenis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Starting to think phones should just go back to being exclusively for calling and texting anyway, maybe emailing too. Everything else can be done from a laptop. Does it really make our lives better to have access to everything through our phones?

    • YeahToast@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yeah, I’m not dragging a laptop around everywhere with me to search business opening hours / locations etc

      • BigBenis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 minutes ago

        Sure, mapping and locale data is extremely helpful and makes up a significant portion of what I use my phone for when I’m out and about. My question is more geared towards whether the ability to bank, shop or use social media from my phone is really necessary.

        Obviously, it’s a personal choice and I’m more thinking aloud when I question whether I’d be okay with the trade-off of having a phone with fewer capabilities.

  • titanicx@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Everyone freaking out when this is actually something you would want as a consumer. I want to know who the fuck is making my apps, where they are from, and where my data is going. If you don’t want this. I am guaranteeing you get viruses and shit all the fucking time.

    • MrFinnbean@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Nope. As a consumer i dont want one conglomerate to have power to decite what i can and cannot do on my personal device.

      It would mean they have 100% control over me as a consumer.

    • seriousslayerguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      As a consumer I want privacy and freedom, not a monopoly that controls what I can or cannot do on MY device that I bought with MY money. So up until now I installed any app that I wanted and never got any virus ever:) While you might be happy with your data going to google, I’m not.

      • GarboDog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Yeah, about the same time we started cutting Google out of our day to day. Every time we hear about Google it’s just getting more and more evil/greedy in one way or another

  • Nikls94@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I don’t get it… Google‘s main appeal over Apple is that you can install anything on Android. It runs worse, is less stable and sometimes just does dumb stuff. That’s like if Nintendo would get rid of Mario/Pokémon

    • Flatfire@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I don’t think that’s really the main appeal, honestly. The main appeal is just that it isn’t Apple. And were I someone who didn’t care about the installation of third-party applications, I wouldn’t be running to buy an iPhone. Android is just plain more customizable and if you need a quality of life feature, you’re probably going to find some way to have it.

      • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Android is just plain more customizable and if you need a quality of life feature, you’re probably going to find some way to have it.

        Yes.

        I used to feel that way about stock Android, but the really useful apps dried up on Google Play a few years back.

        Discovering F-Droid brought back the joy of customizing Android, for me.

        My conclusions:

        • Much of the charm of Android is already gone for the average user, but many haven’t noticed.
        • Making F-Droid harder to install isn’t going to help.

        I’m not sure what Google has done to alienate the folks writing quality free apps, but whatever it is, most of them are only on F-Droid, already.

        This feels like Google is just shutting the door on the walled garden they’ve been building for awhile.

      • Nikls94@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        You can get an iPhone at around 500$. Below that price, sure, Android is good. But once you reach the price at which you could get an iPhone, why not get one in the first place? Android isn’t more customizable in this day and age than iPhone.

        Besides custom launchers and icons, the only thing that comes to my mind is custom WhatsApp messaging sound.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Android’s own appeal probably died somewhere in 2013 or 2014, but it has always kept strong for a very simple reason: phone prices. You could either pay 700 dollars for an iphone, or 200 for an android

      • Kilgore Trout@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Cheaper, but not by far:

        iPhone 17 Pixel 10 iPhone 17 Pro Pixel 10 Pro iPhone 17 Pro Max Pixel 10 Pro XL
        979 899 1339 1099 1489 1299
          • Kilgore Trout@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Indeed, since the company behind Android+PlayServices also sells phones running Android+PlayServices. But aside from this it’s on me for reading something that was not written.

  • EndlessDesolation@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I hope projects like Postmarket OS and Sailfish get big enough soon and have compatibility in banking apps so we can make the switch to Linux phones. Android is a sinking ship tbh.

    • MissingGhost@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I’ve never used a banking app. Don’t they usually have web sites? What am I missing on?

      • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Nothing, but in some countries banks force you to use apps. You know, "for your security ".

        • Flatfire@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Pretty much. My bank imposes transfer limits on the web portal vs the app, since there’s purportedly more security in the physical device rather than a web page accessible from any system.

          While I don’t necessarily disagree with this, it means those apps also have to be searching for things like “Is USB debugging on? Is this running in an emulator? Is the device rooted?”

          None of these are bad checks to make from a security perspective, but by relying on the app on a single device as a defacto MFA hurts the ability to manage personal finances when you’re in a position like this, with Google defining the security requirements of their ecosystem at a higher level than any single app.

      • reksas@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        my main use of my bank application is for verification for government stuff, as well as managing my money without having to get on my pc. it would be really annoying to lose access to it, as with it i dont have to use the verification number table which is physical table of numbers that has to be replaced occasionally and could get lost.

    • Cyberwolf@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It is, ironically, the only phone were you can install GrapheneOS, arguably the most secure and private phone you can have today.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I never believed that shit. mostly because Google designed and developed the phone and god only knows what kind of firmware backdoors are on any of the hardware.

        besides that, any money that goes to google only fuels their thirst for power.

        • UnimportantHuman@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          You have a fair concern but I do want to say it is possible to get the phones secondhand. Even if someone does buy the phone just to install GrapheneOS then at least they only get a small purchase vs a lifetime of selling your data and continuing to profit off of them long-term.

          • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I understand that, but even if you buy it secondhand it only enables someone else to buy a new pixel at a cheaper cost to them. if they’re forced to hold their old phones because the market is stagnant, the likely result will be a drop in sales to google.

            • StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              That’s like saying if you buy a lemonade from a lemonade stand, the kids are only going to use it to buy drugs, there’s no correlation there, plus, people typically only sell their old phones AFTER they’ve got a hold of the new one

  • lacaio 🇧🇷🏴‍☠️🇸🇴@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Banks, government apps and main apps (Whatsapp, etc.) are on Google Play. It’s clear governments will stick with Google. What is left to know is how seriously democratic governments take civil liberties.

    • zemo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      17 hours ago

      There have been talks in Europe about how we are dependent on American tech for our digital infrastructure. Some politicians even pushing for an alternative to Apple and Google. I hope everyone else wakes up before it’s too late.

  • Sunflier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    It just occured to me what this is all about: shutting down the ICE tracking app. They won’t carry it on the play store, but its still being shared.

    https://antifreeze.app/

    With this, you can’t get it on your phone. And, given how much Google is sucking up to tRump, they want to help him shut this down along with all the other evil.

    • KuroiKaze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      20 hours ago

      The governments put pressure on Google to police off play apps and harm because they are attached to Android so they’re being required to build this.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      22 hours ago

      You can still get it, you just need to wait 24h before you can install the first app the first time, and there will be some big scary warnings.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Ya, this is their new workflow for people who dont authentic themselves.

          Turn on developer mode and choose the right setting, reboot phone, wait 24h, then you can install anything. You have the option to stay like this, or revert to 24h wait after 7 days.

          Edit: they just announced it in the past few days.