True. I know this is a simplification, probably completely wrong…but you, one random carbon atom? Sincerely, fuck you
Methyl group*
And a hydrogen on the other side of the double bond.
I was gonna say, I’m rusty on my chemistry, but that couldn’t be a carbon atom floating off with just a single bond. Carbon needs 4 bonds to fill its shell.
The right one is estradiol, not estrogen. So wrong by technicality.
It’s quite in there so it’s probably more difficult to modify than a functional group.
Yes, people use estradiol and estrogen interchangeably. It’s technically not correct, but works in most cases, since estradiol is the estrogen that’s used for HRT, both in gender-affirming care and in menopausal women.
Estrogens are a group of hormones. There are three main ones and one produced mainly during pregnancy.
Estrogens are:- Estrone (E1)
- Estradiol (E2, the one that’s used in HRT, most people mean this when referring to "estrogen)
- Estriol (E3)
- Estetrol (E4, had to look this one up, it’s apparently produced during pregnancy)
So, yes, you’re correct but it really only is a technicality.
Please correct me if I’m wrong about anything.Actually, still right. Estradiol is a type of estrogen, there are about 4.
I was having fun. It’s still a mismatch as T is an actual, concrete compound.
Not as far off as you think - the protein aromatase converts testosterone directly into estradiol by aromatising the carbon ring, I.e removing the bond with that carbon atom and moving it to the carbon ring. So theres a protein with the job to telling that one carbon atom to fuck off.
Shout out to aromatase fr



