[green, speaking, looking smug]
Okay, hear me out, here’s the plan…
We go full apathy, basically we let capitalism fully spiral out into fascism. Once it’s done, people will rise up and the system will collapse under its own weight. From its ashes, with our help, a better society will rise. This is how we win.

[we now see that green is tied up in front of a bleak wall, along with a group of other people, being aimed at by a firing squad of characters in fascist uniforms]
[green, smiling] OK?
[blue, pissed] Dude…

https://thebad.website/comic/accelerationism

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    26 minutes ago

    Literally Ernst Thälmann. He said to let the Nazis take power, and then the whole world will see how incompetent they are, and then his communist party will surely rise up! But there are no prizes for guessing what happened to him in the end!

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    After WW2 65 million people were dead and 50% of the boys and men in Germany were dead. Everyone loses with fascism

  • socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    This isn’t even the stupidest point of accelerationism. That’s the assumption that your personal utopia will emerge from the ashes, instead of something much worse.

    The simple fact of the matter is that there is no path to “perfect” which doesn’t track through an infinite amount of “better” first.

    • Donkter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yeah the take plays against their point and into the hands of fascists. A common retort from “capitalists” goes “well why doesn’t your economic system compete on the free market? If it’s so good it will rise to the top.” You believing your ideology will defacto rise from a blank slate after society collapses lends credence to that argument. (Which is flawed in so many ways)

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Obviously, we shouldn’t need to detail “villains bad” in media, but with so many of them having “from the ashes” plans, I’d like to see more heroes deconstructing their approach like this.

  • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Okay, but capitalism dystopia is not going to look like that. In real capitalism, that wall will be covered in advertisements and motivation posters.

  • AlbynRailroad@fedinsfw.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The real solution btw is just a better consensus mechanism in our electoral process in the form of STAR Voting.
    It is quite literally that simple.
    The lack of choice (as explained in Duverger’s Law) is what kills our politics and helps the media portray all political battles as us vs them and not “What shade out of a million shades of gray should this policy be?”.

    tl;dr - STAR Voting is quite literally a panacea for nearly all the extreme ills that plague our politics - even a large portion of “voting doesn’t matter so I won’t” apathy…because to vote “strategically” under STAR Voting is to just vote honestly and every vote matters. No revolution required - just a better electoral process. I’m happy to answer any questions.

  • RedFrank24@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Accelerationism isn’t just being apathetic, it’s actively making things worse. It’s voting for Trump because the DNC didn’t elect Bernie Sanders.

    Lenin was much the same. He knew a revolution wouldn’t happen if things got better, so he did everything he could to make things as bad as humanly possible. When the provisional government came along, granted free speech rights and universal suffrage, Lenin was vehemently opposed to it, because you can’t have a communist revolution when stuff is going well. A stable government is not one you can overthrow.

    • yogurt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      46 minutes ago

      When the provisional government came along, granted free speech rights and universal suffrage

      The provisional goverment was unelected and self-appointed, arrested people for arguing in favor of refusing to fight in WWI, and after months of protests said they would allow women to vote whenever they got around to having an election but women couldn’t vote until 20 and men 18.

      Lenin wasn’t opposed to the provisional government when it came along because he was in Germany and didn’t know how mad a lot of people were at the random gang of Chuck Schumers from the Tsarist government who had declared themselves in charge, ignoring the Soviets that were already forming an elected government, and spent months stalling their version of an election so they could keep the incredibly unpopular WWI going.

      Lenin started opposing the provisional government after 20k awol marines with machine guns showed up at his office saying they hated it, he said ok and then spent a couple months writing a book to explain why the angry guys with guns have a point.

      If he was trying to be accelerationist he would have just hyped up the marines and let them shoot everybody instead of following the path of least resistance to a stable government that could last 6 months without a coup.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      I think you forgot the part where the provisional government wanted to keep drafting people to feed into the pointless meat grinder of WWI, which Lenin opposed rather strongly.

    • Silver Needle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      A stable government is not one you can overthrow.

      Governments (nations) are in their nature not stable. Governments can be overthrown at any moment. It is a question of how many are willing to participate, which is not that many.

      because you can’t have a communist revolution when stuff is going well

      Not Lenin’s reasoning, nor is it as a statement true. Revolutions have happened exactly at points where things were looking up, take the transitions that have happened in history where monarchies were superseded by the liberal state. It is not a cyclical trend where, oh no, we have some sort of downtrend in productivity or some other sort of crisis and then the magical revolution comes to save the day. Revolutions happen because systems are forced to adopt organisational structures that satisfy (novel) needs, not because of shittiness.

      • EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        I voted for Biden and things did indeed get worse. Now we see that Trump was voted in and they are getting worse. Soon we will vote in a new Congress and then a new President and things will continue to get worse.

        Thankfully I stopped voting after Biden, so my bad luck 🍀 has peaked.

        PSA to all the “voters” out there. I no longer worry about politics because I know that things can only get worse. 😎

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Thankfully I stopped voting after Biden, so my bad luck 🍀 has peaked.

          I mean, you joke. But folks really do seem to believe there’s a karmic curse on people who “vote wrong”. That’s the entire theory of Leopards Eating Faces, anyway.

          • EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            That’s just cause & effect.

            Are things going to keep getting worse? Probably.

            Do you need to vote if that’s the case? Not really, but it’s an external locus of control. You feel you have power because you got to choose who made things worse.

  • Psythik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    As a Millennial this is basically how I feel about Gen Z. Why are they so apathetic regarding everything? If anyone gets passionate about anything because they want something done about the rise of fascism, you get labeled as “crashing out”! It’s annoying as fuck!

    • cub Gucci@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      55 minutes ago

      As a millennial, you should understand that there’s no coherent volition behind surplus objects like Gen Z. Do you remember how the US just added every muslim to the list of terrorists or how suddenly all single mothers in the UK became a parasite?

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Stop crashing out… :)

      No but I think its because of never ending negative things happening. People stop to care because they cant affect it.

    • Lumisal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Trump was elected under millennials, not Z. Americans in general are apathetic - it’s a culture issue, not a generational one.

      I see that difference extremely clearly now that I live in Finland.

      • potpotato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        “The youngest voters and those entering middle age tacked hard to the right. Gen X — which slightly favored president-elect Donald Trump with a one-point margin in 2020 — shifted 9 points toward Trump this cycle. Gen Z favored Vice President Kamala Harris by 11 points, compared to 24 points for President Joe Biden.

        Gen Z’s big shift to the right wasn’t entirely unexpected. Teens were twice as likely to identify as more conservative than their parents compared to millennials 20 years ago, per a Gallup and Walton Family Foundation study conducted last fall.”

        -Business Insider

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Accelerationism is really dumb which is why it’s such a popular strawman.

    Does someone have a different opinion? Well, it could be that different people have different ideas about how the world works as well as different priorities. But that’s all complicated and nuanced and forces you to contend with different perspectives. Instead, just assume that everyone has your perspective because it’s just inherently obvious to everyone, but some people are intentionally trying to make things worse because they’re stupid and evil.

    Virtually no one is an actual accelerationist.

    • ceoofanarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yep very few actual believers but if you don’t support their “pragmatic” suggestions that throw billions under the bus they accuse you of this.

  • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Once it’s done?

    Facissm doesn’t end on its own. It needs to get pushed out.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Pretty much the same plan as the Republicans, right? They were all about burning it down but plenty of them are arriving at the “Dude!” stage.

  • ceoofanarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Almost nobody is arguing this maybe i should give you the benefit of the doubt but I just can’t people hating your “nicer” imperialist genocidal capitalists don’t believe this.